|
[PATCH v3 1/6] Platform/ARM/SgiPkg: sync with edk2 StandaloneMmCpu path change
Synchronize with edk2 package where StandaloneMmCpu component has moved
from StandaloneMmPkg/Drivers/StandaloneMmCpu/AArch64/StandaloneMmCpu.inf
to
Synchronize with edk2 package where StandaloneMmCpu component has moved
from StandaloneMmPkg/Drivers/StandaloneMmCpu/AArch64/StandaloneMmCpu.inf
to
|
By
Etienne Carriere
·
#79038
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 0/6] Arm 32bit support in PlatformStandaloneMmRpmb
This series brings support for building PlatformStandaloneMmRpmb for
32bit Arm architectures. This series is based on series tracked through
[1] in edk2 that allows to build StandaloneMm package for
This series brings support for building PlatformStandaloneMmRpmb for
32bit Arm architectures. This series is based on series tracked through
[1] in edk2 that allows to build StandaloneMm package for
|
By
Etienne Carriere
·
#79037
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-platforms][PATCH v1 1/1] IntelSiliconPkg/PeiSmmAccessLib: Remove S3 requirement
Installation is a platform decision. The buried dependency on boot mode in this particular function is just a roadblock platforms have to work around. The role of this API is to install the
Installation is a platform decision. The buried dependency on boot mode in this particular function is just a roadblock platforms have to work around. The role of this API is to install the
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#79036
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-platforms][PATCH v1 1/1] IntelSiliconPkg: Add BaseSmmAccessLibNull
There is not a SmmAccess PEIM in IntelSiliconPkg.
There is a SmmAccessDxe
There is not a SmmAccess PEIM in IntelSiliconPkg.
There is a SmmAccessDxe
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#79035
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] ArmPkg: Enable boot discovery policy for ARM package.
Hi Ard,
Yeah, this is a good point. Greg and I offline discussed this as well.
If we don't miss anything, only applying this patch without platform changes should be fine. There should be no behavior
Hi Ard,
Yeah, this is a good point. Greg and I offline discussed this as well.
If we don't miss anything, only applying this patch without platform changes should be fine. There should be no behavior
|
By
Sunny Wang
·
#79034
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-platforms PATCH 2/7] Marvell: Armada7k8k/OcteonTx: Add missing _STA methods in ACPI tables
By
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
·
#79033
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-platforms PATCH 2/7] Marvell: Armada7k8k/OcteonTx: Add missing _STA methods in ACPI tables
<samer.el-haj-mahmoud@...> wrote:
OK, I stand corrected again :-)
Marcin,
I won't object further to these additions -please respin the patch on
top of current edk2-platform and I will apply it
<samer.el-haj-mahmoud@...> wrote:
OK, I stand corrected again :-)
Marcin,
I won't object further to these additions -please respin the patch on
top of current edk2-platform and I will apply it
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#79032
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-platforms PATCH 2/7] Marvell: Armada7k8k/OcteonTx: Add missing _STA methods in ACPI tables
Apologies for the tardiness in replying to this. Please see my comments below.
Apologies for the tardiness in replying to this. Please see my comments below.
|
By
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
·
#79031
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/1] OvmfPkg PlatformBootManagerLib: Move TryRunningQemuKernel()
There's no definition of a disk device in here.
Which looks like why this failed.
Where's the vmm supposed to get /dev/sda from? It sort of seems like
the CD rom boot script thinks it was mounted
There's no definition of a disk device in here.
Which looks like why this failed.
Where's the vmm supposed to get /dev/sda from? It sort of seems like
the CD rom boot script thinks it was mounted
|
By
James Bottomley
·
#79030
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe: Add support for SEV live migration.
Makes sense.
Thanks,
Tom
By
Lendacky, Thomas
·
#79029
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] OvmfPkg/BaseMemEncryptLib: Detect SEV live migration feature.
Ah, thanks. I just saw the comment above get_out_of_range_cpuid_entry() in
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c where HyperV would get the 0x40000000-0x400000ff
range and KVM would then get the 0x40000100-0x400001ff
Ah, thanks. I just saw the comment above get_out_of_range_cpuid_entry() in
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c where HyperV would get the 0x40000000-0x400000ff
range and KVM would then get the 0x40000100-0x400001ff
|
By
Lendacky, Thomas
·
#79028
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/1] OvmfPkg PlatformBootManagerLib: Move TryRunningQemuKernel()
Thanks for your interest Gerd,
I added "-serial mon:stdio" to the qemu invocation and "console=ttyS0"
to the -append line to capture all boot output for both good and bad
cases and saved the results
Thanks for your interest Gerd,
I added "-serial mon:stdio" to the qemu invocation and "console=ttyS0"
to the -append line to capture all boot output for both good and bad
cases and saved the results
|
By
Christoph Willing
·
#79027
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe: Add support for SEV live migration.
Hello Tom,
I don't think we should do an assert here and abort booting, failure
here will simply disable live migration support but i don't think that
it is such a fatal error that we should abort
Hello Tom,
I don't think we should do an assert here and abort booting, failure
here will simply disable live migration support but i don't think that
it is such a fatal error that we should abort
|
By
Ashish Kalra
·
#79026
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] MdePkg/BaseLib: Fix unaligned API prototypes
They do contain UB, inherently from the combination of their prototype and their usage.
Please refer to the new BZ added for V2: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3542
I could only
They do contain UB, inherently from the combination of their prototype and their usage.
Please refer to the new BZ added for V2: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3542
I could only
|
By
Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@...>
·
#79025
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] UefiCpuPkg/BaseUefiCpuLib: Use toolchain-specific rodata section name
The latter part is true only for Xcode-based toolchains, as far as I am aware now, and this is in fact the way it works right now.
You are correct, but the NASM section name semantically translates
The latter part is true only for Xcode-based toolchains, as far as I am aware now, and this is in fact the way it works right now.
You are correct, but the NASM section name semantically translates
|
By
Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@...>
·
#79024
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] BaseTools: Define the read-only data section name per toolchain
Yes, and ".rodata" is almost a synonym for "__DATA,__const", with a small exception [1]. Maybe it'd be clearer if the macro was renamed to "NASM_RODATA_SECTION_NAME", to indicate this is not just a
Yes, and ".rodata" is almost a synonym for "__DATA,__const", with a small exception [1]. Maybe it'd be clearer if the macro was renamed to "NASM_RODATA_SECTION_NAME", to indicate this is not just a
|
By
Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@...>
·
#79023
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/3] BaseTools: fix some python DeprecationWarnings
Hi Robinson,
When we doing the internal test, the issue is found that py27 is blocked by this patch.
You can reproduce the error with below steps:
For Linux:
[Error Reproduce steps]
$ export
Hi Robinson,
When we doing the internal test, the issue is found that py27 is blocked by this patch.
You can reproduce the error with below steps:
For Linux:
[Error Reproduce steps]
$ export
|
By
Yuwei Chen
·
#79022
·
|
|
[edk2-platforms:PATCH V6] Platform/Intel: Correct CPU APIC IDs
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3365
BIOS cannot find correct AcpiProcId in mApicIdMap because of
there is no suitable map, that causes ACPI_BIOS_ERROR.
Remove mApicIdMap for
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3365
BIOS cannot find correct AcpiProcId in mApicIdMap because of
there is no suitable map, that causes ACPI_BIOS_ERROR.
Remove mApicIdMap for
|
By
JackX Lin
·
#79021
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] SecurityPkg: Debug code to audit BIOS TPM extend operations.
Hi Jiewen,
The intention of such API would be to ease debugging and auditing PCR attestation along the boot; it has been a common task while debugging several issues and TPM configurations.
a)
Hi Jiewen,
The intention of such API would be to ease debugging and auditing PCR attestation along the boot; it has been a common task while debugging several issues and TPM configurations.
a)
|
By
Rodrigo Gonzalez del Cueto
·
#79020
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] Reallocate TPM Active PCRs based on platform support.
Hi Jiewen,
Indeed, this bug has existed for a long time in this code. What recently changed are the TPM configurations we are testing and exposed the issue; this can be reproduced when theBIOS
Hi Jiewen,
Indeed, this bug has existed for a long time in this code. What recently changed are the TPM configurations we are testing and exposed the issue; this can be reproduced when theBIOS
|
By
Rodrigo Gonzalez del Cueto
·
#79019
·
|