|
[PATCH 1/3] MdePkg: promote CompilerIntrinsicsLib from ArmPkg to MdePkg
First step in creating a single, common compiler intrinsics library for
everybody who needs it. Move the ArmPkg library to MdePkg, update all
references. No code changes.
Signed-off-by: Gerd
First step in creating a single, common compiler intrinsics library for
everybody who needs it. Move the ArmPkg library to MdePkg, update all
references. No code changes.
Signed-off-by: Gerd
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#87128
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 2/2] EmulatorPkg/EmuGopDxe: Set ModeInfo after Open successfully
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#87127
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] OvmfPkg: Generate CloudHv as a PVH ELF binary
I think you can:
(1) drop FD.CLOUDHV_VARS
(2) drop FD.CLOUDHV_CODE
(3) make VARS_SIZE smaller (just enough for the pvh header),
(4) make FVMAIN_SIZE larger (so the total size remains the
I think you can:
(1) drop FD.CLOUDHV_VARS
(2) drop FD.CLOUDHV_CODE
(3) make VARS_SIZE smaller (just enough for the pvh header),
(4) make FVMAIN_SIZE larger (so the total size remains the
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#87126
·
|
|
Re: RFC: UefiCpuPkg for all processor archs
Abner,
UefiCpuPkg\SecCore\SecCoreNative.inf is a module that might not depend on X86. It assumes the UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector inits the CPU well.
UefiCpuPKg/BaseUefiCpuLib
1. Rename
Abner,
UefiCpuPkg\SecCore\SecCoreNative.inf is a module that might not depend on X86. It assumes the UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector inits the CPU well.
UefiCpuPKg/BaseUefiCpuLib
1. Rename
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#87125
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] BlSupportSmm: fix definition of SetSmrr()
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#87124
·
|
|
Re: [`edk2-devel][PATCH] Maintainers.txt: Add new reviewer for UefiPayloadPkg
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#87123
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH V7 00/37] Enable Intel TDX in OvmfPkg (Config-A)
Just to clarify below:
#define EFI_RESOURCE_MEMORY_UNACCEPTED 0x00000007
This is proposed in
Just to clarify below:
#define EFI_RESOURCE_MEMORY_UNACCEPTED 0x00000007
This is proposed in
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#87122
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] UefiPayloadPkg: Add build option for Above 4G Memory
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#87121
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH V7 00/37] Enable Intel TDX in OvmfPkg (Config-A)
Sure. It will be updated in the next version.
EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_ENCRYPTED is deprecated. According to [TDVF] Table 7-1 private memory is distinguished with Unaccepted Memory by ResourceType
Sure. It will be updated in the next version.
EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_ENCRYPTED is deprecated. According to [TDVF] Table 7-1 private memory is distinguished with Unaccepted Memory by ResourceType
|
By
Min Xu
·
#87120
·
|
|
Event: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO - 03/01/2022
#cal-reminder
Reminder: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO
When:
03/01/2022
6:30pm to 7:30pm
(UTC-08:00) America/Los
Reminder: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO
When:
03/01/2022
6:30pm to 7:30pm
(UTC-08:00) America/Los
|
By
devel@edk2.groups.io Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#87119
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH V7 00/37] Enable Intel TDX in OvmfPkg (Config-A)
Min:
I have two comments in MdePkg. The changes in MdeModulePkg are good to me.
1. Seemly, new APIs (TdCall, TdVmCall, TdIsEnabled) in BaseLib are X86 specific. How about define them in #if defined
Min:
I have two comments in MdePkg. The changes in MdeModulePkg are good to me.
1. Seemly, new APIs (TdCall, TdVmCall, TdIsEnabled) in BaseLib are X86 specific. How about define them in #if defined
|
By
gaoliming
·
#87118
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel][PATCH] edk2/MdeModulePkg/Debuglib: Add Standalone MM support
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>
|
By
gaoliming
·
#87117
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] edk2/MdeModulePkg/Debuglib: Add Standalone MM support
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@...>
Regards,
Jian
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@...>
Regards,
Jian
|
By
Wang, Jian J
·
#87116
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] BaseTools/GenFw: Enhance GenFw to support PRM GCC build
Lisa:
Please add BZ link for this patch.
And, if PRM option currently only supports DXE RUNTIME driver and X64
arch,
does GenFw report error message if PRM option is specified for other
Lisa:
Please add BZ link for this patch.
And, if PRM option currently only supports DXE RUNTIME driver and X64
arch,
does GenFw report error message if PRM option is specified for other
|
By
gaoliming
·
#87115
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] BaseTools: Remove UserManuals files.
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao
By
gaoliming
·
#87114
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Reduce the ASSERT patch to save the binary size
Guomin:
I add my comments.
Why do you think the compiler option is not good option? If the compiler supports such option,
it will reduce the customization in Edk2 BaseTools.
This solution
Guomin:
I add my comments.
Why do you think the compiler option is not good option? If the compiler supports such option,
it will reduce the customization in Edk2 BaseTools.
This solution
|
By
gaoliming
·
#87113
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] UefiPayloadPkg: Make Boot Manager Key configurable
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#87112
·
|
|
RFC: UefiCpuPkg for all processor archs
Hi Mike and Ray,
I just got a chance to back on this topic and below are few questions regarding the UefiCpuPkg for all processor archs.
I change the subject and loop Chao Li from Loongsoon who is
Hi Mike and Ray,
I just got a chance to back on this topic and below are few questions regarding the UefiCpuPkg for all processor archs.
I change the subject and loop Chao Li from Loongsoon who is
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#87111
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/2] BaseTools/Conf: Reduce the ASSERT patch to save the binary size
Hi Bob,
Have and the review link to the Bugzilla.
Thanks
Hi Bob,
Have and the review link to the Bugzilla.
Thanks
|
By
Guomin Jiang
·
#87110
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-non-osi][PATCH v2] Drivers/Realtek: Including Realtek driver to enable network support
Thanks for the clarification.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...>
Pushed as c1075e9ddd64..0320db977fb2
Thanks for the clarification.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...>
Pushed as c1075e9ddd64..0320db977fb2
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#87109
·
|