|
[RFC] Update NASM tool version to 2.15.05 for build image
Hi All,
This email is to collect feedback about update NASM version to 2.15.05 for build image.
NASM (https://nasm.us/) is an assembler for the x86 CPU architecture platform.
Current open CI is using
Hi All,
This email is to collect feedback about update NASM version to 2.15.05 for build image.
NASM (https://nasm.us/) is an assembler for the x86 CPU architecture platform.
Current open CI is using
|
By
Sheng Wei
·
#482
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Adding support for ARM (RNDR etc.) to RngDxe
Hi All,
I have shared some initial thoughts on the RNG implementation updates at
Hi All,
I have shared some initial thoughts on the RNG implementation updates at
|
By
Sami Mujawar
·
#481
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Adding support for ARM (RNDR etc.) to RngDxe
Hi Sami,
I don't see any further discussions on this. Have you made any progress with sharing the design documents or scheduling a review?
--
Rebecca Cran
Hi Sami,
I don't see any further discussions on this. Have you made any progress with sharing the design documents or scheduling a review?
--
Rebecca Cran
|
By
Rebecca Cran <rebecca@...>
·
#480
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
Rebecca:
My new mail address is Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>. It has updated in Maintainers.txt.
Thanks
Liming
Rebecca:
My new mail address is Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>. It has updated in Maintainers.txt.
Thanks
Liming
|
By
gaoliming
·
#479
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
By the way, I've started getting bounces from Liming's Intel email address.
--
Rebecca Cran
By the way, I've started getting bounces from Liming's Intel email address.
--
Rebecca Cran
|
By
Rebecca Cran
·
#478
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
Yes, that's fine with me.
--
Rebecca Cran
Yes, that's fine with me.
--
Rebecca Cran
|
By
Rebecca Cran
·
#477
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
Rebecca,
Are you ok with using a GitHub mirror?
Mike
Rebecca,
Are you ok with using a GitHub mirror?
Mike
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#476
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
I also prefer to fetch all submodules from github. Then, all git repos will have the same behavior.
Thanks
Liming
I also prefer to fetch all submodules from github. Then, all git repos will have the same behavior.
Thanks
Liming
|
By
gaoliming
·
#475
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-rfc] [RFC V3] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
Mike:
It is OK to me. I have no other comments.
Thanks
Liming
Mike:
It is OK to me. I have no other comments.
Thanks
Liming
|
By
gaoliming
·
#474
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
I'd suggest just using the Gitlab mirror. Unlike cryptomilk.org, Gitlab should be just as reliable as Github and won't introduce another potential failure point.
--
Rebecca Cran
I'd suggest just using the Gitlab mirror. Unlike cryptomilk.org, Gitlab should be just as reliable as Github and won't introduce another potential failure point.
--
Rebecca Cran
|
By
Rebecca Cran
·
#473
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
I like it.
- Bret
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2020 10:59 AM
To: rfc@edk2.groups.io<mailto:rfc@edk2.groups.io>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Bret
I like it.
- Bret
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2020 10:59 AM
To: rfc@edk2.groups.io<mailto:rfc@edk2.groups.io>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Bret
|
By
Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
·
#472
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
Hello,
There have been a few suggestions to create a mirror of cmocka in TianoCore
org in GitHub.
I have found a GitHub action that can do a repo sync.
Hello,
There have been a few suggestions to create a mirror of cmocka in TianoCore
org in GitHub.
I have found a GitHub action that can do a repo sync.
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#471
·
|
|
[RFC V3] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
Hello,
The following bug has been fixed on edk2/master
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1226
This bug is also considered a
Hello,
The following bug has been fixed on edk2/master
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1226
This bug is also considered a
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#470
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RFC V2] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
I agree that the default policy is to only support a branch until the next
stable tag. My comments were only to address the potential for a request
after that defined support timeline. If a portion
I agree that the default policy is to only support a branch until the next
stable tag. My comments were only to address the potential for a request
after that defined support timeline. If a portion
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#469
·
|
|
回复: [RFC V2] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
Mike:
This case is clear. One commit is for the bug fix, another is for the unit test.
If the unit test is also important for this fix, it can be cherry-pick. I understand the critical bug fix is
Mike:
This case is clear. One commit is for the bug fix, another is for the unit test.
If the unit test is also important for this fix, it can be cherry-pick. I understand the critical bug fix is
|
By
gaoliming
·
#468
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
Mike:
I review all submodules in edk2. They are all from github except for cmocka. So, I agree to use github mirror for cmocka.
Thanks
Liming
Mike:
I review all submodules in edk2. They are all from github except for cmocka. So, I agree to use github mirror for cmocka.
Thanks
Liming
|
By
gaoliming
·
#467
·
|
|
回复: [RFC V2] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
Mike:
[Liming] This one is for unit test. It is not critical fix. I don't think it is required.
Here is my suggestion on the live period of the stable tag branch.
The stable tag branch will be
Mike:
[Liming] This one is for unit test. It is not critical fix. I don't think it is required.
Here is my suggestion on the live period of the stable tag branch.
The stable tag branch will be
|
By
gaoliming
·
#466
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RFC V2] Create supported branch from edk2-stable* tag (Required to address critical bug BZ3111)
“I agree with Liming that stable branches should have a predefined
lifetime. Keeping stable branches regression-free is very difficult and
ungrateful work, and the community should not have
“I agree with Liming that stable branches should have a predefined
lifetime. Keeping stable branches regression-free is very difficult and
ungrateful work, and the community should not have
|
By
Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
·
#465
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-rfc] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
My vote is to own a fork. I agree with Laszlo that it’s very low maintenance (may even be able to automate it with an existing DevOps pipeline to run every day) and gives us the most control of our
My vote is to own a fork. I agree with Laszlo that it’s very low maintenance (may even be able to automate it with an existing DevOps pipeline to run every day) and gives us the most control of our
|
By
Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
·
#464
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives
Also, apparently Neverware is part of Google:
https://cloudreadykb.neverware.com/s/article/Neverware-is-now-part-of-Google-FAQ
--
Rebecca Cran
Also, apparently Neverware is part of Google:
https://cloudreadykb.neverware.com/s/article/Neverware-is-now-part-of-Google-FAQ
--
Rebecca Cran
|
By
Rebecca Cran <rebecca@...>
·
#463
·
|