|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Rafael,
I made a little progress this weekend watching American Football on TV, and I had some time on an airplane today to add some comments.
I wrote a simple C command line program that does
Rafael,
I made a little progress this weekend watching American Football on TV, and I had some time on an airplane today to add some comments.
I wrote a simple C command line program that does
|
By
Andrew Fish <afish@...>
·
#181
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Hi Andrew
As you have mentioned:
" I might find some time to try to get the EmulatorPkg mocking working."
Answer: This would be amazing! Thanks for trying to help!
The plan is to try to get some
Hi Andrew
As you have mentioned:
" I might find some time to try to get the EmulatorPkg mocking working."
Answer: This would be amazing! Thanks for trying to help!
The plan is to try to get some
|
By
Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...>
·
#180
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address
below
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#179
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address
"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@...> wrote:
we can try to resurrect and put over it some kind of protocol
to describe which CPUs to where hotplugged.
or we could put a parameter into SMI status
"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@...> wrote:
we can try to resurrect and put over it some kind of protocol
to describe which CPUs to where hotplugged.
or we could put a parameter into SMI status
|
By
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...>
·
#178
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address
Hi Igor,
Considering the plan at [1], the two patch sets [2] [3] should cover
step (01); at least as proof of concept.
[1] [edk2-devel] CPU hotplug using SMM with QEMU+OVMF
Hi Igor,
Considering the plan at [1], the two patch sets [2] [3] should cover
step (01); at least as proof of concept.
[1] [edk2-devel] CPU hotplug using SMM with QEMU+OVMF
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#177
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Rafael,
Generally how it works for a PCI device is it gets its Start() function called to bind to the device. So the EFI_AUDIO_OUTPUT_PROTOCOL and EFI_AUDIO_CODEC_PROTOCOL protocols would likely get
Rafael,
Generally how it works for a PCI device is it gets its Start() function called to bind to the device. So the EFI_AUDIO_OUTPUT_PROTOCOL and EFI_AUDIO_CODEC_PROTOCOL protocols would likely get
|
By
Andrew Fish <afish@...>
·
#176
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
I'd like to point out that blind people do not just use speed
alterations to PCM data to achive such incredibly fast speeds; speed
alterations also come from the fact that the speech synthesizer
I'd like to point out that blind people do not just use speed
alterations to PCM data to achive such incredibly fast speeds; speed
alterations also come from the fact that the speech synthesizer
|
By
Ethin Probst
·
#175
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Hi everyone.
About Ethin's question:
synthesizer protocol. Perhaps we could extend this to the setup utility too
(as well as all other things displayed on the screen)?
Answer: This is the target from
Hi everyone.
About Ethin's question:
synthesizer protocol. Perhaps we could extend this to the setup utility too
(as well as all other things displayed on the screen)?
Answer: This is the target from
|
By
Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...>
·
#174
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Rafael,
What member functions to you think that EFI_AUDIO_OUTPUT_PROTOCOL should contain?
I'm thinking if we had an EFI_TEXT_TO_SPEECH_PROTOCOL that driver could produce a PCM/Wave buffer, it could
Rafael,
What member functions to you think that EFI_AUDIO_OUTPUT_PROTOCOL should contain?
I'm thinking if we had an EFI_TEXT_TO_SPEECH_PROTOCOL that driver could produce a PCM/Wave buffer, it could
|
By
Andrew Fish <afish@...>
·
#173
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Embedding a speech synthesizer would make things unified across all
OSes. You wouldn't need to worry about self-voicing; the speech
synthesizer would do that for you.
As for the boot manager, yes,
Embedding a speech synthesizer would make things unified across all
OSes. You wouldn't need to worry about self-voicing; the speech
synthesizer would do that for you.
As for the boot manager, yes,
|
By
Ethin Probst
·
#172
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Hi Andrew.
As you have mentioned:
it writes the NVRAM variables that point to OS loader on the EFI System
partition. Note the OS installer is the software that copied OS loader to
the EFI System
Hi Andrew.
As you have mentioned:
it writes the NVRAM variables that point to OS loader on the EFI System
partition. Note the OS installer is the software that copied OS loader to
the EFI System
|
By
Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...>
·
#171
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Answer: The EFI Firmware has some default boot options, but when an OS installs it writes the NVRAM variables that point to OS loader on the EFI System partition. Note the OS installer is the
Answer: The EFI Firmware has some default boot options, but when an OS installs it writes the NVRAM variables that point to OS loader on the EFI System partition. Note the OS installer is the
|
By
Andrew Fish <afish@...>
·
#170
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Hi Ethin.
don't know how long ago it expired but it definitely has expired, so
you don't need to worry about IP (I don't think).) An OS setup utility
would be nice if it weren't for the fact that it
Hi Ethin.
don't know how long ago it expired but it definitely has expired, so
you don't need to worry about IP (I don't think).) An OS setup utility
would be nice if it weren't for the fact that it
|
By
Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...>
·
#169
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
The patent for MP3 expired a year or so ago, if memory serves. (I
don't know how long ago it expired but it definitely has expired, so
you don't need to worry about IP (I don't think).) An OS setup
The patent for MP3 expired a year or so ago, if memory serves. (I
don't know how long ago it expired but it definitely has expired, so
you don't need to worry about IP (I don't think).) An OS setup
|
By
Ethin Probst
·
#168
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Rafael,
I'm not exactly the ARM expert, but what we have seen is as long as en EFI PCI driver follows the EFI rules for DMA it should work just fine on all CPU architectures. The historical problem
Rafael,
I'm not exactly the ARM expert, but what we have seen is as long as en EFI PCI driver follows the EFI rules for DMA it should work just fine on all CPU architectures. The historical problem
|
By
Andrew Fish <afish@...>
·
#167
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address
Another possibility would be to alias the 0xA0000..0xBFFFF SMRAM to
0x30000..0x4FFFF (only when in SMM).
I'm not super enthusiastic about adding this kind of QEMU-only feature.
The alternative would
Another possibility would be to alias the 0xA0000..0xBFFFF SMRAM to
0x30000..0x4FFFF (only when in SMM).
I'm not super enthusiastic about adding this kind of QEMU-only feature.
The alternative would
|
By
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...>
·
#166
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1
Mike:
By
Liming Gao
·
#165
·
|
|
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate
Hi Everyone
Answering Ethin:
Answer: Neither do I. Lets wait some ARM expert to give some opinion :)
Answering Andrew
supported? I assume the CODEC implies the audio file formats that can
Hi Everyone
Answering Ethin:
Answer: Neither do I. Lets wait some ARM expert to give some opinion :)
Answering Andrew
supported? I assume the CODEC implies the audio file formats that can
|
By
Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...>
·
#164
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address
"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@...> wrote:
Laszlo, thanks for trying it out.
It's nice to hear that approach is somewhat usable.
Hopefully we won't have to invent 'paused' cpu mode.
Pls CC me on your
"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@...> wrote:
Laszlo, thanks for trying it out.
It's nice to hear that approach is somewhat usable.
Hopefully we won't have to invent 'paused' cpu mode.
Pls CC me on your
|
By
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...>
·
#163
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address
I've got good results. For this (1/2) QEMU patch:
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
I tested the following scenarios. In every case, I verified the OVMF
log, and also the "info mtree"
I've got good results. For this (1/2) QEMU patch:
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
I tested the following scenarios. In every case, I verified the OVMF
log, and also the "info mtree"
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#162
·
|