|
回复: edk2-stable202111 Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg AtaAtapiPassThru: Skip the potential NULL pointer access
Leif:
Thanks for your suggestion. I am OK to merge this patch into stable
tag20211.
Thanks
Liming
running
printed as
Leif:
Thanks for your suggestion. I am OK to merge this patch into stable
tag20211.
Thanks
Liming
running
printed as
|
By
gaoliming
·
#84017
·
|
|
Re: [Patch 09/12] ShellPkg: Update YAML to ignore specific ECC files/errors
Acked-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@...>
Thanks,
Zhichao
Acked-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@...>
Thanks,
Zhichao
|
By
Gao, Zhichao
·
#84016
·
|
|
Uncrustify Conversion Detailed Plan and Extended Hard Freeze
Hello,
Michael Kubacki and I have prepared the patches required to apply the
uncrustify changes and enable EDK II CI to check all submitted
patches have been run through uncrustify.
There are a
Hello,
Michael Kubacki and I have prepared the patches required to apply the
uncrustify changes and enable EDK II CI to check all submitted
patches have been run through uncrustify.
There are a
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#84015
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] .pytool/Plugin/Uncrustify: Add Uncrustify plugin
I just realized that I changed the plugin name in the patch but did not update the commit subject. Since I'm already planning to send a v4, I will update it to ".pytool/Plugin/UncrustifyCheck: Add
I just realized that I changed the plugin name in the patch but did not update the commit subject. Since I'm already planning to send a v4, I will update it to ".pytool/Plugin/UncrustifyCheck: Add
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#84014
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 1/1] .pytool/Plugin/Uncrustify: Add Uncrustify plugin
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3748
Adds a new CI plugin for Uncrustify. This is used to check
coding standard compliance
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3748
Adds a new CI plugin for Uncrustify. This is used to check
coding standard compliance
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#84013
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH V3 15/29] OvmfPkg: Update SecEntry.nasm to support Tdx
My apology - fix typo: objection on the discussion => objective on the discussion.
My apology - fix typo: objection on the discussion => objective on the discussion.
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#84012
·
|
|
[PATCH] uefi-sct/SctPkg:Enhance BBTestReadKeyStrokeExFunctionAutoTestCheckpoint1()
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2386
Enhance BBTestReadKeyStrokeExFunctionAutoTestCheckpoint1()
to handle ReadKeyStrokeEx implementation which returns EFI_NOT_READY
but without
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2386
Enhance BBTestReadKeyStrokeExFunctionAutoTestCheckpoint1()
to handle ReadKeyStrokeEx implementation which returns EFI_NOT_READY
but without
|
By
Gao Jie
·
#84011
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH V3 15/29] OvmfPkg: Update SecEntry.nasm to support Tdx
I think we are discussing under different context.
First, the term "isolation" shall be clarified.
In my context, "isolation" means two domain cannot impact each other.
The isolation is enforced by a
I think we are discussing under different context.
First, the term "isolation" shall be clarified.
In my context, "isolation" means two domain cannot impact each other.
The isolation is enforced by a
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#84010
·
|
|
Event: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO - 11/23/2021
#cal-reminder
Reminder: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO
When:
11/23/2021
6:30pm to 7:30pm
(UTC-08:00) America/Los
Reminder: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO
When:
11/23/2021
6:30pm to 7:30pm
(UTC-08:00) America/Los
|
By
devel@edk2.groups.io Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#84009
·
|
|
Re: [Patch 1/1] .azurepipelines/templates: Update max pipeline job time to 2 hours
Reviewed-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#84008
·
|
|
Re: [Patch 1/1] .azurepipelines/templates: Update max pipeline job time to 2 hours
I wouldn't expect it to extend past 1 hour that often either. An occasional audit sounds good though.
Do you think a BZ could be filed to track the ECC optimization work? I didn't see anything
I wouldn't expect it to extend past 1 hour that often either. An occasional audit sounds good though.
Do you think a BZ could be filed to track the ECC optimization work? I didn't see anything
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#84007
·
|
|
Re: [Patch 1/1] .azurepipelines/templates: Update max pipeline job time to 2 hours
Hi Michael,
I would like to see some optimization work applied to the ECC tool to see if
we can reduce the time that tool requires. If we find some easy improvements
that allow larger patch series
Hi Michael,
I would like to see some optimization work applied to the ECC tool to see if
we can reduce the time that tool requires. If we find some easy improvements
that allow larger patch series
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#84006
·
|
|
Re: [Patch 1/1] .azurepipelines/templates: Update max pipeline job time to 2 hours
Hi Mike,
Is the plan to keep it at a 2 hour limit indefinitely (not just for these large series currently outstanding)?
Thanks,
Michael
Hi Mike,
Is the plan to keep it at a 2 hour limit indefinitely (not just for these large series currently outstanding)?
Thanks,
Michael
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#84005
·
|
|
[Patch 1/1] .azurepipelines/templates: Update max pipeline job time to 2 hours
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3750
Large patches that modify a large number of files(e.g uncrustify)
take longer to process through CI checks such as ECC. Increase
the max job
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3750
Large patches that modify a large number of files(e.g uncrustify)
take longer to process through CI checks such as ECC. Increase
the max job
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#84004
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] .pytool/Plugin/Uncrustify: Add Uncrustify plugin
Sounds good. I'll include that in v3.
Sounds good. I'll include that in v3.
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#84003
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] .pytool/Plugin/Uncrustify: Add Uncrustify plugin
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the clarification.
It would be good to make it clear that UncrustifyCheck is by default enabled
for all packages and that the only way to disabled it is to add that section
to
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the clarification.
It would be good to make it clear that UncrustifyCheck is by default enabled
for all packages and that the only way to disabled it is to add that section
to
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#84002
·
|
|
Re: [Patch 00/12] Update Package YAML to ignore specific ECC files/errors
<michael.d.kinney@...> wrote:
Where needed,
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...>
<michael.d.kinney@...> wrote:
Where needed,
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...>
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#84001
·
|
|
Re: [Patch V2 1/1] .pytools/Plugin/LicenseCheck: Use temp directory for git diff output
Acked-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
Acked-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#84000
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] .pytool/Plugin/Uncrustify: Add Uncrustify plugin
Hi Mike,
I'm fine with changing the CI plugin name to "UncrustifyCheck". It does only check files. I will make this change in a V3.
That section does not need to be present. It is just giving an
Hi Mike,
I'm fine with changing the CI plugin name to "UncrustifyCheck". It does only check files. I will make this change in a V3.
That section does not need to be present. It is just giving an
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#83999
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] .pytool/Plugin/Uncrustify: Add Uncrustify plugin
Hi Mike,
The simplest way to stay up-to-date is to let the stuart_update command check that the local version matches the version specified in "uncrustify_ext_dep.yaml".
The version "73.0" is based
Hi Mike,
The simplest way to stay up-to-date is to let the stuart_update command check that the local version matches the version specified in "uncrustify_ext_dep.yaml".
The version "73.0" is based
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#83998
·
|