|
Re: 回复: [PATCH v1 01/28] MdeModulePkg: Add a new GUID
Hi Judah,
You could update the readme in edk2-staging or your own forked branch.
Here's an example in edk2-staging repo:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-staging/tree/ProtectedVariable/libs
BTW,
Hi Judah,
You could update the readme in edk2-staging or your own forked branch.
Here's an example in edk2-staging repo:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-staging/tree/ProtectedVariable/libs
BTW,
|
By
Wang, Jian J
·
#88153
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 02/28] SecurityPkg: Add new GUIDs
Hi Judah,
The commit message is too simple to be useful for reviewers and developers.
Other patches have the same issue. Please add more descriptions to explain
the changes made in each patch (why
Hi Judah,
The commit message is too simple to be useful for reviewers and developers.
Other patches have the same issue. Please add more descriptions to explain
the changes made in each patch (why
|
By
Wang, Jian J
·
#88152
·
|
|
[PATCH v1 1/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Add dependency of VariableSmm driver.
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
UefiCpuPkg define a new Protocol with the new services
SmmWaitForAllProcessor(), which can be used by SMI handler
to optionally wait for
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
UefiCpuPkg define a new Protocol with the new services
SmmWaitForAllProcessor(), which can be used by SMI handler
to optionally wait for
|
By
Li, Zhihao
·
#88151
·
|
|
[PATCH v1 1/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Add dependency of VariableSmm driver.
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
UefiCpuPkg define a new Protocol with the new services
SmmWaitForAllProcessor(), which can be used by SMI handler
to optionally wait for
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
UefiCpuPkg define a new Protocol with the new services
SmmWaitForAllProcessor(), which can be used by SMI handler
to optionally wait for
|
By
Li, Zhihao
·
#88150
·
|
|
[PATCH v1 1/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Add dependency of VariableSmm driver.
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
UefiCpuPkg define a new Protocol with the new services
SmmWaitForAllProcessor(), which can be used by SMI handler
to optionally wait for
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
UefiCpuPkg define a new Protocol with the new services
SmmWaitForAllProcessor(), which can be used by SMI handler
to optionally wait for
|
By
Li, Zhihao
·
#88149
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/2] UefiPayloadPkg: Add a new DebugPrintErrorLevelLib instance
I replied in another email. It looks the comments are not addressed in this patch, especially on this comment:
In the DebugPrintErrorLevel.h, ErrorLevel is defined as UINT32, but its usage is not
I replied in another email. It looks the comments are not addressed in this patch, especially on this comment:
In the DebugPrintErrorLevel.h, ErrorLevel is defined as UINT32, but its usage is not
|
By
Guo Dong
·
#88148
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 3/3] Basetools: turn off gcc12 warning
Hi Gerd,
Could you provide a patch to fix this issue or revert the original commit?
Thanks,
Bob
Hi Gerd,
Could you provide a patch to fix this issue or revert the original commit?
Thanks,
Bob
|
By
Bob Feng
·
#88147
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 01/28] MdeModulePkg: Add a new GUID
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@...>
Regards,
Jian
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@...>
Regards,
Jian
|
By
Wang, Jian J
·
#88146
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 14/17] Silicon/Ampere: Update ArmPlatformLib to work with changed ARM_CORE_INFO
Thanks, Leif. I'm happy to hear that.
It seems like you have not reviewed the v5 of patch 30 yet.
Best regards,
Nhi
Thanks, Leif. I'm happy to hear that.
It seems like you have not reviewed the v5 of patch 30 yet.
Best regards,
Nhi
|
By
Nhi Pham
·
#88145
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] bRefClkFreq UFS card attribute need to be programmed after fDeviceInit
Pushed via:
PR - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2701
Commit - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/7456990e8eebe3b935447253bb6d1d3129839122
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
Pushed via:
PR - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/2701
Commit - https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/7456990e8eebe3b935447253bb6d1d3129839122
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
|
By
Wu, Hao A
·
#88144
·
|
|
Event: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO - 03/29/2022
#cal-reminder
Reminder: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO
When:
03/29/2022
6:30pm to 7:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los
Reminder: TianoCore Bug Triage - APAC / NAMO
When:
03/29/2022
6:30pm to 7:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los
|
By
devel@edk2.groups.io Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#88143
·
|
|
Now: Tools, CI, Code base construction meeting series - 03/28/2022
#cal-notice
Tools, CI, Code base construction meeting series
When:
03/28/2022
4:30pm to 5:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/discussions/2614
View
Tools, CI, Code base construction meeting series
When:
03/28/2022
4:30pm to 5:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/discussions/2614
View
|
By
devel@edk2.groups.io Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#88142
·
|
|
Re: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] MdeModulePkg: PiSmmCore: Inspect memory guarded with pool headers
Thanks, Liming.
SMM owners/authors,
Could you please also review the original issue and this patch to provide feedback?
Thanks,
Kun
Thanks, Liming.
SMM owners/authors,
Could you please also review the original issue and this patch to provide feedback?
Thanks,
Kun
|
By
Kun Qin
·
#88141
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 3/3] Basetools: turn off gcc12 warning
This breaks building BaseTools with clang 13.1.6 on macOS:
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make -C DevicePath
gcc -c -I .. -I ../Include/Common -I ../Include/ -I
This breaks building BaseTools with clang 13.1.6 on macOS:
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make -C DevicePath
gcc -c -I .. -I ../Include/Common -I ../Include/ -I
|
By
Rebecca Cran
·
#88140
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/2] OvmfPkg/AmdSev: Reorder MEMFD pages to match the order in OvmfPkgX64.fdf
Reorder the pages in the MEMFD section of AmdSevX64.fdf so that it
matches the same order used in OvmfPkgX64.fdf.
After this change, this is the difference in the MEMFD of the two
targets:
$ diff -u
Reorder the pages in the MEMFD section of AmdSevX64.fdf so that it
matches the same order used in OvmfPkgX64.fdf.
After this change, this is the difference in the MEMFD of the two
targets:
$ diff -u
|
By
Dov Murik
·
#88139
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/2] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: Exclude SEV launch secrets page from pre-validation
In order to allow the VMM (such as QEMU) to add a page with hashes of
kernel/initrd/cmdline for measured direct boot on SNP, this page must
not be part of the SNP metadata list reported to the
In order to allow the VMM (such as QEMU) to add a page with hashes of
kernel/initrd/cmdline for measured direct boot on SNP, this page must
not be part of the SNP metadata list reported to the
|
By
Dov Murik
·
#88138
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/2] OvmfPkg: Enable measured direct boot on AMD SEV-SNP
AMD SEV and SEV-ES support measured direct boot with
kernel/initrd/cmdline hashes injected by QEMU and verified by OVMF
during boot.
To enable the same approach for AMD SEV-SNP we make sure the page
AMD SEV and SEV-ES support measured direct boot with
kernel/initrd/cmdline hashes injected by QEMU and verified by OVMF
during boot.
To enable the same approach for AMD SEV-SNP we make sure the page
|
By
Dov Murik
·
#88137
·
|
|
Re: Question about UEFI, AddressSanitizer and MMU mappings
Hi Steven!
Good to know you already have something. I removed your LLVM Optimizations suggestion that was about MPX, as Intel MPX is pretty dead (Intel is dropping it, compilers don't support it) as
Hi Steven!
Good to know you already have something. I removed your LLVM Optimizations suggestion that was about MPX, as Intel MPX is pretty dead (Intel is dropping it, compilers don't support it) as
|
By
Pedro Falcato
·
#88136
·
|
|
Re: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 00/41] Add PrmPkg
Hi Liming,
I updated Maintainers.txt in patch [40/41].
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/87882
Due to the email limit on the mailing list the last few patches had to be sent shortly after the
Hi Liming,
I updated Maintainers.txt in patch [40/41].
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/87882
Due to the email limit on the mailing list the last few patches had to be sent shortly after the
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#88135
·
|
|
[PATCH] Fix Setup numeric default value incorrect issue
When default/manufacturing flag get removed from numeric varid, it can't
get default value from StructurePcd in 'UpdateDefaultSettingInFormPackage'
function since there is no EFI_IFR_DEFAULT_OP opcode
When default/manufacturing flag get removed from numeric varid, it can't
get default value from StructurePcd in 'UpdateDefaultSettingInFormPackage'
function since there is no EFI_IFR_DEFAULT_OP opcode
|
By
Chen Lin Z
·
#88134
·
|