|
Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI 6.4 SBSA generic watchdog renaming
Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@...>
Thanks,
Zhichao
Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@...>
Thanks,
Zhichao
|
By
Gao, Zhichao
·
#80395
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Support ACPI 6.4 in Acpiview PCCT parser
For this patch set, Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@...>
Thanks,
Zhichao
For this patch set, Reviewed-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@...>
Thanks,
Zhichao
|
By
Gao, Zhichao
·
#80394
·
|
|
Re: [Patch V2 2/2] UefiPayloadPkg: Dump hob info from gEdkiiBootManagerMenuFileGuid
Reviewed-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@...>
Reviewed-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@...>
|
By
Zhiguang Liu
·
#80393
·
|
|
Re: [Patch V2 1/2] UefiPayloadPkg: Fix the bug in dump guid HOB info functions
Thank Dun for the fix.
Reviewed-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@...>
Thank Dun for the fix.
Reviewed-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@...>
|
By
Zhiguang Liu
·
#80392
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] BaseTools: Switch to downloading the ARM/AARCH64 compiler from Arm's site
Acked-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...> for this patch set.
Thanks
Liming
Acked-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...> for this patch set.
Thanks
Liming
|
By
gaoliming
·
#80391
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v6 00/29] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support
Hi, Brijesh
if you are considering to introduce a new PcdConfidentialComputingCategory
as Jiewen suggested below:
I also have some suggestions.
As we have below definition in WorkArea.h
typedef
Hi, Brijesh
if you are considering to introduce a new PcdConfidentialComputingCategory
as Jiewen suggested below:
I also have some suggestions.
As we have below definition in WorkArea.h
typedef
|
By
Min Xu
·
#80390
·
|
|
Re: Compilation error in ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64.dsc
Hi, Pierre.
Thank you very much for quickly reply.
Based on Pierre's advice,
I deleted the edk2 directory that I had been using and ran the git clone of edk2 again,
also used the master branch to
Hi, Pierre.
Thank you very much for quickly reply.
Based on Pierre's advice,
I deleted the edk2 directory that I had been using and ran the git clone of edk2 again,
also used the master branch to
|
By
ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com
·
#80389
·
|
|
Re: Compilation error in ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64.dsc
Hi, Sami.
Thank you very much for quickly reply.
> Please let me know if switching to Python 3.7 does not fix this issue for you.
As advised, I compiled using Python-3.7 (Python-3.7.9).
If I
Hi, Sami.
Thank you very much for quickly reply.
> Please let me know if switching to Python 3.7 does not fix this issue for you.
As advised, I compiled using Python-3.7 (Python-3.7.9).
If I
|
By
ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com
·
#80388
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Ovmf: Disable the TPM2 platform hierarchy
Many reasons on an Entrypoint not called.
I share my experence below (I encountered all of them before):
1) You update the code in a wrong tree.
2) The image is not rebuild. You still use old
Many reasons on an Entrypoint not called.
I share my experence below (I encountered all of them before):
1) You update the code in a wrong tree.
2) The image is not rebuild. You still use old
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#80387
·
|
|
Re: Compilation error in ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64.dsc
Hi, Pierre.
Thank you very much for quickly reply.
Based on Pierre's advice,
I deleted the edk2 directory that I had been using and ran the git clone of edk2 again,
,also used the master branch to
Hi, Pierre.
Thank you very much for quickly reply.
Based on Pierre's advice,
I deleted the edk2 directory that I had been using and ran the git clone of edk2 again,
,also used the master branch to
|
By
ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com
·
#80386
·
|
|
Re: Compilation error in ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64.dsc
I forgot to mention that there may be problems with older python,
so I will basically use the newer versions of python as advised.
Best regards,
Shuuichrou.
I forgot to mention that there may be problems with older python,
so I will basically use the newer versions of python as advised.
Best regards,
Shuuichrou.
|
By
ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com
·
#80385
·
|
|
Re: Compilation error in ArmVExpress-FVP-AArch64.dsc
Hi, Sami.
Thank you very much for quickly reply.
> Please let me know if switching to Python 3.7 does not fix this issue for you.
As advised, I compiled using Python-3.7 (Python-3.7.9).
If I simply
Hi, Sami.
Thank you very much for quickly reply.
> Please let me know if switching to Python 3.7 does not fix this issue for you.
As advised, I compiled using Python-3.7 (Python-3.7.9).
If I simply
|
By
ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com
·
#80384
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel][edk2-platforms][PATCH V1 1/1] MinPlatformPkg/Variable*Lib: Build VariableRead and VariableWrite libs
That sounds very reasonable to me. I have done something similar with basic PPI/Protocol services to abstract phase specific differences that a lot of code simply doesn’t need to care about. I
That sounds very reasonable to me. I have done something similar with basic PPI/Protocol services to abstract phase specific differences that a lot of code simply doesn’t need to care about. I
|
By
Isaac Oram
·
#80383
·
|
|
[edk2-platforms][PATCH V1 1/1] WhitleyOpenBoardPkg/Build: Reduce debug output for default boot.
Replace Info with Load, so we still get component loading details
Cc: Isaac Oram <isaac.w.oram@...>
Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@...>
Cc: Chasel Chiu
Replace Info with Load, so we still get component loading details
Cc: Isaac Oram <isaac.w.oram@...>
Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@...>
Cc: Chasel Chiu
|
By
Isaac Oram
·
#80382
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [edk2-devel][edk2-platforms][PATCH V1 1/1] MinPlatformPkg/Variable*Lib: Build VariableRead and VariableWrite libs
Question:
I’ve recently brought up with some that the GetVariable##() functions in UefiLib are probably incorrect as they are written (because they assume things like gRT and gBS availability).
Question:
I’ve recently brought up with some that the GetVariable##() functions in UefiLib are probably incorrect as they are written (because they assume things like gRT and gBS availability).
|
By
Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
·
#80381
·
|
|
[edk2-platforms][PATCH V1 1/1] MinPlatformPkg/Variable*Lib: Build VariableRead and VariableWrite libs
Add the VariableReadLib and VariableWriteLib instances to Components to
ensure build when building MinPlatformPkg.dsc.
Add a NULL library instance that provides the non-functional library
instance for
Add the VariableReadLib and VariableWriteLib instances to Components to
ensure build when building MinPlatformPkg.dsc.
Add a NULL library instance that provides the non-functional library
instance for
|
By
Isaac Oram
·
#80380
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Ovmf: Disable the TPM2 platform hierarchy
I tried to import Tcg2PlatformDxe with it's .c and .inf files but cannot get its EntryPoint invoked when running OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc
I tried to import Tcg2PlatformDxe with it's .c and .inf files but cannot get its EntryPoint invoked when running OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc
|
By
Stefan Berger
·
#80379
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v6 00/29] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support
Thank you so much Yao for reviewing the patches. Based on some comments from Gerd I may update code around the reset vector area (mainly use the metadata format etc). For your comments regarding the
Thank you so much Yao for reviewing the patches. Based on some comments from Gerd I may update code around the reset vector area (mainly use the metadata format etc). For your comments regarding the
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#80378
·
|
|
[PATCH edk2-test v2 1/1] uefi-sct/SctPkg: fix BuildAtaDeviceNode()
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3290
When BuildAtaDeviceNode() is called with L"Ata(0,0,0)" it creates a node
Ata(1,1,0). This leads to test to an assertion failed test result
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3290
When BuildAtaDeviceNode() is called with L"Ata(0,0,0)" it creates a node
Ata(1,1,0). This leads to test to an assertion failed test result
|
By
Heinrich Schuchardt
·
#80377
·
|
|
[PATCH edk2-test 1/1] uefi-sct/SctPkg: unsupported TEXT_INPUT_EX.SetState
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3390
According to the UEFI specification
EFI_SIMPLE_TEXT_INPUT_EX_PROTOCOL.SetState() may return EFI_UNSUPPORTED if
"the device does not support
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3390
According to the UEFI specification
EFI_SIMPLE_TEXT_INPUT_EX_PROTOCOL.SetState() may return EFI_UNSUPPORTED if
"the device does not support
|
By
Heinrich Schuchardt
·
#80376
·
|