From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...> Fixes CodeQL alerts for CWE-457: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/457.html Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@...> Cc: Guomin Jiang

From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...> Fixes CodeQL alerts for CWE-457: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/457.html Checks the return value from `ASN1_get_object()` to verify

From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...> While more portable methods exist to handle these cases, this change does not attempt to do more than fix the immediate problem and follow the

From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...> Purdue Compiler Construction Tool Set (PCCTS) source code was copied/ pasted into BaseTools/Source/C/VfrCompile/Pccts/. The code contains tab

From: Erich McMillan <emcmillan@...> Details for these CodeQL alerts can be found here: - Pointer overflow check (cpp/pointer-overflow-check): -

From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...> Adds queries for the following: 1. cpp/conditionallyuninitializedvariable 2. cpp/pointer-overflow-check 3. cpp/overrunning-write 4.

Dionna, I can create a new patch that contains, the two Event definitions and the code that signals both events. I can use my patches that I already have and then add the code from your submission

I assume you are talking about x86? This is more complex than just instruction prefix. You need the CPU to be setup in big real mode via the GDT, so you basically have a 32-bit environment setup via

I saw no such event in the specification I thought that's the event you meant, since its mantis number is 2042, whereas before exit boot services is 2043. That fits the "same time" you mentioned in

Hi Dionna, I gave feedback about After Exit Boot Services event. Why is an After Ready To Boot signal now part of this series? Mike

Will you please comment on the patches in question where the error is? I don't follow what you're saying. Sounds good. -- -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)

I am confused. I see patches related to ReadyToBoot and ExitBootServices and they mix what is in description and what is in code. I recommend you coordinate and put together a clean set of patches

Add StandaloneMmIplPei IA32/X64 driver at PEI stage. FSP will use this driver to load Standalone MM code to dispatch other Standalone MM drivers. Signed-off-by: Hongbin1 Zhang

Given that I'm not particularly confident in how I've implemented the after_ready_to_boot spec, and you haven't implemented it, I'm not sure. I'm pursuing the before_exit_boot_services implementation

Mike, I did not create the code to signal the After Exit Boot Services event. Just the code that defines the event. I noticed that another submission authored by Dionna Glaze adds the code to signal

Reminder: TianoCore Community Meeting EMEA/NAMO When: Thursday, November 10, 2022 8:00am to 9:00am (UTC-08:00) America/Los Angeles Where: Microsoft Teams meeting Join on your computer or mobile

Dionna, So how should we want to handle this. Leave yours in or leave mine in.

Current default value for DMI tables in uni files is "Not Specified". This causes an error when running FWTS tests. To avoid these errors, and align more accurately with the SMBIOS spec, this value

Current default values in uni files are set to "Not Specified". This value causes errors in DMI tables when running FWTS tests. To avoid=20 these errors and align more closely with the SMBIOS spec,

Hello Jeff, The CM_ARM_PROC_HIERARCHY_INFO struct has a token that can be used for referencing. If there were generators for the _PSL method and the APMT table, this would be possible to avoid