|
Re: [RFC] Request for new git repository for EdkRepo
I am fine with a new repo. This also supports a good workflow to get a tool that then lets you pull full platforms. In theory you would only ever really need to clone a single repo manually
I am fine with a new repo. This also supports a good workflow to get a tool that then lets you pull full platforms. In theory you would only ever really need to clone a single repo manually
|
By
Bjorge, Erik C
·
#416
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Request to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Intel folder
Hi Nate,
Very positive to this on the whole.
I have only been following MinPlatformPkg peripherally - at the time
it was merged, I did not have the bandwidth to look into it and help
make it
Hi Nate,
Very positive to this on the whole.
I have only been following MinPlatformPkg peripherally - at the time
it was merged, I did not have the bandwidth to look into it and help
make it
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#415
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Request to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Intel folder
We have recently been evaluating the merits of MinPlatformPkg. We would welcome a MinPlatformPkg that is more accessible.
GARRETT KIRKENDALL
SMTS Firmware Engineer
7171 Southwest Parkway, Austin, TX
We have recently been evaluating the merits of MinPlatformPkg. We would welcome a MinPlatformPkg that is more accessible.
GARRETT KIRKENDALL
SMTS Firmware Engineer
7171 Southwest Parkway, Austin, TX
|
By
Kirkendall, Garrett
·
#414
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Request to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Intel folder
Since I've been CC'd -- the MinPlatformPkg move seems logical to me.
Regarding the tools, I guess it depends on how many Intel-specific
quirks they contain. I guess they could be moved too after a
Since I've been CC'd -- the MinPlatformPkg move seems logical to me.
Regarding the tools, I guess it depends on how many Intel-specific
quirks they contain. I guess they could be moved too after a
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#413
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Request to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Intel folder
That makes sense to move out MinPlatformPkg to under the vendor neutral folder if it is not Intel specific. On RISC-V, we have Platforms/RISC-V/PlatformPkg and the vendor neutral folder of RISC-V
That makes sense to move out MinPlatformPkg to under the vendor neutral folder if it is not Intel specific. On RISC-V, we have Platforms/RISC-V/PlatformPkg and the vendor neutral folder of RISC-V
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#412
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Request for new git repository for EdkRepo
Hi Erik,
A separate manifest repository would probably be a good idea. The manifest repo is used for a lot of EdkRepo's operations so having a smaller repo dedicated repo could be beneficial from a
Hi Erik,
A separate manifest repository would probably be a good idea. The manifest repo is used for a lot of EdkRepo's operations so having a smaller repo dedicated repo could be beneficial from a
|
By
Nate DeSimone
·
#411
·
|
|
[RFC] Request to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Intel folder
Hi Everyone,
This has come up informally a couple of times already, but I do think that it would be beneficial to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Platform/Intel folder and into a vendor neutral
Hi Everyone,
This has come up informally a couple of times already, but I do think that it would be beneficial to move MinPlatformPkg out of the Platform/Intel folder and into a vendor neutral
|
By
Nate DeSimone
·
#410
·
|
|
[RFC] Request for new git repository for EdkRepo
Hi Everyone,
Given that EdkRepo has existed in the project for over a year now (in edk2-staging) I think it is time to get out of staging. I have considered multiple possible landing zones:
1.
Hi Everyone,
Given that EdkRepo has existed in the project for over a year now (in edk2-staging) I think it is time to get out of staging. I have considered multiple possible landing zones:
1.
|
By
Nate DeSimone
·
#409
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
By
Abner Chang
·
#408
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
By
Abner Chang
·
#407
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
That would take time to run through the process of publishing this tool (make it as public) on DMTF. I just created the reference of source code which generated by tool on my personal GitHub (not the
That would take time to run through the process of publishing this tool (make it as public) on DMTF. I just created the reference of source code which generated by tool on my personal GitHub (not the
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#406
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
Hi Felix,
Yes, Redfish (EFI Redfish Discover Protocol) relies on the EFI REST EX protocol instance which provides EFI_REST_EX_SERVICE_REDFISH type service as defined in UEFI spec 29.7.2.2
Hi Felix,
Yes, Redfish (EFI Redfish Discover Protocol) relies on the EFI REST EX protocol instance which provides EFI_REST_EX_SERVICE_REDFISH type service as defined in UEFI spec 29.7.2.2
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#405
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
Sure Jiewen, we plan to talk about this on Tianocore design meeting recently. But I may not provide the reference here because it may against to the Redfish working group regulations.
I had requested
Sure Jiewen, we plan to talk about this on Tianocore design meeting recently. But I may not provide the reference here because it may against to the Redfish working group regulations.
I had requested
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#404
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
Hmm. You probably have to join dmtf as a member. That repo is private for members now, not public yet.
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
________________________________
Sent: Tuesday,
Hmm. You probably have to join dmtf as a member. That repo is private for members now, not public yet.
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
________________________________
Sent: Tuesday,
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#403
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
No, EFI REST JSON Structure DXE Driver (UEF spec section 29.7.3) is a centralized manager to manage "EFI Redfish JSON resource to C structure Converter libraries/drivers" for converting Redfish
No, EFI REST JSON Structure DXE Driver (UEF spec section 29.7.3) is a centralized manager to manage "EFI Redfish JSON resource to C structure Converter libraries/drivers" for converting Redfish
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#402
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
Not many drivers fall in edk2 repo so far, those are drivers with the corresponding definitions in UEFI spec.
- EFI REST EX UEFI Driver for Redfish service
- EFI Redfish Discover
Not many drivers fall in edk2 repo so far, those are drivers with the corresponding definitions in UEFI spec.
- EFI REST EX UEFI Driver for Redfish service
- EFI Redfish Discover
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#401
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
Seems no one has comment on this topic. Let's just go through the code review process.
Thanks
Abner
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 11:02 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; rfc@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Wang,
Seems no one has comment on this topic. Let's just go through the code review process.
Thanks
Abner
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 11:02 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; rfc@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Wang,
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#400
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
Good to know.
Then I recommend we document assumption in the design.
I prefer to change "As the design, any BIOS to Redfish communicate should be done before End of DXE and with SecureBoot is
Good to know.
Then I recommend we document assumption in the design.
I prefer to change "As the design, any BIOS to Redfish communicate should be done before End of DXE and with SecureBoot is
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#399
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
Thank you, Abner.
I look forward to the design review in next week. :-)
I notice that the last RedfishPkg update is still 2 years ago.
In order to move staging to master, we need ensure the code
Thank you, Abner.
I look forward to the design review in next week. :-)
I notice that the last RedfishPkg update is still 2 years ago.
In order to move staging to master, we need ensure the code
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#398
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Request for the new package "RedfishPkg" under edk2 repo
Abner,
Are there RedFish dependencies in the REST EX Driver from your package?
If not, perhaps it should be in the NetworkPkg, not in the RedFishPkg.
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 11:12 PM
To:
Abner,
Are there RedFish dependencies in the REST EX Driver from your package?
If not, perhaps it should be in the NetworkPkg, not in the RedFishPkg.
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 11:12 PM
To:
|
By
Felix Polyudov
·
#397
·
|