|
[RFC V3] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
Hello, The following bug has been fixed on edk2/master https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111 https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1226 This bug is also considered a critical bug agains
Hello, The following bug has been fixed on edk2/master https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111 https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1226 This bug is also considered a critical bug agains
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
|
|
[EXTERNAL] Re: [RFC V2] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
2 messages
“I agree with Liming that stable branches should have a predefined lifetime. Keeping stable branches regression-free is very difficult and ungrateful work, and the community should not have expectatio
“I agree with Liming that stable branches should have a predefined lifetime. Keeping stable branches regression-free is very difficult and ungrateful work, and the community should not have expectatio
|
By
Bret Barkelew
·
|
|
回复: [RFC V2] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
Mike: > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@...> > 发送时间: 2020年12月16日 10:52 > 收件人: gaoliming <gaoliming@...>; devel@edk2.groups.io; > rfc@edk2.groups.io; 'Andrew Fish' <afish@...>
Mike: > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@...> > 发送时间: 2020年12月16日 10:52 > 收件人: gaoliming <gaoliming@...>; devel@edk2.groups.io; > rfc@edk2.groups.io; 'Andrew Fish' <afish@...>
|
By
gaoliming
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
Mike: I review all submodules in edk2. They are all from github except for cmocka. So, I agree to use github mirror for cmocka. Thanks Liming > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: bounce+27952+69010+4905953+8761045
Mike: I review all submodules in edk2. They are all from github except for cmocka. So, I agree to use github mirror for cmocka. Thanks Liming > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: bounce+27952+69010+4905953+8761045
|
By
gaoliming
·
|
|
回复: [RFC V2] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
Mike: > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@...> > 发送时间: 2020年12月16日 8:25 > 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; rfc@edk2.groups.io; > gaoliming@...; Andrew Fish (afish@...) > <afish@...>;
Mike: > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@...> > 发送时间: 2020年12月16日 8:25 > 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; rfc@edk2.groups.io; > gaoliming@...; Andrew Fish (afish@...) > <afish@...>;
|
By
gaoliming
·
|
|
[EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-rfc] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
My vote is to own a fork. I agree with Laszlo that it’s very low maintenance (may even be able to automate it with an existing DevOps pipeline to run every day) and gives us the most control of our de
My vote is to own a fork. I agree with Laszlo that it’s very low maintenance (may even be able to automate it with an existing DevOps pipeline to run every day) and gives us the most control of our de
|
By
Bret Barkelew
·
|
|
[RFC V2] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
3 messages
Hello, The following bug has been fixed on edk2/master https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111 https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1226 This bug is also considered a critical bug agains
Hello, The following bug has been fixed on edk2/master https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111 https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1226 This bug is also considered a critical bug agains
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
|
|
[RFC] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
7 messages
Hello, The following bug has been fixed on edk2/master https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111 https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1226 This bug is also considered a critical bug agains
Hello, The following bug has been fixed on edk2/master https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111 https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1226 This bug is also considered a critical bug agains
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
|
|
The code that creates the TCG Event Log needs an audit
4 messages
[RFC] The code that creates the TCG Event Log needs an audit Problem Statement The TCG support code included in the EDK2 tree is in place to enable the two major features provided by a platform TPM. 1
[RFC] The code that creates the TCG Event Log needs an audit Problem Statement The TCG support code included in the EDK2 tree is in place to enable the two major features provided by a platform TPM. 1
|
By
Dick Wilkins
·
|
|
RFC: Adding support for ARM (RNDR etc.) to RngDxe
Currently, RngDxe in SecurityPkg only supports Intel, with RdRand support. This RFC is to start a discussion about adding support for ARM. I have a Git branch with support for the optional ARMv8.5 RND
Currently, RngDxe in SecurityPkg only supports Intel, with RdRand support. This RFC is to start a discussion about adding support for ARM. I have a Git branch with support for the optional ARMv8.5 RND
|
By
Rebecca Cran
·
|
|
[staging/branch] [RFC] Add TDVF Branch to edk2-staging
In order to support Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) (https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/intel-trust-domain-extensions.html), we need a new Trust Domain Virtual Firmware
In order to support Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) (https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/intel-trust-domain-extensions.html), we need a new Trust Domain Virtual Firmware
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [RFC] Support Both MM Traditional and Standalone Drivers with One MM Core
8 messages
Which method is the least risky with regard to regressions, in your opinion? I tend to prefer #2. Either option is neutral for ArmVirtPkg at the moment, and option#2 is safer for OvmfPkg (no risk of r
Which method is the least risky with regard to regressions, in your opinion? I tend to prefer #2. Either option is neutral for ArmVirtPkg at the moment, and option#2 is safer for OvmfPkg (no risk of r
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
|
|
[RFC] Support Both MM Traditional and Standalone Drivers with One MM Core
Hi, All This email is to collect feedback about making one common EDK2 MM Core driver to support both MM Traditional drivers and MM Standalone drivers. We know that PI Spec defines two types of MM-rel
Hi, All This email is to collect feedback about making one common EDK2 MM Core driver to support both MM Traditional drivers and MM Standalone drivers. We know that PI Spec defines two types of MM-rel
|
By
Siyuan, Fu
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] [RFC] Request to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Intel folder
4 messages
Why not move to edk2 repo? Thanks, Hot
Why not move to edk2 repo? Thanks, Hot
|
By
Hot Tian
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [RFC] Request to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Intel folder
4 messages
Nate, I would actually propose you go further. In Project Mu we consume MinPlatform as its own repo. This is because it has its own lifetime and spans multiple product generations and hopefully someda
Nate, I would actually propose you go further. In Project Mu we consume MinPlatform as its own repo. This is because it has its own lifetime and spans multiple product generations and hopefully someda
|
By
Sean
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [RFC] Request to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Intel folder
Hey Laszlo, With regard to the tool refactoring, Leif had the same feedback and I completely agree with both of you. I have filed a BZ to track the tool refactoring as a separate item: https://bugzill
Hey Laszlo, With regard to the tool refactoring, Leif had the same feedback and I completely agree with both of you. I have filed a BZ to track the tool refactoring as a separate item: https://bugzill
|
By
Nate DeSimone
·
|
|
[RFC] Request to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Intel folder
8 messages
Hi Everyone, This has come up informally a couple of times already, but I do think that it would be beneficial to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Platform/Intel folder and into a vendor neutral folder.
Hi Everyone, This has come up informally a couple of times already, but I do think that it would be beneficial to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Platform/Intel folder and into a vendor neutral folder.
|
By
Nate DeSimone
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [RFC] Request to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Intel folder
Hi Nate, totally agree with you. Best, Chris -- *Christian Walter* *Head of Firmware Development / Cyber Security * 9elements GmbH, Kortumstraße 19-21, 44787 Bochum, Germany Email: christian.walter@..
Hi Nate, totally agree with you. Best, Chris -- *Christian Walter* *Head of Firmware Development / Cyber Security * 9elements GmbH, Kortumstraße 19-21, 44787 Bochum, Germany Email: christian.walter@..
|
By
christian.walter@...
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
17 messages
I think code review works. I’m primarily interested in seeing how much code falls under the “edk2” vs “edk2-staging” repos. - Bret Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 8:12 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mai
I think code review works. I’m primarily interested in seeing how much code falls under the “edk2” vs “edk2-staging” repos. - Bret Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 8:12 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mai
|
By
Bret Barkelew
·
|
|
[RFC] Proposal to move all FSP 1.x binaries to "legacy" branch
Hi Everyone, Given that we have removed FSP 1.x support from TianoCore in edk2-stable201908, it seems that the 1.x FSP binaries at https://github.com/intel/FSP have become increasingly limited in thei
Hi Everyone, Given that we have removed FSP 1.x support from TianoCore in edk2-stable201908, it seems that the 1.x FSP binaries at https://github.com/intel/FSP have become increasingly limited in thei
|
By
Nate DeSimone
·
|