|
Re: [PATCH 0/2] BaseTools: Switch ARM/AARCH64 CI gcc from Linaro to Arm
Ah, I see why that's a problem now. The path is constructed in BaseTools/Plugin/LinuxGcc5ToolChain/LinuxGcc5ToolChain.py:
# make GCC5_ARM_PREFIX to align with
Ah, I see why that's a problem now. The path is constructed in BaseTools/Plugin/LinuxGcc5ToolChain/LinuxGcc5ToolChain.py:
# make GCC5_ARM_PREFIX to align with
|
By
Rebecca Cran
·
#79910
·
|
|
[PATCH] CryptoPkg/BaseCryptLib: Eliminate extra buffer copy in Pkcs7Verify()
Create a read-only openSSL BIO wrapper for the existing input
buffer passed to Pkcs7Verify() instead of copying the buffer
into an empty writable BIO which causes memory allocations
within
Create a read-only openSSL BIO wrapper for the existing input
buffer passed to Pkcs7Verify() instead of copying the buffer
into an empty writable BIO which causes memory allocations
within
|
By
Bob Morgan
·
#79909
·
|
|
Re: OVMF: NV Variable Store Layout of Larger Build Targets
(+ Gerd)
<dbautista@...> wrote:
(+ Gerd)
<dbautista@...> wrote:
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#79908
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] add support for virtio-mmio 1.0
FYI this is actually a supported and recommended way of doing things:
any user can send PRs and the CI will run on them. Only maintainers
can do so and set the 'pull' label, in which case the PR will
FYI this is actually a supported and recommended way of doing things:
any user can send PRs and the CI will run on them. Only maintainers
can do so and set the 'pull' label, in which case the PR will
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#79907
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] add support for virtio-mmio 1.0
Yes, please.
Feel free to submit your own PR.
As long as you did not label - PUSH, this CI just shows the test result. It will NOT merge automatically.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
Yes, please.
Feel free to submit your own PR.
As long as you did not label - PUSH, this CI just shows the test result. It will NOT merge automatically.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#79906
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 7/7] OvmfPkg/VirtioMmioDeviceLib: enable virtio 1.0
Now with everything in place for virtio 1.0 devices we can let
VirtioMmioInit() return SUCCESS.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude
Now with everything in place for virtio 1.0 devices we can let
VirtioMmioInit() return SUCCESS.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#79905
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 5/7] OvmfPkg/VirtioMmioDeviceLib: virtio 1.0: Add default QueueNum
Use QueueNumMax as QueueNum default for drivers which do not
explicitly call VIRTIO_DEVICE_PROTOCOL->SetQueueSize().
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Philippe
Use QueueNumMax as QueueNum default for drivers which do not
explicitly call VIRTIO_DEVICE_PROTOCOL->SetQueueSize().
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Philippe
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#79904
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 6/7] OvmfPkg/VirtioMmioDeviceLib: virtio 1.0: Adapt feature bit handling
virtio 1.0 has 64 feature bits instead of 32.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@...>
---
.../VirtioMmioDeviceFunctions.c
virtio 1.0 has 64 feature bits instead of 32.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@...>
---
.../VirtioMmioDeviceFunctions.c
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#79903
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 3/7] OvmfPkg/VirtioMmioDeviceLib: virtio 1.0: Fix SetPageSize.
Nothing to do here for virtio 1.0 devices.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@...>
---
Nothing to do here for virtio 1.0 devices.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@...>
---
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#79902
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 4/7] OvmfPkg/VirtioMmioDeviceLib: virtio 1.0: Fix SetQueueAddress
Virtio 1.0 allows a more flexible virtio ring layout, so we have to set
addresses for descriptors avail flags and use flags separately. We
continue to use a ring layout compatible with virtio 0.9.5
Virtio 1.0 allows a more flexible virtio ring layout, so we have to set
addresses for descriptors avail flags and use flags separately. We
continue to use a ring layout compatible with virtio 0.9.5
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#79901
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 0/7] add support for virtio-mmio 1.0
This little series adds virtio 1.0 support for the virtio-mmio
transport. For the mmio transport the difference between 0.9.5 and 1.0
is rather small (when compared to the pci transport), it is just
This little series adds virtio 1.0 support for the virtio-mmio
transport. For the mmio transport the difference between 0.9.5 and 1.0
is rather small (when compared to the pci transport), it is just
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#79900
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 2/7] OvmfPkg/VirtioMmioDeviceLib: Add virtio 1.0 detection.
Add #defines for the Version field. Read and store the version,
log the version found as info message.
Continue to return UNSUPPORTED for now, we need some more patches
to complete virtio 1.0
Add #defines for the Version field. Read and store the version,
log the version found as info message.
Continue to return UNSUPPORTED for now, we need some more patches
to complete virtio 1.0
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#79899
·
|
|
[PATCH v5 1/7] OvmfPkg/Virtio10: Add virtio-mmio 1.0 defines
Add defines for the config space offsets for virtio 1.0 mmio transport.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@...>
---
Add defines for the config space offsets for virtio 1.0 mmio transport.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@...>
---
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#79898
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] SecurityPkg/Tcg: remove TcgMorLockSmm driver
Hi
This patch failed in CI - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1922
Please take a look and submit patch again.
Hi
This patch failed in CI - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1922
Please take a look and submit patch again.
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#79897
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] add support for virtio-mmio 1.0
Is there some way to run the CI before posting the patches?
I could probably create a dummy pull request for that and delete it when
the CI is done. That'll probably make gitlab send out a bunch
Is there some way to run the CI before posting the patches?
I could probably create a dummy pull request for that and delete it when
the CI is done. That'll probably make gitlab send out a bunch
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#79896
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/2] BaseTools: Switch ARM/AARCH64 CI gcc from Linaro to Arm
You are changing the compiler from
arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
to
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
(and likewise for aarch64) so I am not surprised you are hitting problems.
You are changing the compiler from
arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
to
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
(and likewise for aarch64) so I am not surprised you are hitting problems.
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#79895
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix OvmfXen boot failure due to s3 support state
Thanks for this series, and thanks all for the reviews.
Gary, could you please resend it with the following changes so it
applies cleanly:
- Move the bugzilla link into the signoff block, preceded by
Thanks for this series, and thanks all for the reviews.
Gary, could you please resend it with the following changes so it
applies cleanly:
- Move the bugzilla link into the signoff block, preceded by
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#79894
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] reuse the SevEsWork area
Patch is pushed - 80e67af9afcac3b860384cdb1f4613f7240e1630.. b9af5037b270c4767b275fd5d23b942c422e742f
Patch is pushed - 80e67af9afcac3b860384cdb1f4613f7240e1630.. b9af5037b270c4767b275fd5d23b942c422e742f
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#79893
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] ArmPkg/GicV3Dxe: Don't signal EOI on arbitrary interrupts
Merged as #1920
Thanks all,
Merged as #1920
Thanks all,
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#79892
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] add support for virtio-mmio 1.0
I am sorry, I mess up https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1917, please ignore that.
This pull request is re-created at https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1918.
Please take a look at 1918.
I am sorry, I mess up https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1917, please ignore that.
This pull request is re-created at https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1918.
Please take a look at 1918.
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#79891
·
|