|
Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] MdeModulePkg/StatusCodeHandler: Separate NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler modules
Hi Brian,
Personally, I prefer to add the NULL class Library to StatusCodeHandler modules.
1. I think we should make the functionality of each module clear and separated. It may also be why we
Hi Brian,
Personally, I prefer to add the NULL class Library to StatusCodeHandler modules.
1. I think we should make the functionality of each module clear and separated. It may also be why we
|
By
Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@...>
·
#356
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] MdeModulePkg/StatusCodeHandler: Separate NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler modules
By
Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@...>
·
#355
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] MdeModulePkg/StatusCodeHandler: Separate NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler modules
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2020 1:29 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Bi, Dandan <dandan.bi@...>; rfc@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@...>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@...>; Wang, Jian J
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2020 1:29 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Bi, Dandan <dandan.bi@...>; rfc@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@...>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@...>; Wang, Jian J
|
By
Dong, Eric <eric.dong@...>
·
#354
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] MdeModulePkg/StatusCodeHandler: Separate NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler modules
I think the need to execute from ROM makes this tricky.
It looks to me that it is easy to move from PCD to libs for the StatusCodeHandler since registration is basically `RscHandlerPpi->Register
I think the need to execute from ROM makes this tricky.
It looks to me that it is easy to move from PCD to libs for the StatusCodeHandler since registration is basically `RscHandlerPpi->Register
|
By
Andrew Fish <afish@...>
·
#353
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] MdeModulePkg/StatusCodeHandler: Separate NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler modules
Dandan,
We'll have a lot of layers of indirection.... The ReportStatusCodeRouter modules will call one or more StatusCodeHandlerModules, and the standard StatusCodeHandler modules will call
Dandan,
We'll have a lot of layers of indirection.... The ReportStatusCodeRouter modules will call one or more StatusCodeHandlerModules, and the standard StatusCodeHandler modules will call
|
By
Brian J. Johnson
·
#352
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] MdeModulePkg/StatusCodeHandler: Separate NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler modules
So I assume you're going to remove PcdStatusCodeUseSerial and
PcdStatusCodeUseMemory, and when converting the existent platforms, the
new NULL class resolutions in the DSC files will reflect the
So I assume you're going to remove PcdStatusCodeUseSerial and
PcdStatusCodeUseMemory, and when converting the existent platforms, the
new NULL class resolutions in the DSC files will reflect the
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#351
·
|
|
[edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] MdeModulePkg/StatusCodeHandler: Separate NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler modules
Hi All,
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
We plan to separate two kinds of NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from
Hi All,
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
We plan to separate two kinds of NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from
|
By
Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@...>
·
#350
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] [RFCv2] code-first process for UEFI-forum specifications
Leif,
I received additional feedback on this proposal.
We should add the UEFI Shell Specification to this new process. This includes adding a bugzilla.tianocore.org product category and a new Github
Leif,
I received additional feedback on this proposal.
We should add the UEFI Shell Specification to this new process. This includes adding a bugzilla.tianocore.org product category and a new Github
|
By
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
·
#349
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
Rebecca,
I was able to confirm that it was an issue with Git for Windows. Looks like it’s fixed in current snapshots and will be in the next
Rebecca,
I was able to confirm that it was an issue with Git for Windows. Looks like it’s fixed in current snapshots and will be in the next
|
By
Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
·
#348
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
That's different -- in this case, peer certificate verification was
attempted, but it failed, because the root certificate in the peer's
cert chain is not trusted by your system (your openSUSE WSL
That's different -- in this case, peer certificate verification was
attempted, but it failed, because the root certificate in the peer's
cert chain is not trusted by your system (your openSUSE WSL
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#347
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
That’s not a bad idea: I should try with my WSL install.
I’m on the same version of Git for Windows, and think I’ll open it as an issue to the maintainer.
For now, going though the paces is
That’s not a bad idea: I should try with my WSL install.
I’m on the same version of Git for Windows, and think I’ll open it as an issue to the maintainer.
For now, going though the paces is
|
By
Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
·
#346
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
Rebecca,
I cheated and used smtpServer = relay.apple.com and smtpEncryption = tls. Seems relay.apple.com does not require authentication and it just worked.
I used an internal git mailing list to
Rebecca,
I cheated and used smtpServer = relay.apple.com and smtpEncryption = tls. Seems relay.apple.com does not require authentication and it just worked.
I used an internal git mailing list to
|
By
Andrew Fish <afish@...>
·
#345
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
I'm getting the same error, but with a different packaging of Git: mine's in C:\Program Files\Git\cmd\git.exe .
It's version "git version 2.26.2.windows.1".
Of course it's possible it's just the
I'm getting the same error, but with a different packaging of Git: mine's in C:\Program Files\Git\cmd\git.exe .
It's version "git version 2.26.2.windows.1".
Of course it's possible it's just the
|
By
Rebecca Cran
·
#344
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
I think your perl installation and your git installation may come from
different sources, and the perl install may not satisfy the git
install's dependencies.
In GNU/Linux distribution lingo, I'd
I think your perl installation and your git installation may come from
different sources, and the perl install may not satisfy the git
install's dependencies.
In GNU/Linux distribution lingo, I'd
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#343
·
|
|
Re: PKCS7 Authenticated Variable Enrollment
I am sorry that I have not the use case, and I plan to investigating it after August.
I am sorry that I have not the use case, and I plan to investigating it after August.
|
By
Guomin Jiang
·
#342
·
|
|
Re: PKCS7 Authenticated Variable Enrollment
Hi Goumin,
I had discussion internally, and I got hold off tools from: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/efitools.git.
It is generating the correct format as per
Hi Goumin,
I had discussion internally, and I got hold off tools from: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/efitools.git.
It is generating the correct format as per
|
By
Wadhawan, Divneil R
·
#341
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
This will probably be down to the [send-email] section of git config, do you have smtpEncryption enabled by any chance?
You could also try updating the required package:
perl -MCPAN -e 'install
This will probably be down to the [send-email] section of git config, do you have smtpEncryption enabled by any chance?
You could also try updating the required package:
perl -MCPAN -e 'install
|
By
Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
·
#340
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
So, today I followed the Wiki (that I had never seen) and now I’m staring down the barrel of this fellow…
[cid:image002.png@...]
[Not using SSL_VERIFY_PEER due to out-of-date
So, today I followed the Wiki (that I had never seen) and now I’m staring down the barrel of this fellow…
[cid:image002.png@...]
[Not using SSL_VERIFY_PEER due to out-of-date
|
By
Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
·
#339
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
Samer,
Have you had a chance to review Mike’s PR process? Any thoughts as comparison?
- Bret
________________________________
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 7:39:55 AM
To: rfc@edk2.groups.io
Samer,
Have you had a chance to review Mike’s PR process? Any thoughts as comparison?
- Bret
________________________________
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 7:39:55 AM
To: rfc@edk2.groups.io
|
By
Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
·
#338
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] GitHub Pull Request based Code Review Process
I actually agree with you, when we migrated from reviewboard to github pull requests, I was sorely disappointed with the PR functionality and ergonomics.
Tomas Pilar
I actually agree with you, when we migrated from reviewboard to github pull requests, I was sorely disappointed with the PR functionality and ergonomics.
Tomas Pilar
|
By
Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
·
#337
·
|