|
RFC v2: Static Analysis in edk2 CI 9 messages
This is version 2 of the proposal that provides additional details regarding the bring up process. The initial version is at https://edk2.groups.io/g/rfc/message/696 The goal of the proposal is integr
This is version 2 of the proposal that provides additional details regarding the bring up process. The initial version is at https://edk2.groups.io/g/rfc/message/696 The goal of the proposal is integr
|
By
Felix Polyudov
·
|
|
[PATCH] [rfc] Add SBOM (software bill of materials) to the efi binaries 10 messages
This patch modifies the build system in order to generate and use metadata to add it to the efi binaries. It uses python-uswid [1], given a set of config files (.ini) with the metadata it converts the
This patch modifies the build system in order to generate and use metadata to add it to the efi binaries. It uses python-uswid [1], given a set of config files (.ini) with the metadata it converts the
|
By
Martin Fernandez
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [rfc] Remove support for unsupported tool_chain_tags 2 messages
I can sign up to maintain XCODE. I think Rebecca has been running test builds with XCODE. The XCODE5 names comes from the compiler flags needing to change for Xcode 5. Yes 2013 called and wants it com
I can sign up to maintain XCODE. I think Rebecca has been running test builds with XCODE. The XCODE5 names comes from the compiler flags needing to change for Xcode 5. Yes 2013 called and wants it com
|
By
Andrew Fish
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [rfc] Remove support for unsupported tool_chain_tags
Hi, It's basically gcc 5 & newer. I think all the GCC4x variants can be dropped by now. take care, Gerd
Hi, It's basically gcc 5 & newer. I think all the GCC4x variants can be dropped by now. take care, Gerd
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-rfc] [rfc] Remove support for unsupported tool_chain_tags
Sean: After remove, the supported tool chain will have its maintainer. This is a good idea. For CLANG tool chain, CLANGPDB and CLANGDWARF supports IA32 and X64 arch only, they can run Windows/Linux/Ma
Sean: After remove, the supported tool chain will have its maintainer. This is a good idea. For CLANG tool chain, CLANGPDB and CLANGDWARF supports IA32 and X64 arch only, they can run Windows/Linux/Ma
|
By
gaoliming
·
|
|
[rfc] Remove support for unsupported tool_chain_tags
As discussed at the weekly tools meeting, I am proposing that all unsupported tool chains get removed from tools_def.template in the Basetools/Conf folder (edk2/tools_def.template at master · tianocor
As discussed at the weekly tools meeting, I am proposing that all unsupported tool chains get removed from tools_def.template in the Basetools/Conf folder (edk2/tools_def.template at master · tianocor
|
By
Sean
·
|
|
Proposal to add support for PCIe enumeration protocols in PEI 20 messages
Hi All, I would like to propose a new protocol which would standardize a way a device driver PEIM communicates with PEIM that discovers PCI devices and manages their resources(later called enumerator
Hi All, I would like to propose a new protocol which would standardize a way a device driver PEIM communicates with PEIM that discovers PCI devices and manages their resources(later called enumerator
|
By
Albecki, Mateusz
·
|
|
edk2-vUDK2018 Mdk build failure 2 messages
I am getting this failure during build: ``` In file included from /home/edk2/edk2/MdePkg/Library/BasePrintLib/PrintLibInternal.h:22, from /home/edk2/edk2/MdePkg/Library/BasePrintLib/PrintLibInternal.c
I am getting this failure during build: ``` In file included from /home/edk2/edk2/MdePkg/Library/BasePrintLib/PrintLibInternal.h:22, from /home/edk2/edk2/MdePkg/Library/BasePrintLib/PrintLibInternal.c
|
By
startergo
·
|
|
Inclusive Language Update RFC
Hello all, We have updated the Overview section of the Inclusive Language Guidelines to clarify two things. 1. Which version (via date) of the [[UEFI Inclusive Language Implementation Guidelines|https
Hello all, We have updated the Overview section of the Inclusive Language Guidelines to clarify two things. 1. Which version (via date) of the [[UEFI Inclusive Language Implementation Guidelines|https
|
By
Teng, Lynn L
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] Update NASM to stable release 2.15.05 3 messages
Mike, Sounds like a good plan. Thanks, Andrew Fish
Mike, Sounds like a good plan. Thanks, Andrew Fish
|
By
Andrew Fish
·
|
|
[edk2-announce] Inclusive Language RFC
Hello Sean, You make a good point. I will remove both steps 3.1 and 4.1 from the plan for now so we can focus on the main proposal. We can open a discussion later on to determine how best to maintain
Hello Sean, You make a good point. I will remove both steps 3.1 and 4.1 from the plan for now so we can focus on the main proposal. We can open a discussion later on to determine how best to maintain
|
By
Teng, Lynn L
·
|
|
RFC: Static Analysis in edk2 CI 2 messages
I would like to start a discussion regarding integration of the static analysis (SA) into the edk2 workflow. I assume the SA benefits are well understood, so I'll get straight to the point; however, i
I would like to start a discussion regarding integration of the static analysis (SA) into the edk2 workflow. I assume the SA benefits are well understood, so I'll get straight to the point; however, i
|
By
Felix Polyudov
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] RFC: Replace FMMT Tool from C to Python Version
Hi everyone, I would like to propose the new FMMT Python tool, which is used to replace the origin C version tool. Currently the FMMT C tool is saved in edk2-staging repo, but its quality and coding s
Hi everyone, I would like to propose the new FMMT Python tool, which is used to replace the origin C version tool. Currently the FMMT C tool is saved in edk2-staging repo, but its quality and coding s
|
By
Yuwei Chen
·
|
|
[edk2-discuss] [edk2-rfc] Inclusive Language RFC
Hello Marvin, Your concerns have been heard, but providing a list of every alternative for every scenario and how/when to use them would be unreasonable. We would expect developers to use their unders
Hello Marvin, Your concerns have been heard, but providing a list of every alternative for every scenario and how/when to use them would be unreasonable. We would expect developers to use their unders
|
By
Teng, Lynn L
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] RFC: Replace FMMT Tool from C to Python Version 3 messages
Liming, Correct. PyFMMT does not depend on GenSec, GenFfs and GenFv. Yes. the future PyGenSec, PyGenFfs and PyGenFv can reuse code from PyFMMT. Thanks, Bob Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 10:16 AM To:
Liming, Correct. PyFMMT does not depend on GenSec, GenFfs and GenFv. Yes. the future PyGenSec, PyGenFfs and PyGenFv can reuse code from PyFMMT. Thanks, Bob Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 10:16 AM To:
|
By
Bob Feng
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] RFC: Replace FMMT Tool from C to Python Version
Christine: This is a good news. Thanks for your great work. With this change, FMMT doesn’t depend on GenSec, GenFfs and GenFv C tool. Right? If yes, can those logic be reused to replace GenSec, GenFfs
Christine: This is a good news. Thanks for your great work. With this change, FMMT doesn’t depend on GenSec, GenFfs and GenFv C tool. Right? If yes, can those logic be reused to replace GenSec, GenFfs
|
By
gaoliming
·
|
|
Inclusive Language RFC 2 messages
Hello all, Please provide your feedback and comments to the Inclusive Language Plan below over the next two weeks (10/25-11/05). Thank you in advance for your contributions. *** ## Overview To promote
Hello all, Please provide your feedback and comments to the Inclusive Language Plan below over the next two weeks (10/25-11/05). Thank you in advance for your contributions. *** ## Overview To promote
|
By
Teng, Lynn L
·
|
|
Update NASM to stable release 2.15.05 2 messages
Hello, I would like to propose that we update to a newer version of NASM. https://www.nasm.us/ The most recent stable version is 2.15.05. https://www.nasm.us/pub/nasm/releasebuilds/2.15.05/ NASM 2.15.
Hello, I would like to propose that we update to a newer version of NASM. https://www.nasm.us/ The most recent stable version is 2.15.05. https://www.nasm.us/pub/nasm/releasebuilds/2.15.05/ NASM 2.15.
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
|
|
[RFC] [PATCH 0/2] Proposal to add EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL support for AARCH64 13 messages
I'd like to propose adding EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL support for AARCH64 systems. I've attached two patches to implement support for it in the DXE phase, based on code in EmulatorPkg and UefiCpuPkg. It
I'd like to propose adding EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL support for AARCH64 systems. I've attached two patches to implement support for it in the DXE phase, based on code in EmulatorPkg and UefiCpuPkg. It
|
By
Rebecca Cran
·
|
|
[RFC] [PATCH 2/2] ArmPkg: Add Library/MpInitLib to support EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL
Add support for EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL during the DXE phase under AArch64. Call PSCI_CPU_ON to power on the core, call the supplied procedure and then call PSCI_CPU_OFF to power off the core. Signed
Add support for EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL during the DXE phase under AArch64. Call PSCI_CPU_ON to power on the core, call the supplied procedure and then call PSCI_CPU_OFF to power off the core. Signed
|
By
Rebecca Cran
·
|