I updated release planning page for you. Thank you Yao Jiewen

Yes, justification in bugzilla and README, please. I suggestion you send a different email to ask the different topic - not distract people.

If you want to support PVH-only, that means you *defeature* the CloudHv in *edk2-stable202202* tag according to https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Planning. I hope th

I think both are correct. The dump info is from a *client* machine in old generation - kabylake. 39 bits physical is good enough. GPAW in TD is enforced by TDX-module. Please refer to https://www.inte

HI Sebastien Here is some feedback. 1) Since this seems a new feature, would you please file a Bugzilla https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/ ? 2) Please also include this new feature in release plan - http

But I don’t understand why we need sha3.h and xkcp.h at all.

Merged https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2525 https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/c28e376edc46e6db6e4a551c94b6ac90df0d8d6e

Yes. Will do it soon.

+ Liming Since it is an issue https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3835 in RC1, I assume we need merge it soon. Please double confirm. Thank you Yao, Jiewen

Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>

Thanks for the update. Feedback below: 1) How block size is determined for below API? BOOLEAN EFIAPI ParallelHash256HashAll ( IN CONST VOID *Input, IN UINTN InputByteLen, OUT VOID *Output, IN UINTN Ou

Merged https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2502

Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>

Hi Then I don’t understand why we need this feature. Please submit a bugzilla to describe the problem statement. (Not the solution) Also please provide the size difference in pei and smm before and af

thank you since you are talking about size optimization, would you please share the result? thank you! Yao, Jiewen

Thank you! Good result. Comment below:

Merged: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2411

Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>

Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>