Re: [RFC] Request for new git repository for EdkRepo
|
Bjorge, Erik C
I am fine with a new repo. This also supports a good workflow to get a tool that then lets you pull full platforms. In theory you would only ever really need to clone a single repo manually (assuming reasonable manifest support).
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Are you also looking at creating a separate manifest repo as well or just creating a manifest branch in the new EdkRepo repository? Thanks, -Erik -----Original Message-----
From: Desimone, Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desimone@...> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 2:56 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io; rfc@edk2.groups.io Cc: Desimone, Ashley E <ashley.e.desimone@...>; Bjorge, Erik C <erik.c.bjorge@...> Subject: [RFC] Request for new git repository for EdkRepo Hi Everyone, Given that EdkRepo has existed in the project for over a year now (in edk2-staging) I think it is time to get out of staging. I have considered multiple possible landing zones: 1. edk2 2. edk2-pytool-library 3. A new repository Edk2 does not seem like a good location as EdkRepo isn't strictly necessary to build EDK II, and I think all of us would prefer that edk2 not become a dumping ground. I have talked with the other maintainers of edk2-pytool-library and they would prefer that EdkRepo not enter that repository because EdkRepo does not have a robust set of unit tests yet and they don't want their test coverage metrics to decline. Therefore, the best choice seems to be a new repository. As always if anyone has comments they are welcome! Thanks, Nate |
|
|