|
[PATCH v4 05/20] OvmfPkg/Microvm: no tpm
Microvm has no TPM support.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3599
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...>
Acked-by:
Microvm has no TPM support.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3599
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...>
Acked-by:
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#80789
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 07/20] OvmfPkg/Microvm: no csm
Guests depending on BIOS will probably not work that well with microvm
due to legacy hardware being not available.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3599
Signed-off-by: Gerd
Guests depending on BIOS will probably not work that well with microvm
due to legacy hardware being not available.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3599
Signed-off-by: Gerd
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#80788
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 06/20] OvmfPkg/Microvm: no sev
Microvm has no SEV support.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3599
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>
---
Microvm has no SEV support.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3599
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>
---
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#80787
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 04/20] OvmfPkg/Microvm: no secure boot
Without SMM secure boot isn't actually secure, so drop it too.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3599
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao
Without SMM secure boot isn't actually secure, so drop it too.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3599
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#80786
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 03/20] OvmfPkg/Microvm: no smm
Microvm has no SMM support.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3599
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>
---
Microvm has no SMM support.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3599
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@...>
---
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#80785
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 01/20] OvmfPkg/Microvm: copy OvmfPkgX64 files as-is
Create Microvm subdirectory. Copy OvmfPkgX64 .dsc and .fdf files
unmodified as starting point for MicrovmX64.
Changes come as separate patches, to simplify patch review and rebases.
Ref:
Create Microvm subdirectory. Copy OvmfPkgX64 .dsc and .fdf files
unmodified as starting point for MicrovmX64.
Changes come as separate patches, to simplify patch review and rebases.
Ref:
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#80784
·
|
|
[PATCH v4 02/20] OvmfPkg/Microvm: rename output files, fix includes
Rename the firmware volume files (s/OVMF/MICROVM/).
Fix includes so they work with microvm config being in a subdirectory.
With this patch applied the build works.
Ref:
Rename the firmware volume files (s/OVMF/MICROVM/).
Fix includes so they work with microvm config being in a subdirectory.
With this patch applied the build works.
Ref:
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#80783
·
|
|
[PATCH v7] UefiCpuPkg: VTF0 Linear-Address Translation to a 1-GByte Page till 512GB
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3473
X64 Reset Vector Code can access the memory range till 4GB using the
Linear-Address Translation to a 2-MByte Page, when user wants to use
more
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3473
X64 Reset Vector Code can access the memory range till 4GB using the
Linear-Address Translation to a 2-MByte Page, when user wants to use
more
|
By
Ashraf Ali S
·
#80782
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 04/28] AmperePlatformPkg: Add FailSafe and WDT support
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif@...>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif@...>
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#80781
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v7 17/31] OvmfPkg/SecMain: pre-validate the memory used for decompressing Fv
I was not sure how TDX is approaching the validation in the SEC phase;
i.e, will it go with validating the entire guest RAM at once or validate
the selective portion then push everything to PEI or DXE
I was not sure how TDX is approaching the validation in the SEC phase;
i.e, will it go with validating the entire guest RAM at once or validate
the selective portion then push everything to PEI or DXE
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#80780
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v7 11/31] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: register GHCB gpa for the SEV-SNP guest
The SEC begins with a fixed GHCB page; During the PEI phase, we allocate
and switch to new per-CPU GHCB page and thus need to registration for
the new GHCB. Please see the
The SEC begins with a fixed GHCB page; During the PEI phase, we allocate
and switch to new per-CPU GHCB page and thus need to registration for
the new GHCB. Please see the
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#80779
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v7 09/31] OvmfPkg/SecMain: register GHCB gpa for the SEV-SNP guest
Sure, I will add comment.
thanks
Sure, I will add comment.
thanks
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#80778
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v7 06/31] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: pre-validate the data pages used in SEC phase
Yep, looking at the current TDX patches we see that GHCB is used for the
mailbox, to make integration easy its good idea that we define
SEV_SECTION_TYPE_SEC_MEM and use it for those GHCB memory
Yep, looking at the current TDX patches we see that GHCB is used for the
mailbox, to make integration easy its good idea that we define
SEV_SECTION_TYPE_SEC_MEM and use it for those GHCB memory
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#80777
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 01/28] Ampere: Initial support for Ampere Altra processor and Mt. Jade platform
Err, actually, no.
You cannot give sign-off for Vu, but you need to sign off for
yourself. So we will need a v4.
If this patch in that set contains your Signed-off-by, and no-one
elses, that can
Err, actually, no.
You cannot give sign-off for Vu, but you need to sign off for
yourself. So we will need a v4.
If this patch in that set contains your Signed-off-by, and no-one
elses, that can
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#80776
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v7 05/31] OvmfPkg: reserve CPUID page
Noted.
thanks
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#80775
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/1] ArmPkg/ProcessorSubClassDxe: Fix the format of ProcessorId
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@...>
--
Rebecca Cran
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@...>
--
Rebecca Cran
|
By
Rebecca Cran <rebecca@...>
·
#80774
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 01/28] Ampere: Initial support for Ampere Altra processor and Mt. Jade platform
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif@...>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif@...>
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#80773
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] Add new Ampere Mt. Jade platform
Hi Nhi,
+ the added common functions in EmbeddedPkg AcpiLib.
This feedback is a bit oversimplified.
There is an entirely new Ac01PcieLib component - which I could quickly
tell because the NOOPT
Hi Nhi,
+ the added common functions in EmbeddedPkg AcpiLib.
This feedback is a bit oversimplified.
There is an entirely new Ac01PcieLib component - which I could quickly
tell because the NOOPT
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#80772
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v6] UefiCpuPkg: VTF0 Linear-Address Translation to a 1-GByte Page till 512GB
Hi,
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1979 detected errors.
Can you check and update a new patch to fix?
Thanks,
Ray
Hi,
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1979 detected errors.
Can you check and update a new patch to fix?
Thanks,
Ray
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#80771
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 2/2] UefiCpuPkg: Prevent from re-initializing CPU features during S3 resume
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3621
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3631
Current CPU feature initialization design:
During normal boot, CpuFeaturesPei
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3621
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3631
Current CPU feature initialization design:
During normal boot, CpuFeaturesPei
|
By
Jason Lou
·
#80770
·
|