|
Re: [Patch V3 40/40] Maintainers.txt: Add TigerlakeSiliconPkg maintainers
The series has been pushed as d55602c~..ee33d4f
Thanks Again Heng!
The series has been pushed as d55602c~..ee33d4f
Thanks Again Heng!
|
By
Nate DeSimone
·
#71370
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Use XADD to avoid lock acquire/release
Hi Ray,
I really like the cleanup to remove hard coded offsets, but I think that change should be its own patch series.
Can we make the functional change to use XADD as its own patch series before
Hi Ray,
I really like the cleanup to remove hard coded offsets, but I think that change should be its own patch series.
Can we make the functional change to use XADD as its own patch series before
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#71369
·
|
|
Re: EDK2
One I know the file path, I usually use a Notepad++ feature:
Search-> Find Chars In Range-> Non ASCII
Mike
One I know the file path, I usually use a Notepad++ feature:
Search-> Find Chars In Range-> Non ASCII
Mike
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#71368
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v6 7/9] OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm: add CpuEject()
Hi Ankur,
I figure it's prudent for me to follow up here too:
Please *do* add the volatile, and also the MemoryFence(). When built
with Visual Studio, MemoryFence() does nothing at all (at least
Hi Ankur,
I figure it's prudent for me to follow up here too:
Please *do* add the volatile, and also the MemoryFence(). When built
with Visual Studio, MemoryFence() does nothing at all (at least
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#71367
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 2/2] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandlerLib: Clear CET shadow stack token busy bit
I'll let others review this patch.
I'm OK to add macros to the nasm.inc files under MdePkg, as wrappers for
the DB-encoded CET instructions, as long as you also file a reminder BZ
to replace the DBs
I'll let others review this patch.
I'm OK to add macros to the nasm.inc files under MdePkg, as wrappers for
the DB-encoded CET instructions, as long as you also file a reminder BZ
to replace the DBs
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#71366
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Use XADD to avoid lock acquire/release
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#71365
·
|
|
Re: EDK2
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
0x9d is one of those pesky "smart quotes" many applications love to use. These are the double quote or single quote characters that slant left and
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
0x9d is one of those pesky "smart quotes" many applications love to use. These are the double quote or single quote characters that slant left and
|
By
Kirkendall, Garrett
·
#71364
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Use NASM struc to avoid hardcode offset
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#71363
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] MdePkg/Nasm.inc: add macros for C types used in structure definition
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#71362
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 05/27] ArmPkg: Fix Ecc error 9005 in CpuDxe
Hi Pierre,
This patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
Hi Pierre,
This patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
|
By
Sami Mujawar
·
#71361
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 04/27] ArmPkg: Fix Ecc error 8001 in ArmArchTimerLib
Hi Pierre,
Thank you for this patch.
Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
Hi Pierre,
Thank you for this patch.
Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
|
By
Sami Mujawar
·
#71360
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 03/27] ArmPkg: Fix Ecc error 8001 in Chipset
There is no code change in this file. Can you exclude the changes in this file from the patch, please?
With that changed:
Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
There is no code change in this file. Can you exclude the changes in this file from the patch, please?
With that changed:
Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
|
By
Sami Mujawar
·
#71359
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 02/27] ArmPkg: Fix Ecc error 8001 in SemihostLib
Thank you for this patch.
Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
Thank you for this patch.
Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
|
By
Sami Mujawar
·
#71358
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 01/27] ArmPkg: Fix Ecc error 8001 in Chipset
Hi Pierre,
There should be a single trailing underscore for #include guards. See
Hi Pierre,
There should be a single trailing underscore for #include guards. See
|
By
Sami Mujawar
·
#71357
·
|
|
Re: [Bug 3187] FaultTolerantWriteDxe defect will cause NVRAM not recovered after number of WorkSpaceRefresh().
After checking Bugzilla 3187, NVRAM already corrupted in this case. Sorry that I didn’t aware.
After checking Bugzilla 3187, NVRAM already corrupted in this case. Sorry that I didn’t aware.
|
By
Keysound Chang
·
#71356
·
|
|
Re: reg: iPxe Boot in NetworkPkg
Do you mean that you have set up an infinite loop in which UEFI loads ipxe.efi which loads ipxe.efi which loads ipxe.efi which loads ipxe.efi etc....?
If so, then my guess is that you are simply
Do you mean that you have set up an infinite loop in which UEFI loads ipxe.efi which loads ipxe.efi which loads ipxe.efi which loads ipxe.efi etc....?
If so, then my guess is that you are simply
|
By
Michael Brown
·
#71355
·
|
|
Re: ARM ltd. platform maintainership
Hi Sami,
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#71354
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandlerLib: Clear CET shadow stack token busy bit
Would you please add comment on why we need reserve and program the 8 bytes here?
Something like:
//
// The highest address on the stack (0xFF8) is a save-previous-ssp token pointing to a location
Would you please add comment on why we need reserve and program the 8 bytes here?
Something like:
//
// The highest address on the stack (0xFF8) is a save-previous-ssp token pointing to a location
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#71353
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 2/2] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandlerLib: Clear CET shadow stack token busy bit
Hi Jiewen, Eric, Ray, Rahul, Ersek,
I have updated the patch v2. And all comments are fixed.
Since open CI is using NASM 2.14.02, it has not supported CET instructions yet.
I would like to use DB xx
Hi Jiewen, Eric, Ray, Rahul, Ersek,
I have updated the patch v2. And all comments are fixed.
Since open CI is using NASM 2.14.02, it has not supported CET instructions yet.
I would like to use DB xx
|
By
Sheng Wei
·
#71352
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 1/1] UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandlerLib: Clear CET shadow stack token busy bit
If CET shadows stack feature enabled in SMM and stack switch is enabled.
When code execute from SMM handler to SMM exception, CPU will check SMM
exception shadow stack token busy bit if it is cleared
If CET shadows stack feature enabled in SMM and stack switch is enabled.
When code execute from SMM handler to SMM exception, CPU will check SMM
exception shadow stack token busy bit if it is cleared
|
By
Sheng Wei
·
#71351
·
|