On 06/24/2021 8:36 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 00:24 +0000, Min Xu wrote:
On 06/22/2021 9:39 PM, Laszlo wrote:The mailing list still won't give me that file, can you update it in the bugzilla:
I should clarify: the relevant part of my preference is not thatThanks much for the comments and we don't want to make OvmfPkgX64.dsc
contain the *complete* TDVF feature set. The relevant part (for me)
is that "OvmfPkgX64.dsc" *not* be over-complicated for the sake of
TDX, even considering only the "basic" TDVF feature set. It's fine
to implement TDX in two stages ("basic" and "complete"); my point is
that even "basic"
should not over-
We have updated the design slides to V0.95 and Slides 6-15 are
discussing the Config-A and Config-B.
Your comment is always welcome!
As well, please?
Sure. TDVF Design Review v0.95 is uploaded tohttps://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429