|
Re: [PATCH v11 00/32] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support
Hi Ray and Rahul,
Gentle ping. Could you please Ack or R-b the files touched in UefiCpuPkg?
-Brijesh
Hi Ray and Rahul,
Gentle ping. Could you please Ack or R-b the files touched in UefiCpuPkg?
-Brijesh
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#82962
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] RedfishPkg: Add more information to Readme.md
Reviewed-by: Nickle Wang <nickle.wang@...>
Thanks,
Nickle
Reviewed-by: Nickle Wang <nickle.wang@...>
Thanks,
Nickle
|
By
Nickle Wang
·
#82961
·
|
|
[edk2-libc Patch v3 3/5] AppPkg/Applications/Python: to remove py2.7.10 support from edk2-libc
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
This commit is to remove the support of py 2.7.10 UEFI port.
Py2.7.10 is no more supported as it has reached EOL starting
from 1st Jan 2020.
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
This commit is to remove the support of py 2.7.10 UEFI port.
Py2.7.10 is no more supported as it has reached EOL starting
from 1st Jan 2020.
|
By
Jayaprakash, N
·
#82960
·
|
|
[edk2-libc Patch v3 5/5] AppPkg/Applications/Python: to update readme files in edk2-libc
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
This commit is to update references to py 2.7.10 in
StdLib/Readme.txt and StdLibPrivateInternalFiles/ReadMe.txt
documents to py3.6.8.
Cc:
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
This commit is to update references to py 2.7.10 in
StdLib/Readme.txt and StdLibPrivateInternalFiles/ReadMe.txt
documents to py3.6.8.
Cc:
|
By
Jayaprakash, N
·
#82959
·
|
|
[edk2-libc Patch v3 4/5] AppPkg/Applications/Python: to remove py2.7.10 references from edk2-libc
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
This commit is to remove the document references to py 2.7.10
UEFI port. Py2.7.10 is no more supported as it has reached EOL
starting from 1st
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
This commit is to remove the document references to py 2.7.10
UEFI port. Py2.7.10 is no more supported as it has reached EOL
starting from 1st
|
By
Jayaprakash, N
·
#82958
·
|
|
[edk2-libc Patch v3 1/5] AppPkg/Applications/Python: To remove the py2.7.2 uefi port code
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
This commit is to remove the UEFI port of py 2.7.2 code
from the edk2-libc git repo. This is an outdated python
version and is not supported
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
This commit is to remove the UEFI port of py 2.7.2 code
from the edk2-libc git repo. This is an outdated python
version and is not supported
|
By
Jayaprakash, N
·
#82957
·
|
|
[edk2-libc Patch v3 2/5] AppPkg/Applications/Python: to remove document references to py2.7.2
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
This commit is to remove references to the py 2.7.2 UEFI port
in all documents from edk2-libc repo. This python interpreter
is no more
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
This commit is to remove references to the py 2.7.2 UEFI port
in all documents from edk2-libc repo. This python interpreter
is no more
|
By
Jayaprakash, N
·
#82956
·
|
|
[edk2-libc Patch v3 0/5] AppPkg/Applications/Python: To remove the py2.7 support from edk2-libc
Jayaprakash Nevara (5):
AppPkg/Applications/Python: To remove the py2.7.2 uefi port code
AppPkg/Applications/Python: to remove document references to py2.7.2
AppPkg/Applications/Python: to
Jayaprakash Nevara (5):
AppPkg/Applications/Python: To remove the py2.7.2 uefi port code
AppPkg/Applications/Python: to remove document references to py2.7.2
AppPkg/Applications/Python: to
|
By
Jayaprakash, N
·
#82955
·
|
|
Adding another platform language
Hello!
I was investigating the possibility of adding localization strings at
runtime. Is it possible to create another translation language at
runtime (UEFI Shell)?
From my understanding OVMF gets
Hello!
I was investigating the possibility of adding localization strings at
runtime. Is it possible to create another translation language at
runtime (UEFI Shell)?
From my understanding OVMF gets
|
By
Konstantin Aladyshev
·
#82954
·
|
|
Ways to add a string package of different language at runtime
Hello!
I was investigating the possibility of adding localization strings at
runtime. I've noticed that
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/PlatformDxe/Platform.uni
has strings only
Hello!
I was investigating the possibility of adding localization strings at
runtime. I've noticed that
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/OvmfPkg/PlatformDxe/Platform.uni
has strings only
|
By
Konstantin Aladyshev
·
#82953
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 2/2] OvmfPkg: Switch timer in build time for OvmfPkg
Ah, thanks for reminder. The default value is 200000000. It will be fixed in the next version.
That is because of below error when build
Ah, thanks for reminder. The default value is 200000000. It will be fixed in the next version.
That is because of below error when build
|
By
Min Xu
·
#82952
·
|
|
[PATCH] RedfishPkg: Add more information to Readme.md
Add more information of network settings for EDK2
Redfish service on EmulatorPkg.
Signed-off-by: Abner Chang <abner.chang@...>
Cc: Nickle Wang <nickle.wang@...>
Cc: Liming Gao
Add more information of network settings for EDK2
Redfish service on EmulatorPkg.
Signed-off-by: Abner Chang <abner.chang@...>
Cc: Nickle Wang <nickle.wang@...>
Cc: Liming Gao
|
By
Abner Chang
·
#82951
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] Reallocate TPM Active PCRs based on platform support.
Hi Jiewen,
In the past most of the TPM devices supported SHA1 and SHA256 hashing algorithms, which we have also supported in BIOS for many years.
What recently changed is the exposure to new TPM
Hi Jiewen,
In the past most of the TPM devices supported SHA1 and SHA256 hashing algorithms, which we have also supported in BIOS for many years.
What recently changed is the exposure to new TPM
|
By
Rodrigo Gonzalez del Cueto
·
#82950
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-discuss] [edk2-rfc] Inclusive Language RFC
Hello Marvin,
Your concerns have been heard, but providing a list of every alternative for every scenario and how/when to use them would be unreasonable.
We would expect developers to use their
Hello Marvin,
Your concerns have been heard, but providing a list of every alternative for every scenario and how/when to use them would be unreasonable.
We would expect developers to use their
|
By
Teng, Lynn L
·
#82949
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v6 06/52] IntelSiliconPkg: Add PCH SPI PPI
Hi Nate,
I will send a separate patch series that removes the v1 PPI and Protocol.
Thanks,
Michael
Hi Nate,
I will send a separate patch series that removes the v1 PPI and Protocol.
Thanks,
Michael
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#82948
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v6 06/52] IntelSiliconPkg: Add PCH SPI PPI
Hi Michael,
Looking at your new patch series, now that we have the new PCH_SPI2_PPI, there is no longer any need for the existence of IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Ppi/Spi.h. The PCH_SPI_PPI will always be
Hi Michael,
Looking at your new patch series, now that we have the new PCH_SPI2_PPI, there is no longer any need for the existence of IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Ppi/Spi.h. The PCH_SPI_PPI will always be
|
By
Nate DeSimone
·
#82947
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v6 07/52] IntelSiliconPkg: Add PCH SPI Protocol
Hi Michael,
Looking at your new patch series, now that we have the new PCH_SPI2_PROTOCOL, there is no longer any need for the existence of IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/Spi.h. The PCH_SPI_PROTOCOL
Hi Michael,
Looking at your new patch series, now that we have the new PCH_SPI2_PROTOCOL, there is no longer any need for the existence of IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/Spi.h. The PCH_SPI_PROTOCOL
|
By
Nate DeSimone
·
#82946
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-platforms] [PATCH v1 1/2] MinPlatformPkg: Update APIC Table based on mode
Hi Abdul,
Excellent! I checked with the Windows kernel team as well and they don't believe there should be any issues. Therefore, I am approving your patch series as it
Hi Abdul,
Excellent! I checked with the Windows kernel team as well and they don't believe there should be any issues. Therefore, I am approving your patch series as it
|
By
Nate DeSimone
·
#82945
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] SecurityPkg: TPM must go to Idle state on CRB command completion.
Hi Jiewen,
I have tested the proposed CRB protocol fix with three different TPM configurations I have available which support the CRB interface: Intel PTT, STMicro and Nuvoton. Under these CRB
Hi Jiewen,
I have tested the proposed CRB protocol fix with three different TPM configurations I have available which support the CRB interface: Intel PTT, STMicro and Nuvoton. Under these CRB
|
By
Rodrigo Gonzalez del Cueto
·
#82944
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/DxeCapsuleLibFmp: Add runtime SetImage support
Hi Liming, See inline below.
Hi Liming, See inline below.
|
By
Bob Morgan
·
#82943
·
|