|
Re: [PATCH V5 18/33] OvmfPkg: Check Tdx in QemuFwCfgPei to avoid DMA operation
Hi,
I think once the "SEV BaseMemEncryptLib cleanup" series by Brijesh is
merged it should be possible to use CcWorkAreaHeader->GuestType to
detect both sev and tdx and simplify the code here a
Hi,
I think once the "SEV BaseMemEncryptLib cleanup" series by Brijesh is
merged it should be possible to use CcWorkAreaHeader->GuestType to
detect both sev and tdx and simplify the code here a
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#86083
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH V5 17/33] OvmfPkg: Update Sec to support Tdx
Hi,
Is there a good reason to not use 2M by default? In case that fails the
code will fallback to 4K pages, so there isn't an obvious reason for
that ...
Hmm, does this PCD allow using 1G pages
Hi,
Is there a good reason to not use 2M by default? In case that fails the
code will fallback to 4K pages, so there isn't an obvious reason for
that ...
Hmm, does this PCD allow using 1G pages
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#86082
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH V5 14/33] OvmfPkg: Add IntelTdx.h in OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
take care,
Gerd
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
take care,
Gerd
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#86081
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH V5 05/33] OvmfPkg: Extend VmgExitLib to handle #VE exception
#ve
Hi,
Ah, very nice, the instruction decoder replaced by three lines
of code ;)
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
take care,
Gerd
Hi,
Ah, very nice, the instruction decoder replaced by three lines
of code ;)
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
take care,
Gerd
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#86080
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 00/24] CryptoPkg/openssl: update openssl submodule to v3.0
Hi,
Yes. But apparently there is no way around them. We have them for arm.
We have them for openssl. IntelUndiPkg in edk2-staging has some too
(see IntelUndiPkg/LibC). And I wouldn't be surprised
Hi,
Yes. But apparently there is no way around them. We have them for arm.
We have them for openssl. IntelUndiPkg in edk2-staging has some too
(see IntelUndiPkg/LibC). And I wouldn't be surprised
|
By
Gerd Hoffmann
·
#86079
·
|
|
[Patch 1/2] BaseTools: Update brotli submodule
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3D3417
Update the brotli submodule to the latest commit (f4153a0)
so that the build isn't broken in GCC 11 compilers.
Signed-off-by: Bob Feng
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3D3417
Update the brotli submodule to the latest commit (f4153a0)
so that the build isn't broken in GCC 11 compilers.
Signed-off-by: Bob Feng
|
By
Bob Feng
·
#86078
·
|
|
[Patch 2/2] MdeModulePkg: update brotli submodule
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3417
Update the brotli submodule to the latest commit (f4153a0)
so that the build isn't broken in GCC 11 compilers.
Cc: Hao A Wu
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3417
Update the brotli submodule to the latest commit (f4153a0)
so that the build isn't broken in GCC 11 compilers.
Cc: Hao A Wu
|
By
Bob Feng
·
#86077
·
|
|
[PATCH] NetworkPkg: Fix incorrect unicode string of the AKM/Cipher Suite
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
The size of buffer should be 3 CHAR16 for Null-terminated Unicode string.
The first char is the AKM/Cipher Suite number, the second char is '
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
The size of buffer should be 3 CHAR16 for Null-terminated Unicode string.
The first char is the AKM/Cipher Suite number, the second char is '
|
By
Heng Luo
·
#86076
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [Patch] BaseTools/Conf: Add new macro for customizing dll file reduction.
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>
|
By
gaoliming
·
#86075
·
|
|
回复: [PATCH v3 0/6] MM communicate functionality in variable policy
Hi, all
If no other comment, I will merge this patch set tomorrow.
Thanks
Liming
Hi, all
If no other comment, I will merge this patch set tomorrow.
Thanks
Liming
|
By
gaoliming
·
#86074
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/2] SEV BaseMemEncryptLib cleanup
I ran into a regression for non-SEV guest, let me work to fix and post v2.
-Brijesh
I ran into a regression for non-SEV guest, let me work to fix and post v2.
-Brijesh
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#86073
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 00/24] CryptoPkg/openssl: update openssl submodule to v3.0
Hi Mike,
thank you for your explanation. I understand all the technical aspects.
But let me go into the details of my approach, that skips step 2) to 5)
and adds step 1.5)
>I think in
Hi Mike,
thank you for your explanation. I understand all the technical aspects.
But let me go into the details of my approach, that skips step 2) to 5)
and adds step 1.5)
>I think in
|
By
Kilian Kegel
·
#86072
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 6/6] ArmPkg: MmCommunicationDxe: Update MM communicate `MessageLength` check
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751
Current MM communicate routine from ArmPkg would conduct few checks prior
to proceeding with SMC calls. However, the inspection step is
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751
Current MM communicate routine from ArmPkg would conduct few checks prior
to proceeding with SMC calls. However, the inspection step is
|
By
Kun Qin
·
#86071
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 5/6] ArmPkg: MmCommunicationDxe: Update MM communicate `CommSize` check
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751
Current MM communicate routine from ArmPkg would conduct few checks prior
to proceeding with SMC calls. However, the inspection step is
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751
Current MM communicate routine from ArmPkg would conduct few checks prior
to proceeding with SMC calls. However, the inspection step is
|
By
Kun Qin
·
#86070
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 4/6] ArmPkg: MmCommunicationDxe: Update MM communicate `CommBuffer**` checks
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751
Current MM communicate routine from ArmPkg would conduct few checks prior
to proceeding with SMC calls. However, the inspection step is
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751
Current MM communicate routine from ArmPkg would conduct few checks prior
to proceeding with SMC calls. However, the inspection step is
|
By
Kun Qin
·
#86069
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 3/6] ArmPkg: MmCommunicationDxe: MM communicate function argument attributes
Current MM communicate2 function from ArmPkg described input arguments
`CommBufferPhysical`, `CommBufferVirtual` and `CommSize` as input only,
which mismatches with the "input and output type" as in
Current MM communicate2 function from ArmPkg described input arguments
`CommBufferPhysical`, `CommBufferVirtual` and `CommSize` as input only,
which mismatches with the "input and output type" as in
|
By
Kun Qin
·
#86068
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 2/6] MdePkg: MmCommunication2: Update MM communicate2 function description
Current MM communicate2 function definition described input arguments
`CommBufferPhysical`, `CommBufferVirtual` and `CommSize` as input only,
which mismatches with the "input and output type" as in PI
Current MM communicate2 function definition described input arguments
`CommBufferPhysical`, `CommBufferVirtual` and `CommSize` as input only,
which mismatches with the "input and output type" as in PI
|
By
Kun Qin
·
#86067
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 1/6] MdeModulePkg: VariableSmmRuntimeDxe: Fix Variable Policy Message Length
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3709
In EDKII implementation of variable policy, the DXE runtime agent would
communicate to MM to disable, register or query policies. However,
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3709
In EDKII implementation of variable policy, the DXE runtime agent would
communicate to MM to disable, register or query policies. However,
|
By
Kun Qin
·
#86066
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 0/6] MM communicate functionality in variable policy
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3709
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751
This patch series is a follow up of previous
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3709
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751
This patch series is a follow up of previous
|
By
Kun Qin
·
#86065
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] EDK2 Code First: PI Specification: New error codes of Host Software class
Hi Mike,
Sorry if the questions are being naive. My interpretation for the code-first process below is that we need to first obtain "Reviewed-By" tags for all patches in this branch on this mailing
Hi Mike,
Sorry if the questions are being naive. My interpretation for the code-first process below is that we need to first obtain "Reviewed-By" tags for all patches in this branch on this mailing
|
By
Kun Qin
·
#86064
·
|