Leif, I received additional feedback on this proposal. We should add the UEFI Shell Specification to this new process. This includes adding a bugzilla.tianocore.org product category and a new Github r

Bret, Sorry for being confusing, and lazy..... The lazy part is in house we have a bug tracking tool called radar, so I just replaced radar with BZ to make a general point. So the scripts I mentioned

As a counterpoint: if we force a new branch or force push on every tweak, we lose the “thread” of discussion on what caused the change, what changed as a result, and the easy hook for the original cha

“But we do have tools that insert the Bugzilla number in all the commits of the series, assist with the squash, etc.” Are these internal-only, or are they something we could evaluate when we move to t

Rebecca, There is no difference between CI checks run during code review and the final CI checks before merge. I think it is an interesting conversation to decide how many times those CI checks should

What's the difference between the CI that runs when a user submits the Pull Request, and the final CI checks that run before the request is merged? Also, I'm wondering why Mergify is being used instea

You know what… That’s fair. Apologies to the community. - Bret Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 2:53 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Bret Barkelew<mailto:Bret.Barkelew@...>; Des

Hi Bret, Which points are you disagreeing? IIUC it is easier for the "Instagram generation" to write a GitHub plugin which ping an unmerged pullrequest for them, rather than tracking their WiP and sen

Changes to v2 of this proposal: - Feedback from Laszlo[a] and Mike[b] incorporated. - I opted to view Mike's responses to Laszlo's questions as accepted, as no follow-up was made. Feedback from Felix[

Hello Tianocore Community, I’m submitting an RFC, proposing the movement of the basetools folder in edk2 to a separate repo and treated as a separate python project. We talked about it during the Apri

That's because the proof-of-concept list is currently subscriber-only, and subscription requests have to be manually approved -- by Phil, or by me. The PoC list contains a bunch of webhook test messag

s/decryption/description/ (Because I'm assuming this will turn into a wiki article at some point.) s/make add/add/ Do I understand correctly that this recommends the contributor first push incremental

Hello, This is a proposal to change from the current email-based code review process to a GitHub pull request-based code review process for all repositories maintained in TianoCore. The current email-

Hello, we have found what we think is a BUG in OVMF, but wanted to run it by the rfc list first to confirm. We have discovered that the following virt-install command causes the latest OVMF code to fa

EDK2 community, (and CCing OptionRomPkg maintainers), ASIX (https://www.asix.com.tw/) has graciously contributed the source code of their latest USB NIC drivers to be up-streamed to TianoCore. The ori

Laszlo, Adding a PCD means platform integrators need to consider which value to set. Most of the time, they may just use the default PCD value. Then, why not we add the PCD later when a real case is m

Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>

This commit will reduce the interval of the AP status check event from 100 milliseconds to 10 milliseconds. (I searched the history of the 100ms interval, it seems no comment or log message was mentio

Hi Samer, I had, perhaps excessively, been waiting for more feedback. I promised Mike yesterday that I will rework based on feedback and send out next week at the latest. If people have no further com

Has there been any progress on this "code-first process" proposal? Any timeline on when we should expect it to be launched? Thanks, --Samer