Both are merged. https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2981

Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>

Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>

Thanks for the response. 1) Why we need "enable UEFI variable write before permanent memory is available"? 2) If the implementation is not ready, I do have concern to add it so early in EDKII. If I do

Hi I am curious why we need this interface. Why we need write variable capability in PEI phase? Where is the implementation of this? I prefer to see an implementation submitted together with header fi

OK. I will revert this at first. Let's figure out a right solution. Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>

I remember a wait-for-SIPI CPU cannot response to SMI. We do want to let AP response SMI to perform some action, because some SMM code will rely on all APs in SMM. Thank you Yao Jiewen

Merged https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2956

Hey Gerd CI failed - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2954 Have you run the CI before you submit the patch? Thank you Yao Jiewen

OK. Let's get it work at first. Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>

Hello As far as I know the TemporaryRamMigration() is an optional PPI according to PI spec, I forget why we add it in the beginning. To reduce the maintenance effort, can we try to remove it? As such

The previous patch created a new instance SecTpmMeasurementLibTdx, which is not a best idea. If we can use the existing instance, there is no need to create a new one. Just create a new instance. Than

Merged https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2951

Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>

Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>

Hi I don't remember it is accepted in UEFI protocol. As such, we cannot use EFI_ prefix, and we cannot put it to MdePkg. I recommend we use EDKII_ prefix, and move it to MdeModulePkg as first step. Th

Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>

Merged https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2943

Merged https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2942

Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>