On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 00:24 +0000, Min Xu wrote:
On 06/22/2021 9:39 PM, Laszlo wrote:
I should clarify: the relevant part of my preference is not thatThanks much for the comments and we don't want to make OvmfPkgX64.dsc
contain the *complete* TDVF feature set. The relevant part (for me)
"OvmfPkgX64.dsc" *not* be over-complicated for the sake of TDX,
considering only the "basic" TDVF feature set. It's fine to
implement TDX in two
stages ("basic" and "complete"); my point is that even "basic"
should not over-
We have updated the design slides to V0.95 and Slides 6-15 are
Config-A and Config-B.
Your comment is always welcome!
The mailing list still won't give me that file, can you update it in
As well, please?