Date   
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Ethin Probst · #189 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address By Laszlo Ersek · #188 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1 By Sean · #187 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address By Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...> · #186 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1 By rebecca@... · #185 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1 By Sean · #184 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address By Laszlo Ersek · #183 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...> · #182 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Andrew Fish <afish@...> · #181 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...> · #180 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address By Yao, Jiewen · #179 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address By Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...> · #178 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address By Laszlo Ersek · #177 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Andrew Fish <afish@...> · #176 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Ethin Probst · #175 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...> · #174 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Andrew Fish <afish@...> · #173 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Ethin Probst · #172 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...> · #171 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Andrew Fish <afish@...> · #170 ·
601 - 620 of 789