Hello, I would like to propose that we update to a newer version of NASM. https://www.nasm.us/ The most recent stable version is

Hi JP, Can you also update the documentation to remove references to Python 2.x or update for Python 3.x? For example, the following file has Python 2.x

[AMD Official Use Only] Gentle reminder to merge the code.

From: Joseph Hemann <Joseph.hemann@...> -add initial TCG2 protocol test for SubmitCommand() -checkpoint for test function with GET_RANDOM Command Cc: Barton Gao

From: Joseph Hemann <Joseph.hemann@...> -add initial TCG2 protocol test for GetEventLog() -checkpoint for test function with invalid eventlog format -checkpoint for test function with valid

From: Joseph Hemann <Joseph.hemann@...> -add initial TCG2 protocol test for HashLogExtendEvent() -checkpoint for test of function with invalid parameters -checkpoint for test of function with

From: Joseph Hemann <Joseph.hemann@...> -add initial TCG2 protocol test for GetActivePcrBanks() -checkpoint for NULL pointer passed for buffer -checkpoint for test of function with

From: Joseph Hemann <Joseph.hemann@...> -implement initial infrastructure for the TCG2 protocol test including updates to .dsc file, inf file, GUID source files, update to Category.ini. -add

From: Joseph Hemann <Joseph.hemann@...> Cc: Barton Gao <gaojie@...> Cc: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@...> Cc: Eric Jin <eric.jin@...> Cc: Arvin Chen

From: Joseph Hemann <Joseph.hemann@...> This patch series implements a set of SCT tests, for the TCG2 UEFI protocol as defined in the TCG EFI Protocol Specification. The series implements the

Hi Chris, Thanks for adding the comment that clarifies the usage. Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...> Regards, Sami Mujawar On 20/10/2021, 11:47, "Chris Jones"

Add a comment to clarify that in Acpiview the ItemPtr is not set until after the FieldValidator has been called. Signed-off-by: Chris Jones <christopher.jones@...> ---

Hi Pierre, Thank you for this fix. Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...> Regards, Sami Mujawar IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and

Merged as 37a33f02aa1a..4fdf843c75d2 Thanks. Regards, Sami Mujawar

Hi Moritz, Thank you for this fix. Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...> Regards, Sami Mujawar

Hi Jiewen, Please find my response inline marked [SAMI]. Regards, Sami Mujawar [SAMI] Agree. [SAMI] Ack. [SAMI] This is a good idea. If I understand correctly, there is this going to be a new enum

SystemTableInfo GUID is not a Spec defined GUID. The latest SBL and CBL produces ACPI and SMBIOS table information. So removing the SystemTableInfo GUID implementation. Cc: Guo Dong

SystemTableInfo GUID is not a Spec defined GUID. But the latest SBL uses SystemTableInfo to get ACPI and SMBIOS table information. So moving the SystemTableInfo GUID implementation to

Hi Liming The change "PATCH v6 1/3" is the same with "PATCH v3 1/3". The difference between "v3 to v6" is on "PATCH v6 3/3" Thanks, Ian Kuo

In the success case we should return EFI_SUCCESS rather than returning a potentially unitialized value of Status. Cc: Sami Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@...> Cc: Alexei Fedorov