|
[RFC] Proposal to move all FSP 1.x binaries to "legacy" branch
Hi Everyone, Given that we have removed FSP 1.x support from TianoCore in edk2-stable201908, it seems that the 1.x FSP binaries at https://github.com/intel/FSP have become increasingly limited in thei
Hi Everyone, Given that we have removed FSP 1.x support from TianoCore in edk2-stable201908, it seems that the 1.x FSP binaries at https://github.com/intel/FSP have become increasingly limited in thei
|
By
Nate DeSimone
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] Basetools as a pip module
5 messages
Matthew, I’ll throw out some current developer centric ideas. 1) If you `source edksetup.sh` (edksetup.bat) you get the current behavior, and you add an argument you get the pip flavor? So maybe `edks
Matthew, I’ll throw out some current developer centric ideas. 1) If you `source edksetup.sh` (edksetup.bat) you get the current behavior, and you add an argument you get the pip flavor? So maybe `edks
|
By
Andrew Fish
·
|
|
Basetools as a pip module
Hello all, A recent topic on the RFC mailing list went out and the work on moving Basetools/Sources/Python to a separate repo has started. See the RFC conversation here: https://edk2.groups.io/g/rfc/t
Hello all, A recent topic on the RFC mailing list went out and the work on moving Basetools/Sources/Python to a separate repo has started. See the RFC conversation here: https://edk2.groups.io/g/rfc/t
|
By
Matthew Carlson
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [Wiki][Patch V2] Add EDK II Code First Process Wiki Page
4 messages
A version of this Wiki page is also provided here for review: https://github.com/mdkinney/edk2/wiki/EDK-II-Code-First-Process Mike
A version of this Wiki page is also provided here for review: https://github.com/mdkinney/edk2/wiki/EDK-II-Code-First-Process Mike
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
|
|
Git commit message RFC
7 messages
Hi, All In this RFC we're proposing slight changes to Git commit message format to make it more informative and more friendly for automation tools. Here is the list of changes proposed 1. Start subjec
Hi, All In this RFC we're proposing slight changes to Git commit message format to make it more informative and more friendly for automation tools. Here is the list of changes proposed 1. Start subjec
|
By
Artem Shchygel
·
|
|
SubRegionAuthLib RFC
8 messages
Hi, I filed a proposal for a new library to handle UEFI BIOS sub-regions at https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2808. Attached is a slide deck with design overview of the new library. A UEF
Hi, I filed a proposal for a new library to handle UEFI BIOS sub-regions at https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2808. Attached is a slide deck with design overview of the new library. A UEF
|
By
Mackay, Curtis A
·
|
|
UEFI accessibility mandate
36 messages
Hello all, I'm new here, and was recommended to the TianoCore project by someone over at the UEFI forum. I've run across TianoCore before, and like the project. Before anyone gets worried by the subje
Hello all, I'm new here, and was recommended to the TianoCore project by someone over at the UEFI forum. I've run across TianoCore before, and like the project. Before anyone gets worried by the subje
|
By
Ethin Probst
·
|
|
PKCS7 Authenticated Variable Enrollment
6 messages
Hi, I am trying to test if the enrollment of Authenticated Variables is possible with verification of signature with different key sizes. File: AuthService.c :: Function: VerifyTimeBasedPayload() -> P
Hi, I am trying to test if the enrollment of Authenticated Variables is possible with verification of signature with different key sizes. File: AuthService.c :: Function: VerifyTimeBasedPayload() -> P
|
By
Wadhawan, Divneil R
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] MdeModulePkg/StatusCodeHandler: Separate NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler modules
11 messages
Hi All, REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2816 We plan to separate two kinds of NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler/.../
Hi All, REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2816 We plan to separate two kinds of NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler/.../
|
By
Dandan Bi
·
|
|
[RFC]: StandAloneMM in OP-TEE
2 messages
Hi All, We are working on enabling the Secure Storage of Variables for Secure UEFI. Let me give you a brief idea of what we are doing. We need StandAlone Management Mode to run in the Secure Environme
Hi All, We are working on enabling the Secure Storage of Variables for Secure UEFI. Let me give you a brief idea of what we are doing. We need StandAlone Management Mode to run in the Secure Environme
|
By
Sahil Malhotra
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] [RFCv2] code-first process for UEFI-forum specifications
Leif, I received additional feedback on this proposal. We should add the UEFI Shell Specification to this new process. This includes adding a bugzilla.tianocore.org product category and a new Github r
Leif, I received additional feedback on this proposal. We should add the UEFI Shell Specification to this new process. This includes adding a bugzilla.tianocore.org product category and a new Github r
|
By
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
·
|
|
[EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
14 messages
Bret, Sorry for being confusing, and lazy..... The lazy part is in house we have a bug tracking tool called radar, so I just replaced radar with BZ to make a general point. So the scripts I mentioned
Bret, Sorry for being confusing, and lazy..... The lazy part is in house we have a bug tracking tool called radar, so I just replaced radar with BZ to make a general point. So the scripts I mentioned
|
By
Andrew Fish
·
|
|
[EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
13 messages
As a counterpoint: if we force a new branch or force push on every tweak, we lose the “thread” of discussion on what caused the change, what changed as a result, and the easy hook for the original cha
As a counterpoint: if we force a new branch or force push on every tweak, we lose the “thread” of discussion on what caused the change, what changed as a result, and the easy hook for the original cha
|
By
Bret Barkelew
·
|
|
[EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
2 messages
“But we do have tools that insert the Bugzilla number in all the commits of the series, assist with the squash, etc.” Are these internal-only, or are they something we could evaluate when we move to t
“But we do have tools that insert the Bugzilla number in all the commits of the series, assist with the squash, etc.” Are these internal-only, or are they something we could evaluate when we move to t
|
By
Bret Barkelew
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
6 messages
Rebecca, There is no difference between CI checks run during code review and the final CI checks before merge. I think it is an interesting conversation to decide how many times those CI checks should
Rebecca, There is no difference between CI checks run during code review and the final CI checks before merge. I think it is an interesting conversation to decide how many times those CI checks should
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
What's the difference between the CI that runs when a user submits the Pull Request, and the final CI checks that run before the request is merged? Also, I'm wondering why Mergify is being used instea
What's the difference between the CI that runs when a user submits the Pull Request, and the final CI checks that run before the request is merged? Also, I'm wondering why Mergify is being used instea
|
By
Rebecca Cran
·
|
|
[EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
You know what… That’s fair. Apologies to the community. - Bret Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 2:53 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Bret Barkelew<mailto:Bret.Barkelew@...>; Des
You know what… That’s fair. Apologies to the community. - Bret Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 2:53 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Bret Barkelew<mailto:Bret.Barkelew@...>; Des
|
By
Bret Barkelew
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
23 messages
Hi Bret, Which points are you disagreeing? IIUC it is easier for the "Instagram generation" to write a GitHub plugin which ping an unmerged pullrequest for them, rather than tracking their WiP and sen
Hi Bret, Which points are you disagreeing? IIUC it is easier for the "Instagram generation" to write a GitHub plugin which ping an unmerged pullrequest for them, rather than tracking their WiP and sen
|
By
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
·
|
|
[RFCv2] code-first process for UEFI-forum specifications
6 messages
Changes to v2 of this proposal: - Feedback from Laszlo[a] and Mike[b] incorporated. - I opted to view Mike's responses to Laszlo's questions as accepted, as no follow-up was made. Feedback from Felix[
Changes to v2 of this proposal: - Feedback from Laszlo[a] and Mike[b] incorporated. - I opted to view Mike's responses to Laszlo's questions as accepted, as no follow-up was made. Feedback from Felix[
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
|
|
[RFC] BaseTools/Source/Python as a standalone python package in independent repo
5 messages
Hello Tianocore Community, I’m submitting an RFC, proposing the movement of the basetools folder in edk2 to a separate repo and treated as a separate python project. We talked about it during the Apri
Hello Tianocore Community, I’m submitting an RFC, proposing the movement of the basetools folder in edk2 to a separate repo and treated as a separate python project. We talked about it during the Apri
|
By
Matthew Carlson
·
|