Hi Liming, Thanks for the help! Regards, Kun

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 Current MM communicate routine from ArmPkg would conduct few checks prior to proceeding with SMC calls. However, the inspection step is differe

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 Current MM communicate routine from ArmPkg would conduct few checks prior to proceeding with SMC calls. However, the inspection step is differe

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 Current MM communicate routine from ArmPkg would conduct few checks prior to proceeding with SMC calls. However, the inspection step is differe

Current MM communicate2 function from ArmPkg described input arguments `CommBufferPhysical`, `CommBufferVirtual` and `CommSize` as input only, which mismatches with the "input and output type" as in P

Current MM communicate2 function definition described input arguments `CommBufferPhysical`, `CommBufferVirtual` and `CommSize` as input only, which mismatches with the "input and output type" as in PI

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3709 In EDKII implementation of variable policy, the DXE runtime agent would communicate to MM to disable, register or query policies. However, thes

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3709 REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 This patch series is a follow up of previous submission: https://edk2.groups.io/g/deve

Hi Mike, Sorry if the questions are being naive. My interpretation for the code-first process below is that we need to first obtain "Reviewed-By" tags for all patches in this branch on this mailing li

I thought the reply on website will retain the original CC list. But I was wrong about that. Thanks for the reminder, Rebecca. Regards, Kun

Hi Mike, Do you have further feedback regarding this updated change? If not, could you please shed some light on how to proceed on this code first PI spec change request? Any help is appreciated. Rega

Hi ArmPkg maintainers, It has been almost a month since this v2 patch series has been sent out for review. Could you please take a look and provide feedback? Thanks in advance. Regards, Kun

Hi MdeModulePkg and ArmPkg maintainers, It has been another week since this v2 patch series has been sent out for review. Could you please take a look and provide feedback? Any input is appreciated. R

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3798 UnitTestFrameworkPkg.dec contains cmockery folder from cmocka submodule. However, the term "cmockery" is unrecognized by cspell tool. This chan

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3798 UnitTestFrameworkPkg.dec contains cmockery folder from cmocka submodule. However, the term "cmockery" is unrecognized by cspell tool. This chan

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 This change introduces a new error code definitions under Host Software class. The new error code definition will cover system reboot events un

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 This change includes specification update markdown file that describes the proposed PI Specification v1.7 Errata A in detail and potential impa

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 This patch series is a rebase of previous submission: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/85302 In current Status Codes definitions of PI sp

Hi Mike, Thanks for the suggestion. I am good with the new name and will send out the updated branch shortly. Regards, Kun

Hi Mike, Thanks for the input. Is it better to rename "EFI_SW_EC_MEMORY_TYPE_INFORMATION_CHANGE" as "EFI_SW_EC_INCONSISTENT_MEM_MAP"? This name should be more generic yet still describing what OSes ma