|
Re: 回复: [PATCH v1 1/1] MdeModulePkg/XhciSched: Fix missing DEBUG arguments
Pushed via:
PR - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2181
Commit - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/b5d4a35d90771ec86ce9cf28727f471ee589fb78
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
Pushed via:
PR - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2181
Commit - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/b5d4a35d90771ec86ce9cf28727f471ee589fb78
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
|
By
Wu, Hao A
·
#83432
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel][PATCH] BaseTools: Increase the DevicePath length for support more PCD value.
Xiaolu:
Can you calculate the required memory, then allocate it instead of use hard code memory length?
Thanks
Liming
Xiaolu:
Can you calculate the required memory, then allocate it instead of use hard code memory length?
Thanks
Liming
|
By
gaoliming
·
#83431
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v11 00/32] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support
Ok, then we have to wait.
Please aware that we are in the code freeze state. We may have to check in after WW50.
I would prefer to submit small patch set if possible. It is easy to get it
Ok, then we have to wait.
Please aware that we are in the code freeze state. We may have to check in after WW50.
I would prefer to submit small patch set if possible. It is easy to get it
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#83430
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v11 00/32] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support
[AMD Official Use Only]
Without UefiCpuPkg we will have a broken SNP support and I would prefer not to commit a broken SEV-SNP support. The UefiCpuPkg is required for the multiple CPU boot and based
[AMD Official Use Only]
Without UefiCpuPkg we will have a broken SNP support and I would prefer not to commit a broken SEV-SNP support. The UefiCpuPkg is required for the multiple CPU boot and based
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#83429
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/1] BaseTools: Fix StructurePcd offset error.
Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@...>
Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@...>
|
By
Bob Feng
·
#83428
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] BaseTools: Increase the DevicePath length for support more PCD value.
Xiaolu,
I think you could calculate the Str16 length based on the input argument Str.
Thanks,
Bob
Xiaolu,
I think you could calculate the Str16 length based on the input argument Str.
Thanks,
Bob
|
By
Bob Feng
·
#83427
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v11 00/32] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support
I recommend you split the patch set to OvmfPkg update and UefiPkg update, unless there is strong reason that you have to mix them together.
With that, I can merge the OvmfPkg at first and we can
I recommend you split the patch set to OvmfPkg update and UefiPkg update, unless there is strong reason that you have to mix them together.
With that, I can merge the OvmfPkg at first and we can
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#83426
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v11 00/32] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support
[AMD Official Use Only]
Hi,
I am not getting any response from the UefiCpuPkg maintainers, I am not sure if the Ray/Rahul are on vacation or need more information.
Jiewen and Gerd,
Any
[AMD Official Use Only]
Hi,
I am not getting any response from the UefiCpuPkg maintainers, I am not sure if the Ray/Rahul are on vacation or need more information.
Jiewen and Gerd,
Any
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#83425
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] MdePkg/Include: Smbios Specification 3.5.0 changes
Thanks for your update. Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>
Besides, I suggest you also update ShellPkg\Library\UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib\SmbiosView to support new added tables.
Thanks for your update. Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>
Besides, I suggest you also update ShellPkg\Library\UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib\SmbiosView to support new added tables.
|
By
gaoliming
·
#83424
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] BaseTools: Add authenticated variable store support
This patch looks good to me.
Liming, do you have any comments?
Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@...>
This patch looks good to me.
Liming, do you have any comments?
Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@...>
|
By
Bob Feng
·
#83423
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel][PATCH] BaseTools: Increase the DevicePath length for support more PCD value.
Xiaolu:
Why choose 4096? Is it enough?
Thanks
Liming
Xiaolu:
Why choose 4096? Is it enough?
Thanks
Liming
|
By
gaoliming
·
#83422
·
|
|
回复: [PATCH V5 1/3] MdePkg: Introduce CcMeasurementProtocol for CC Guest firmware
Min:
Thanks for your update. Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>
Thanks
Liming
0xae,
logged.
shall be
the
1
1
Min:
Thanks for your update. Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>
Thanks
Liming
0xae,
logged.
shall be
the
1
1
|
By
gaoliming
·
#83421
·
|
|
[PATCH V5 3/3] SecurityPkg: Support CcMeasurementProtocol in DxeTpmMeasurementLib
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625
DxeTpmMeasurementLib supports TPM based measurement in DXE phase.
After CcMeasurementProtocol is introduced, CC based measurement needs
to be
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625
DxeTpmMeasurementLib supports TPM based measurement in DXE phase.
After CcMeasurementProtocol is introduced, CC based measurement needs
to be
|
By
Min Xu
·
#83420
·
|
|
[PATCH V5 2/3] SecurityPkg: Support CcMeasurementProtocol in DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625
DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib supports TPM2 based measure boot. After
CcMeasurementProtocol is introduced, CC based measure boot needs to
be supported
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625
DxeTpm2MeasureBootLib supports TPM2 based measure boot. After
CcMeasurementProtocol is introduced, CC based measure boot needs to
be supported
|
By
Min Xu
·
#83419
·
|
|
[PATCH V5 1/3] MdePkg: Introduce CcMeasurementProtocol for CC Guest firmware
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625
CC guest is a Confidential Computing guest. If CC Guest firmware
supports measurement and an event is created, CC Guest firmware
is designed to
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625
CC guest is a Confidential Computing guest. If CC Guest firmware
supports measurement and an event is created, CC Guest firmware
is designed to
|
By
Min Xu
·
#83418
·
|
|
[PATCH V5 0/3] Introduce CcMeasurementProtocol into EDK2
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625
If Confidential Computing (Cc) firmware supports measurement and an
event is created, CC-Guest firmware is designed to report the event
log
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625
If Confidential Computing (Cc) firmware supports measurement and an
event is created, CC-Guest firmware is designed to report the event
log
|
By
Min Xu
·
#83417
·
|
|
Event: TianoCore Design Meeting - APAC/NAMO - 11/12/2021
#cal-reminder
Reminder: TianoCore Design Meeting - APAC/NAMO
When:
11/12/2021
9:30am to 10:30am
(UTC+08:00) Asia/Shanghai
Where:
Microsoft Teams
Organizer: Ray Ni ray.ni@...
View
Reminder: TianoCore Design Meeting - APAC/NAMO
When:
11/12/2021
9:30am to 10:30am
(UTC+08:00) Asia/Shanghai
Where:
Microsoft Teams
Organizer: Ray Ni ray.ni@...
View
|
By
devel@edk2.groups.io Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#83416
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] OvmfPkg: Enable physical presence interface for TPM 1.2
Fixed in v3 for microvm and Xen and Bhyve also.
You happen to know about the variable lock issue? Why does the variable need to be locked?
Thank you.
Stefan
Fixed in v3 for microvm and Xen and Bhyve also.
You happen to know about the variable lock issue? Why does the variable need to be locked?
Thank you.
Stefan
|
By
Stefan Berger
·
#83415
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] ArmPlatformPkg: Resolve build errors resulting from package moves
Hey Bret,
If I understood this correctly, this fixes build issues introduced with the move patch of the same series? In that case, is there no edk2 rule that every commit must compile for the whole
Hey Bret,
If I understood this correctly, this fixes build issues introduced with the move patch of the same series? In that case, is there no edk2 rule that every commit must compile for the whole
|
By
Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@...>
·
#83414
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Fix CPU stack guard support by aligning
GDT buffer
Hi Mike,
I am aware of this possibility, but it feels unnecessary ugly in my opinion. Marvin has already sent a patch alignment-related patches not so long ago[1], updating this with V3 and using as
Hi Mike,
I am aware of this possibility, but it feels unnecessary ugly in my opinion. Marvin has already sent a patch alignment-related patches not so long ago[1], updating this with V3 and using as
|
By
Vitaly Cheptsov
·
#83413
·
|