|
Re: [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
Hi Nickle,
I also think Liming's suggest is good that add EFI_BROWSER_ACTION_REQUEST_XXX in UEFI spec to enable the communication between HII modules and Browser for the hot key status.
And each
Hi Nickle,
I also think Liming's suggest is good that add EFI_BROWSER_ACTION_REQUEST_XXX in UEFI spec to enable the communication between HII modules and Browser for the hot key status.
And each
|
By
Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@...>
·
#621
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Adding support for ARM (RNDR etc.) to RngDxe
Hi Rebecca,
I agree MdePkg/Library/BaseRngLib can be refactored to support both x86 and AArch64.
BaseRngLib would then be a RngLib instance that uses CPU instructions to provide random
Hi Rebecca,
I agree MdePkg/Library/BaseRngLib can be refactored to support both x86 and AArch64.
BaseRngLib would then be a RngLib instance that uses CPU instructions to provide random
|
By
Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
·
#620
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
Hi Liming,
Thank you very much for your feedback. I agree with your idea and it would be good to address this issue from UEFI interface instead of EDK2 interface. However, since there is nothing
Hi Liming,
Thank you very much for your feedback. I agree with your idea and it would be good to address this issue from UEFI interface instead of EDK2 interface. However, since there is nothing
|
By
Nickle Wang
·
#619
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-rfc] [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
Nickle:
Sorry for the late response. In fact, there is no UEFI interface between system browser and single HII module. EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL is edk2 implementation. This is not UEFI
Nickle:
Sorry for the late response. In fact, there is no UEFI interface between system browser and single HII module. EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL is edk2 implementation. This is not UEFI
|
By
gaoliming
·
#618
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Adding support for ARM (RNDR etc.) to RngDxe
I vote the latter.
- Bret
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:29 PM
To: Sami Mujawar<mailto:Sami.Mujawar@...>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Samer
I vote the latter.
- Bret
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:29 PM
To: Sami Mujawar<mailto:Sami.Mujawar@...>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Samer
|
By
Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
·
#617
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Adding support for ARM (RNDR etc.) to RngDxe
Hi Sami,
I've been looking through the design document again, and was wondering if the work I previously did will just slot in?
Were you thinking the "RngLib|RNDR" would go into ArmPkg (since it's
Hi Sami,
I've been looking through the design document again, and was wondering if the work I previously did will just slot in?
Were you thinking the "RngLib|RNDR" would go into ArmPkg (since it's
|
By
Rebecca Cran <rebecca@...>
·
#616
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Secure boot default key
I agree with Laszlo on this. Duplicating functionality violates DRY
and also could introduce major inconsistencies between how the tool
functions and how the firmware does the same. The only way
I agree with Laszlo on this. Duplicating functionality violates DRY
and also could introduce major inconsistencies between how the tool
functions and how the firmware does the same. The only way
|
By
Ethin Probst
·
#615
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Adding support for ARM (RNDR etc.) to RngDxe
Thanks. Yes, I'll work on implementing the RngLib|RNDR part.
I'll be using Qemu's sbsa-ref platform for testing. I'll also look into using the FVP_Base_AEMv8A-AEMv8A too.
--
Rebecca Cran
Thanks. Yes, I'll work on implementing the RngLib|RNDR part.
I'll be using Qemu's sbsa-ref platform for testing. I'll also look into using the FVP_Base_AEMv8A-AEMv8A too.
--
Rebecca Cran
|
By
Rebecca Cran <rebecca@...>
·
#614
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Secure boot default key
Hi Min Xu,
Yeah, the standalone tool is good and can bring the benefits you mentioned, but I'm still not clear on the standalone tool. Could you give us more information about the standalone tool? Do
Hi Min Xu,
Yeah, the standalone tool is good and can bring the benefits you mentioned, but I'm still not clear on the standalone tool. Could you give us more information about the standalone tool? Do
|
By
Sunny Wang
·
#613
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Secure boot default key
Yes, a standalone tool I mean is the one that directly add/modify default secure boot keys in the pre-build Var Store FV.
I also want to hear other people's opinions on this RFC.
Yes, VarEnroll.py is
Yes, a standalone tool I mean is the one that directly add/modify default secure boot keys in the pre-build Var Store FV.
I also want to hear other people's opinions on this RFC.
Yes, VarEnroll.py is
|
By
Min Xu <min.m.xu@...>
·
#612
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Secure boot default key
In discussions where I've been present over the last several years, such
a tool has been brought up several times. I always resist the idea.
Here's why:
- Such a host-side program needs to duplicate
In discussions where I've been present over the last several years, such
a tool has been brought up several times. I always resist the idea.
Here's why:
- Such a host-side program needs to duplicate
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#611
·
|
|
Re: removing CHAP-MD5 from IScsiDxe
Thanks!
Laszlo
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#610
·
|
|
Re: removing CHAP-MD5 from IScsiDxe
Hi Laszlo,
Based on the responses from Andrei and Bret (thanks!), MD5 should stay as a supported option in IScsiDxe.
I do understand that having a table with hash algorithms in IscsiDxe is a
Hi Laszlo,
Based on the responses from Andrei and Bret (thanks!), MD5 should stay as a supported option in IScsiDxe.
I do understand that having a table with hash algorithms in IscsiDxe is a
|
By
Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@...>
·
#609
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
Hello Liming,
Just a friendly reminder in case you miss this email. It seems to me that if we do not create the interface to disable HII hotkey, we still need some improvement to HII in order to
Hello Liming,
Just a friendly reminder in case you miss this email. It seems to me that if we do not create the interface to disable HII hotkey, we still need some improvement to HII in order to
|
By
Nickle Wang
·
#608
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Secure boot default key
Agree that it is a good idea to provide a mechanism to enroll the Secure boot keys.
But why not add a standalone tool in BaseTools? For example a Python scripts to enroll the Secure Boot keys. I
Agree that it is a good idea to provide a mechanism to enroll the Secure boot keys.
But why not add a standalone tool in BaseTools? For example a Python scripts to enroll the Secure Boot keys. I
|
By
Min Xu <min.m.xu@...>
·
#607
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Adding support for ARM (RNDR etc.) to RngDxe
Hi Rebecca,
I have been working on the following modules (See slide 11 in “EDKII - Proposed update to RNG
Hi Rebecca,
I have been working on the following modules (See slide 11 in “EDKII - Proposed update to RNG
|
By
Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
·
#606
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Adding support for ARM (RNDR etc.) to RngDxe
Hi Sami,
I was wondering if you're still collecting feedback on the design, or if you have a plan and schedule for the implementation?
--
Rebecca Cran
Hi Sami,
I was wondering if you're still collecting feedback on the design, or if you have a plan and schedule for the implementation?
--
Rebecca Cran
|
By
Rebecca Cran <rebecca@...>
·
#605
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Secure boot default key
Hi Laszlo,
Thanks a lot for your review. I will wait some time for more comments
and I will send an updated design.
thanks,
greg
pt., 16 kwi 2021 o 14:16 Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
Hi Laszlo,
Thanks a lot for your review. I will wait some time for more comments
and I will send an updated design.
thanks,
greg
pt., 16 kwi 2021 o 14:16 Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
|
By
Grzegorz Bernacki
·
#604
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Secure boot default key
Adding SecurityPkg and Arm maintainers
Adding SecurityPkg and Arm maintainers
|
By
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
·
#603
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Secure boot default key
You could perhaps introduce DSC and FDF snippets (include files) too,
under SecurityPkg, so that any platform utilizing this feature do so
through identical macro names.
Thanks
Laszlo
You could perhaps introduce DSC and FDF snippets (include files) too,
under SecurityPkg, so that any platform utilizing this feature do so
through identical macro names.
Thanks
Laszlo
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#602
·
|