|
[PATCH v3 06/28] AmpereAltraPkg: Add DwGpioLib library
From: Vu Nguyen <vunguyen@...>
The DwGpioLib library provides basic functions to control the GPIO
controller on Ampere Altra processor.
Cc: Chuong Tran
From: Vu Nguyen <vunguyen@...>
The DwGpioLib library provides basic functions to control the GPIO
controller on Ampere Altra processor.
Cc: Chuong Tran
|
By
Nhi Pham
·
#80707
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 05/28] AmpereAltraPkg: Add DwI2cLib library
From: Vu Nguyen <vunguyen@...>
The DwI2cLib library provides basic functions to control the I2C
controller on Ampere Altra processor.
Cc: Chuong Tran
From: Vu Nguyen <vunguyen@...>
The DwI2cLib library provides basic functions to control the I2C
controller on Ampere Altra processor.
Cc: Chuong Tran
|
By
Nhi Pham
·
#80706
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 04/28] AmperePlatformPkg: Add FailSafe and WDT support
The FailSafeDxe is a driver for the FailSafe feature which reverts the
system's configuration to known good values if the system fails to boot
up multiple times. Also, this driver implements the
The FailSafeDxe is a driver for the FailSafe feature which reverts the
system's configuration to known good values if the system fails to boot
up multiple times. Also, this driver implements the
|
By
Nhi Pham
·
#80705
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 01/28] Ampere: Initial support for Ampere Altra processor and Mt. Jade platform
From: Vu Nguyen <vunguyen@...>
This commit adds the support for Ampere’s Altra processor-based Mt. Jade
platform that provides up to 160 processor cores in a dual
From: Vu Nguyen <vunguyen@...>
This commit adds the support for Ampere’s Altra processor-based Mt. Jade
platform that provides up to 160 processor cores in a dual
|
By
Nhi Pham
·
#80704
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 03/28] AmperePlatformPkg: Implement FailSafe library
The Ampere Altra System Firmware provides a fail-safe feature to help
recover the system if there are setting changes such as Core voltage,
DRAM parameters that cause the UEFI failed to boot.
The
The Ampere Altra System Firmware provides a fail-safe feature to help
recover the system if there are setting changes such as Core voltage,
DRAM parameters that cause the UEFI failed to boot.
The
|
By
Nhi Pham
·
#80703
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 02/28] AmpereAltraPkg: Add MmCommunication modules
From: Vu Nguyen <vunguyen@...>
The MmCommunicationDxe module is derived from
ArmPkg/Drivers/MmCommunicationDxe/MmCommunication.inf.
The MmCommunication PEI and DXE modules
From: Vu Nguyen <vunguyen@...>
The MmCommunicationDxe module is derived from
ArmPkg/Drivers/MmCommunicationDxe/MmCommunication.inf.
The MmCommunication PEI and DXE modules
|
By
Nhi Pham
·
#80702
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 00/28] Add new Ampere Mt. Jade platform
This patch series adds the support for the Mt. Jade platform based on Ampere's
Altra Family Processor.
Notes:
+ The current patch series was tested with the edk2-stable202108 tag.
+ The IASL
This patch series adds the support for the Mt. Jade platform based on Ampere's
Altra Family Processor.
Notes:
+ The current patch series was tested with the edk2-stable202108 tag.
+ The IASL
|
By
Nhi Pham
·
#80701
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-platforms][PATCH v1 1/1] MinPlatformPkg/AcpiTables: Update structures for ACPI 6.3
Well that's a large number of conflicts.
I find it unprofessional that I have been waiting over a month for a MinPlatformPkg maintainer to review and merge my patch while the patches that were merged
Well that's a large number of conflicts.
I find it unprofessional that I have been waiting over a month for a MinPlatformPkg maintainer to review and merge my patch while the patches that were merged
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#80700
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/PciBusDxe: Enumerator to check for RCiEP before looking for RP
Should we consider this workaround? I’m having issues interpreting this part of PCIe spec.
My understanding of this quote is that this capability can exist in but it shouldn’t be considered.
I
Should we consider this workaround? I’m having issues interpreting this part of PCIe spec.
My understanding of this quote is that this capability can exist in but it shouldn’t be considered.
I
|
By
Bassa, Damian <damian.bassa@...>
·
#80699
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/1] ArmPkg/ProcessorSubClassDxe: Fix the format of ProcessorId
According to SMBIOS 3.4, section 7.5.3.3 ARM64-class CPUs, if
SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID is supported, the first DWORD is the JEP-106 code and
the second DWORD is the SoC revision value. But in the
According to SMBIOS 3.4, section 7.5.3.3 ARM64-class CPUs, if
SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID is supported, the first DWORD is the JEP-106 code and
the second DWORD is the SoC revision value. But in the
|
By
Nhi Pham
·
#80698
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/PciBusDxe: Enumerator to check for RCiEP before looking for RP
Extending PciBus to support such case is valid.
But can you check if there is other pure software way to detect whether it’s an ECiEP?
Extending PciBus to support such case is valid.
But can you check if there is other pure software way to detect whether it’s an ECiEP?
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#80697
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] OvmfPkg/BhyvePkg: add WorkAreaHeader PCD
Hi
To avoid unnecessary change in DSC/FDF, can we change default size to be 4 in DEC?
gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfConfidentialComputingWorkAreaHeader|4|UINT32|0x51
We shall also add comment on
Hi
To avoid unnecessary change in DSC/FDF, can we change default size to be 4 in DEC?
gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfConfidentialComputingWorkAreaHeader|4|UINT32|0x51
We shall also add comment on
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#80696
·
|
|
回复: [PATCH] [edk2-devel] RecordAssertion function parameter issue.
Reviewed-by: Barton Gao <gaojie@...>
Thanks
Barton
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: bounce+27952+68636+5325328+9289841@groups.io
<bounce+27952+68636+5325328+9289841@groups.io> 代表
Reviewed-by: Barton Gao <gaojie@...>
Thanks
Barton
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: bounce+27952+68636+5325328+9289841@groups.io
<bounce+27952+68636+5325328+9289841@groups.io> 代表
|
By
Gao Jie
·
#80695
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] UefiPayloadPkg: Fix the warning when building UefiPayloadPkg with IA32+X64
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#80694
·
|
|
[PATCH] OvmfPkg/BhyvePkg: add WorkAreaHeader PCD
SEC phase will throw an assertion in IsSevGuest if
PcdOvmfConfidentialComputingWorkAreaHeader doesn't match the
sizeof CONFIDENTIAL_COMPUTING_WORK_AREA_HEADER.
Signed-off-by: Corvin Köhne
SEC phase will throw an assertion in IsSevGuest if
PcdOvmfConfidentialComputingWorkAreaHeader doesn't match the
sizeof CONFIDENTIAL_COMPUTING_WORK_AREA_HEADER.
Signed-off-by: Corvin Köhne
|
By
Corvin Köhne
·
#80693
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] UefiPayloadPkg: Fix the warning when building UefiPayloadPkg with IA32+X64
Hi Ray,
There are only "UniversalPayloadEntry.inf" and "UefiPayloadEntry.inf" under [Components.IA32] in UefiPayloadPkg.dsc. The [Packages] sections in these two .inf file only contain MdePkg,
Hi Ray,
There are only "UniversalPayloadEntry.inf" and "UefiPayloadEntry.inf" under [Components.IA32] in UefiPayloadPkg.dsc. The [Packages] sections in these two .inf file only contain MdePkg,
|
By
duntan
·
#80692
·
|
|
[PATCH v6] UefiCpuPkg: VTF0 Linear-Address Translation to a 1-GByte Page till 512GB
[edk2-devel] [PATCH V5]
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3473
X64 Reset Vector Code can access the memory range till 4GB using the
Linear-Address Translation to a 2-MByte Page, when
[edk2-devel] [PATCH V5]
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3473
X64 Reset Vector Code can access the memory range till 4GB using the
Linear-Address Translation to a 2-MByte Page, when
|
By
Ashraf Ali S
·
#80691
·
|
|
[PATCH v5] UefiCpuPkg: VTF0 Linear-Address Translation to a 1-GByte Page till 512GB
[edk2-devel] [PATCH V5]
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3473
X64 Reset Vector Code can access the memory range till 4GB using the
Linear-Address Translation to a 2-MByte Page, when
[edk2-devel] [PATCH V5]
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3473
X64 Reset Vector Code can access the memory range till 4GB using the
Linear-Address Translation to a 2-MByte Page, when
|
By
Ashraf Ali S
·
#80690
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/2] MdePkg: Introduce TdProtocol for TD-Guest firmware
Hi, Liming
TD Protocol is defined in below spec (Section 4.3.2)
https://software.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/intel-tdx-guest-hypervisor-communication-interface.pdf
This
Hi, Liming
TD Protocol is defined in below spec (Section 4.3.2)
https://software.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/intel-tdx-guest-hypervisor-communication-interface.pdf
This
|
By
Min Xu
·
#80689
·
|
|
回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] MdePkg: Introduce TdProtocol for TD-Guest firmware
Min:
Which public spec defines this new protocol?
Thanks
Liming
structure
0xae,
logged.
shall be
the
1
1
Min:
Which public spec defines this new protocol?
Thanks
Liming
structure
0xae,
logged.
shall be
the
1
1
|
By
gaoliming
·
#80688
·
|