|
Re: removing CHAP-MD5 from IScsiDxe
Laszlo,
I do appreciate analysis - thorough as always :)
To points:
* 1, 2, 3 - That would be inevitable in order to properly introduce
other hash algorithms for CHAP. Adding multiple CHAP hash
Laszlo,
I do appreciate analysis - thorough as always :)
To points:
* 1, 2, 3 - That would be inevitable in order to properly introduce
other hash algorithms for CHAP. Adding multiple CHAP hash
|
By
Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@...>
·
#594
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Documents under RedfishPkg
Thanks Mike and Laszlo for the comments.
I would have the readme markdown under RedfishPkg with SVG for the complex diagrams. PlantUML is good to the porting guide markdown for easy review.
Abner
Thanks Mike and Laszlo for the comments.
I would have the readme markdown under RedfishPkg with SVG for the complex diagrams. PlantUML is good to the porting guide markdown for easy review.
Abner
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#593
·
|
|
Re: removing CHAP-MD5 from IScsiDxe
Maciej,
Looking at the code for a few hours, I've had the following (roundabout)
thought process.
(1) The IScsiCHAP.[hc] files hardwire the MD5 dependency, including
direct MD5 API calls to
Maciej,
Looking at the code for a few hours, I've had the following (roundabout)
thought process.
(1) The IScsiCHAP.[hc] files hardwire the MD5 dependency, including
direct MD5 API calls to
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#592
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Documents under RedfishPkg
Hi Abner,
PlantUML is a way to embed some graphics in GitHub markdown text. Avoids checking in SVG or BMP or PNG binaries.
https://plantuml.com/
https://plantuml.com/en/guide
Here is an
Hi Abner,
PlantUML is a way to embed some graphics in GitHub markdown text. Avoids checking in SVG or BMP or PNG binaries.
https://plantuml.com/
https://plantuml.com/en/guide
Here is an
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#591
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
Hi Rebecca,
Thank you for the reminder. I have entered a BZ and sent a patch for review
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3301
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/73744
Mike
Hi Rebecca,
Thank you for the reminder. I have entered a BZ and sent a patch for review
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3301
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/73744
Mike
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#590
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-rfc] removing CHAP-MD5 from IScsiDxe
Let me see what I can find…
- Bret
Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 3:37 AM
To: Daniel P. Berrangé<mailto:berrange@...>
Cc: Desimone, Nathaniel L<mailto:nathaniel.l.desimone@...>;
Let me see what I can find…
- Bret
Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 3:37 AM
To: Daniel P. Berrangé<mailto:berrange@...>
Cc: Desimone, Nathaniel L<mailto:nathaniel.l.desimone@...>;
|
By
Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
·
#589
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Documents under RedfishPkg
If you can add the documents in some text-based representation (markup
or plaintext), where "reviewing patches" will make sense in the future,
then I welcome adding the documentation under
If you can add the documents in some text-based representation (markup
or plaintext), where "reviewing patches" will make sense in the future,
then I welcome adding the documentation under
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#588
·
|
|
Re: removing CHAP-MD5 from IScsiDxe
+Bret, Sean, Jose
Hi Sean, Bret,
In one of previous threads, Jose wrote that he pointed you to a Microsoft person who should have more information on iSCSI on Windows.
I am wondering whether Windows
+Bret, Sean, Jose
Hi Sean, Bret,
In one of previous threads, Jose wrote that he pointed you to a Microsoft person who should have more information on iSCSI on Windows.
I am wondering whether Windows
|
By
Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@...>
·
#587
·
|
|
Re: removing CHAP-MD5 from IScsiDxe
Linux kernel gained support for the SHA* family of hashes:
commit a572d24af4d16e70743feb0b4decb17aaae7ce43
Author: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...>
Date: Mon Oct 28 13:38:20 2019
Linux kernel gained support for the SHA* family of hashes:
commit a572d24af4d16e70743feb0b4decb17aaae7ce43
Author: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...>
Date: Mon Oct 28 13:38:20 2019
|
By
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@...>
·
#586
·
|
|
Re: removing CHAP-MD5 from IScsiDxe
Hi,
Sorry for the very late response.
Dropping iSCSI overall is a no-go - too many users + this is the only remote block I/O we seem to support in EDKII.
As for RFC compliance vs EDKII policy on
Hi,
Sorry for the very late response.
Dropping iSCSI overall is a no-go - too many users + this is the only remote block I/O we seem to support in EDKII.
As for RFC compliance vs EDKII policy on
|
By
Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@...>
·
#585
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-rfc] [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
Nickle:
Browser implementation may be different. Please see the message https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/73511
So, you mean in form open callback to disable hotkey in form level. Once exit
Nickle:
Browser implementation may be different. Please see the message https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/73511
So, you mean in form open callback to disable hotkey in form level. Once exit
|
By
gaoliming
·
#584
·
|
|
[RFC] Documents under RedfishPkg
Hi edk2 Stewards,
Is that ok to put some EDK2 Redfish port guide or design block diagrams in a folder under RedfishPkg? e.g. RedfishPkg/Documents?
Any practices we have on the current edk2
Hi edk2 Stewards,
Is that ok to put some EDK2 Redfish port guide or design block diagrams in a folder under RedfishPkg? e.g. RedfishPkg/Documents?
Any practices we have on the current edk2
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#583
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
Thanks for your feedback, Liming. Please see my comment below.
Thanks for your feedback, Liming. Please see my comment below.
|
By
Nickle Wang
·
#582
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-rfc] [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
Nickle:
So, your proposal is to let HII driver call new API to disable or enable Hotkey on its page.
There are still some issues here.
1. UEFI option rom driver is the independent driver. It refers
Nickle:
So, your proposal is to let HII driver call new API to disable or enable Hotkey on its page.
There are still some issues here.
1. UEFI option rom driver is the independent driver. It refers
|
By
gaoliming
·
#581
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
By
Nickle Wang
·
#580
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
Sure, I'm not pushing for that; just if it were possible with VFR out of
the box, it would be a good choice.
Thanks
Laszlo
Sure, I'm not pushing for that; just if it were possible with VFR out of
the box, it would be a good choice.
Thanks
Laszlo
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#579
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-rfc] [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
UEFI driver write guide 12.6.1 Minimize callbacks section defines the guide line.
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/UEFI-Driver-Writer%27s-Guide
But, some HII drivers still like
UEFI driver write guide 12.6.1 Minimize callbacks section defines the guide line.
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/UEFI-Driver-Writer%27s-Guide
But, some HII drivers still like
|
By
gaoliming
·
#578
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
Thanks for your feedback, Laszlo. I like the idea to support hotkey from VFR level. However, I checked the UEFI driver writer guide and I do not see anything about HII hotkey.
In terms of hotkey
Thanks for your feedback, Laszlo. I like the idea to support hotkey from VFR level. However, I checked the UEFI driver writer guide and I do not see anything about HII hotkey.
In terms of hotkey
|
By
Nickle Wang
·
#577
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
I agree with the problem statement. I've noticed this too, and found it
confusing.
I wonder if there are HII guidelines or best known practices to deal
with it -- I assume that one desirable solution
I agree with the problem statement. I've noticed this too, and found it
confusing.
I wonder if there are HII guidelines or best known practices to deal
with it -- I assume that one desirable solution
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#576
·
|
|
[RFC] Have new interface in EDKII_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION2_PROTOCOL to disable hotkey support
Hi All,
I am having trouble to disable hotkey support in HII browser with existing interface. I am wondering if we could have new interface to disable hotkey support in form browser extension2
Hi All,
I am having trouble to disable hotkey support in HII browser with existing interface. I am wondering if we could have new interface to disable hotkey support in form browser extension2
|
By
Nickle Wang
·
#575
·
|