Hi, All We plan to do a design review for TDVF in OVMF package. The TDVF Design slides for TinaoCore Design Review Meeting (Jun 11) is now available in blow link: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/files/

Laszlo: OK. I give the new proposed date for the release planning. SFF will be shorten to 5 days. HFF will be extended to 14 days. Date (00:00:00 UTC-8) Description 2021-05-28 Beginning of development

Laszlo: I understand this release requirement. Now, we have Feature Planning Freeze (1WW), Soft Feature Freeze (1WW) and Hard Feature Freeze (5 days). I would propose to remove Feature Planning Freeze

Hi, (1) I'm proposing an extension to the soft feature freeze and hard feature freeze announcements: https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/SoftFeatureFreeze#announcing-the-soft-feature

First, thank you I noticed the recent update to OpenSSL 1.1.1 recently. Of course they already have more fixes that can be picked up. Most will not impact secure boot, but for those that use the libra

Hi, I would like to ask you for review of following proposal. It will allow the user to specify which devices should be connected at the boot. User selection will be saved in variable and Boot Manager

Hello, I would like to ask you to review the proposal for new application for enrolling Secure Boot keys. The application uses content of PKDefault, KEKDefault, dbDefault, dbtDefault and dbxDefault to

All, + MdePkg maintainers Would like your input on the following UEFI spec ECR: Clarify NVMe and Infiniband device path EUI-64 byte order https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3338 (Thanks to

Any further comments on the ACPI ECR documented in: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335 ? I already have comments from Jeremey and Andrew saying it looks good. If there are no objectio

Hi Liming, Thank you very much for your feedback. I agree with your idea and it would be good to address this issue from UEFI interface instead of EDK2 interface. However, since there is nothing about

I vote the latter. - Bret Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:29 PM To: Sami Mujawar<mailto:Sami.Mujawar@...>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud<mailto:Samer.El-Haj-Ma

Nickle: Sorry for the late response. In fact, there is no UEFI interface between system browser and single HII module. EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL is edk2 implementation. This is not UEFI i

There is also the TRNG FW API, which is an architected SMC firmware interface: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0098/latest/ ________________________________ Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020,

Hi, RFC 7143 requires CHAP-MD5 as a mandatory option offered by an iscsi client (initiator). At the same time, edk2 has deprecated MD5 in general, as a cryptographically weak hash algorithm. Consequen

Hello Liming, Just a friendly reminder in case you miss this email. It seems to me that if we do not create the interface to disable HII hotkey, we still need some improvement to HII in order to addre

Hi Liming, Thanks for your comments. I got a chance to talk to option card vendor and they share two cases that HII driver is not able to support hotkey. 1) Driver cannot support hotkey to load defaul

Let me see what I can find… - Bret Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 3:37 AM To: Daniel P. Berrangé<mailto:berrange@...> Cc: Desimone, Nathaniel L<mailto:nathaniel.l.desimone@...>; rfc@edk2.groups.io<mailt

Hi edk2 Stewards, Is that ok to put some EDK2 Redfish port guide or design block diagrams in a folder under RedfishPkg? e.g. RedfishPkg/Documents? Any practices we have on the current edk2 repo? Thank

I just noticed this never got committed: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/.gitmodules still shows the old URL. -- Rebecca Cran

Nickle: > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: rfc@edk2.groups.io <rfc@edk2.groups.io> 代表 Nickle Wang > 发送时间: 2021年3月26日 12:05 > 收件人: rfc@edk2.groups.io; gaoliming@...; lersek@... > 抄送: 'Dandan Bi' <dandan.bi@...>;