Currently, RngDxe in SecurityPkg only supports Intel, with RdRand support. This RFC is to start a discussion about adding support for ARM. I have a Git branch with support for the optional ARMv8.5 RND

In order to support Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) (https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/intel-trust-domain-extensions.html), we need a new Trust Domain Virtual Firmware

Which method is the least risky with regard to regressions, in your opinion? I tend to prefer #2. Either option is neutral for ArmVirtPkg at the moment, and option#2 is safer for OvmfPkg (no risk of r

Hi, All This email is to collect feedback about making one common EDK2 MM Core driver to support both MM Traditional drivers and MM Standalone drivers. We know that PI Spec defines two types of MM-rel

Why not move to edk2 repo? Thanks, Hot

Nate, I would actually propose you go further. In Project Mu we consume MinPlatform as its own repo. This is because it has its own lifetime and spans multiple product generations and hopefully someda

Hey Laszlo, With regard to the tool refactoring, Leif had the same feedback and I completely agree with both of you. I have filed a BZ to track the tool refactoring as a separate item: https://bugzill

Hi Everyone, This has come up informally a couple of times already, but I do think that it would be beneficial to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Platform/Intel folder and into a vendor neutral folder.

Hi Nate, totally agree with you. Best, Chris -- *Christian Walter* *Head of Firmware Development / Cyber Security * 9elements GmbH, Kortumstraße 19-21, 44787 Bochum, Germany Email: christian.walter@..

I think code review works. I’m primarily interested in seeing how much code falls under the “edk2” vs “edk2-staging” repos. - Bret Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 8:12 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mai

Hi Everyone, Given that we have removed FSP 1.x support from TianoCore in edk2-stable201908, it seems that the 1.x FSP binaries at https://github.com/intel/FSP have become increasingly limited in thei

Matthew, I’ll throw out some current developer centric ideas. 1) If you `source edksetup.sh` (edksetup.bat) you get the current behavior, and you add an argument you get the pip flavor? So maybe `edks

Hello all, A recent topic on the RFC mailing list went out and the work on moving Basetools/Sources/Python to a separate repo has started. See the RFC conversation here: https://edk2.groups.io/g/rfc/t

A version of this Wiki page is also provided here for review: https://github.com/mdkinney/edk2/wiki/EDK-II-Code-First-Process Mike

Hi, All In this RFC we're proposing slight changes to Git commit message format to make it more informative and more friendly for automation tools. Here is the list of changes proposed 1. Start subjec

Hi, I filed a proposal for a new library to handle UEFI BIOS sub-regions at https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2808. Attached is a slide deck with design overview of the new library. A UEF

Hello all, I'm new here, and was recommended to the TianoCore project by someone over at the UEFI forum. I've run across TianoCore before, and like the project. Before anyone gets worried by the subje

Hi, I am trying to test if the enrollment of Authenticated Variables is possible with verification of signature with different key sizes. File: AuthService.c :: Function: VerifyTimeBasedPayload() -> P

Hi All, REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2816 We plan to separate two kinds of NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler/.../

Hi All, We are working on enabling the Secure Storage of Variables for Secure UEFI. Let me give you a brief idea of what we are doing. We need StandAlone Management Mode to run in the Secure Environme