|
Re: [PATCH] q35: lpc: allow to lock down 128K RAM at default SMBASE address
[...]
I thought it could be a register on the new CPU hotplug controller that
we're going to need anyway (if I understand correctly, at least).
But:
Yes, that should work.
In fact, I had
[...]
I thought it could be a register on the new CPU hotplug controller that
we're going to need anyway (if I understand correctly, at least).
But:
Yes, that should work.
In fact, I had
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#136
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Error reporting upon SecureBoot image validation failures?
A special case of your question is covered, at the moment, as follows
("give users an indication of the image validation failure"):
- When a UEFI boot option is rejected due to secure boot
A special case of your question is covered, at the moment, as follows
("give users an indication of the image validation failure"):
- When a UEFI boot option is rejected due to secure boot
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#135
·
|
|
[RFC] Error reporting upon SecureBoot image validation failures?
Hello, I have a question about user error reporting during SecureBoot image validation.
From my testing with OVMF/Secureboot, when an image to be loaded fails validation (i.e. due to missing or
Hello, I have a question about user error reporting during SecureBoot image validation.
From my testing with OVMF/Secureboot, when an image to be loaded fails validation (i.e. due to missing or
|
By
Aaron Young
·
#134
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
I've posted this to the largest forum of blind visually impaired
people I know of to date and have gotten some excellent feedback from
them. I also provided in that post a link to this discussion.
I've posted this to the largest forum of blind visually impaired
people I know of to date and have gotten some excellent feedback from
them. I also provided in that post a link to this discussion.
|
By
Ethin Probst
·
#133
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Hi Ethin and all
As Leif mentioned, my mastering thesys was the implementation of a
reference code so a driver for audio at pre-OS would be possible,
eliminating the first barrier for the creation of
Hi Ethin and all
As Leif mentioned, my mastering thesys was the implementation of a
reference code so a driver for audio at pre-OS would be possible,
eliminating the first barrier for the creation of
|
By
Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...>
·
#132
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Woops, I just realized while reading my message after I'd sent it that
I had linked to the wrong document. The priority system is outlined
over here (https://freebsoft.org/doc/speechd/ssip.html#Top).
Woops, I just realized while reading my message after I'd sent it that
I had linked to the wrong document. The priority system is outlined
over here (https://freebsoft.org/doc/speechd/ssip.html#Top).
|
By
Ethin Probst
·
#131
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
While conquering refreshable braille displays would be nice, I think
we should take it in stages. (Some blind people would want this in
along with the accessibility subsystems, however I do not
While conquering refreshable braille displays would be nice, I think
we should take it in stages. (Some blind people would want this in
along with the accessibility subsystems, however I do not
|
By
Ethin Probst
·
#130
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Hi Ethin,
Apologies for the delay in responding - I personally don't tend to
read the RFC list (and I know that applies to some other developers
who have now subscribed).
So, first of all, I need to
Hi Ethin,
Apologies for the delay in responding - I personally don't tend to
read the RFC list (and I know that applies to some other developers
who have now subscribed).
So, first of all, I need to
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#129
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] q35: lpc: allow to lock down 128K RAM at default SMBASE address
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...> wrote:
It looks like fwcfg smi feature negotiation isn't reusable in this case.
I'd prefer not to add another device just for another SMI
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...> wrote:
It looks like fwcfg smi feature negotiation isn't reusable in this case.
I'd prefer not to add another device just for another SMI
|
By
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...>
·
#128
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] q35: lpc: allow to lock down 128K RAM at default SMBASE address
Sorry, there's a typo above: I pasted "smbase-blackhole" twice. The
second instance was meant to be "smbase-window". I checked all instances
of both regions in the info mtree output, I just fumbled
Sorry, there's a typo above: I pasted "smbase-blackhole" twice. The
second instance was meant to be "smbase-window". I checked all instances
of both regions in the info mtree output, I just fumbled
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#127
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] q35: lpc: allow to lock down 128K RAM at default SMBASE address
Hi Igor,
Tying the [0x30000+128K) lockdown to the broadcast SMI negotiation is a
simplification for QEMU, but it is a complication for OVMF.
(This QEMU patch ties those things together in effect
Hi Igor,
Tying the [0x30000+128K) lockdown to the broadcast SMI negotiation is a
simplification for QEMU, but it is a complication for OVMF.
(This QEMU patch ties those things together in effect
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#126
·
|
|
Re: UEFI terminal console keyboard type extend for Putty
By
Gao, Zhichao
·
#125
·
|
|
Re: UEFI terminal console keyboard type extend for Putty
By
Gao, Zhichao
·
#124
·
|
|
Re: UEFI terminal console keyboard type extend for Putty
Another specific question: What's the meaning of "F1 and F2 don't work in UEFI Shell"? That sounds like a bug in Terminal driver.
Another specific question: What's the meaning of "F1 and F2 don't work in UEFI Shell"? That sounds like a bug in Terminal driver.
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#123
·
|
|
Re: UEFI terminal console keyboard type extend for Putty
Zhichao,
Can you please summarize what terminal types are supported by EDKII Terminal driver today and what you are going to add through this RFC?
For the newly added terminal types, where is the
Zhichao,
Can you please summarize what terminal types are supported by EDKII Terminal driver today and what you are going to add through this RFC?
For the newly added terminal types, where is the
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#122
·
|
|
Re: UEFI terminal console keyboard type extend for Putty
Liming,
All the three types will be introduced.
By the way, fix one typo 'F4' for VT400 map key should be 'ESC [ 1 4 ~'.
Thanks,
Zhichao
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 3:51 PM
To: Gao, Zhichao
Liming,
All the three types will be introduced.
By the way, fix one typo 'F4' for VT400 map key should be 'ESC [ 1 4 ~'.
Thanks,
Zhichao
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 3:51 PM
To: Gao, Zhichao
|
By
Gao, Zhichao
·
#121
·
|
|
Re: UEFI terminal console keyboard type extend for Putty
Zhichao:
One clarification. What terminal type will be introduced? Xterm, VT400 and Linux?
Thanks
Liming
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2019 12:56 PM
To: rfc@edk2.groups.io
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io;
Zhichao:
One clarification. What terminal type will be introduced? Xterm, VT400 and Linux?
Thanks
Liming
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2019 12:56 PM
To: rfc@edk2.groups.io
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io;
|
By
Liming Gao
·
#120
·
|
|
UEFI terminal console keyboard type extend for Putty
Hi everyone,
Putty is a popular terminal console software in windows and it support various types of terminal keyboard type. I would like to add most of the type support. Here is the key map info.
Hi everyone,
Putty is a popular terminal console software in windows and it support various types of terminal keyboard type. I would like to add most of the type support. Here is the key map info.
|
By
Gao, Zhichao
·
#119
·
|
|
[PATCH] q35: lpc: allow to lock down 128K RAM at default SMBASE address
lpc already has SMI negotiation feature, extend it by adding
optin ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_LOCKED_SMBASE_BIT to supported features.
Writing this bit into "etc/smi/requested-features" fw_cfg file,
tells QEMU
lpc already has SMI negotiation feature, extend it by adding
optin ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_LOCKED_SMBASE_BIT to supported features.
Writing this bit into "etc/smi/requested-features" fw_cfg file,
tells QEMU
|
By
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...>
·
#118
·
|
|
Re: [Qemu-devel] [edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] CPU hotplug using SMM with QEMU+OVMF
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...> wrote:
I guess we at point where patch is better then words, I'll send one as reply here shortly.
I've just implemented subset of above (opened, closed+locked).
I
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...> wrote:
I guess we at point where patch is better then words, I'll send one as reply here shortly.
I've just implemented subset of above (opened, closed+locked).
I
|
By
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...>
·
#117
·
|