Date   
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Andrew Fish <afish@...> · #173 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Ethin Probst · #172 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...> · #171 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Andrew Fish <afish@...> · #170 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...> · #169 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Ethin Probst · #168 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Andrew Fish <afish@...> · #167 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address By Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...> · #166 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1 By Liming Gao · #165 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...> · #164 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address By Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...> · #163 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address By Laszlo Ersek · #162 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1 By Michael D Kinney · #161 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Andrew Fish <afish@...> · #160 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Ethin Probst · #159 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...> · #158 ·
Re: UEFI accessibility mandate By Rafael Machado <rafaelrodrigues.machado@...> · #157 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] EDK II Continuous Integration Phase 1 By Sean · #156 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address By Laszlo Ersek · #155 ·
Re: [edk2-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address By Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...> · #154 ·
581 - 600 of 753