|
[edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 4/4] MinPlatformPkg/TpmPlatformHierarchyLib: Add disable support
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3411
Adds a new PCD (PcdRandomizePlatformHierarchy) to MinPlatformPkg.dec
that allows a
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3411
Adds a new PCD (PcdRandomizePlatformHierarchy) to MinPlatformPkg.dec
that allows a
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#76145
·
|
|
[edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 3/4] MinPlatformPkg/Tcg2PlatformPei: Use TpmPlatformHierarchyLib
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
Eliminates code duplication in the module with
TpmPlatformHierarchyLib. Pre-existing behavior of randomzing the
TPM platform auth is retained by
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
Eliminates code duplication in the module with
TpmPlatformHierarchyLib. Pre-existing behavior of randomzing the
TPM platform auth is retained by
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#76144
·
|
|
[edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 2/4] MinPlatformPkg/TpmPlatformHierarchyLib: Add PEI support
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
Expands the TpmPlatformHierarchyLib instance in MinPlatformPkg to
support PEIM in addition to DXE_DRIVER.
Cc: Nate DeSimone
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
Expands the TpmPlatformHierarchyLib instance in MinPlatformPkg to
support PEIM in addition to DXE_DRIVER.
Cc: Nate DeSimone
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#76143
·
|
|
[edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 1/4] MinPlatformPkg: Add TpmPlatformHierarchyLib to Components in DSC
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
Adds TpmPlatformHierarchyLib to the [Components] section in
MinPlatformPkg.dsc so it is always built in the package build.
Cc: Nate DeSimone
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
Adds TpmPlatformHierarchyLib to the [Components] section in
MinPlatformPkg.dsc so it is always built in the package build.
Cc: Nate DeSimone
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#76142
·
|
|
[edk2-platforms][PATCH v2 0/4] MinPlatformPkg: Add TPM platform hier disable support
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3411
This patch series adds support in TpmPlatformHierarchyLib to either
randomize the
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3411
This patch series adds support in TpmPlatformHierarchyLib to either
randomize the
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#76141
·
|
|
[PATCH v1 1/1] MdeModulePkg/BdsDxe: Update BdsEntry to use Variable Policy
From: Ken Lautner <klautner@...>
Changed BdsEntry.c to use Variable Policy instead of Variable Lock
as Variable Lock will be Deprecated eventually
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@...>
Cc:
From: Ken Lautner <klautner@...>
Changed BdsEntry.c to use Variable Policy instead of Variable Lock
as Variable Lock will be Deprecated eventually
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@...>
Cc:
|
By
kenlautner3@...
·
#76140
·
|
|
[PATCH v1 0/1] *** Update BdsEntry.c to Variable Policy ***
From: Ken Lautner <klautner@...>
*** Changes BdsEntry.c from Variable Lock to Variable Policy
as Variable Lock is deprecated and won't be around in the
From: Ken Lautner <klautner@...>
*** Changes BdsEntry.c from Variable Lock to Variable Policy
as Variable Lock is deprecated and won't be around in the
|
By
kenlautner3@...
·
#76139
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v3 05/22] OvmfPkg: reserve Secrets page in MEMFD
The secrets page is applicable to all the SEV's (SEV, SEV-ES and
SEV-SNP) but there is some difference see below.
There is a fundamental difference between SEV and SEV-SNP attestation
flow. In the
The secrets page is applicable to all the SEV's (SEV, SEV-ES and
SEV-SNP) but there is some difference see below.
There is a fundamental difference between SEV and SEV-SNP attestation
flow. In the
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#76138
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/1] BaseTools GenFw: Fix regression issue to convert the image to ACPI data
If this is a regression, then the commit message should please identify
the commit that introduced the regression. We usually do this with:
Fixes: ....
Thanks
Laszlo
If this is a regression, then the commit message should please identify
the commit that introduced the regression. We usually do this with:
Fixes: ....
Thanks
Laszlo
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#76137
·
|
|
Re: VirtIO sound device in qemu?
My latest (admittedly, quite old) information has been that QEMU does
not implement a virtio-audio device yet. It's been work in progress.
Best inquire on qemu-devel, CC'ing the audio subsys
My latest (admittedly, quite old) information has been that QEMU does
not implement a virtio-audio device yet. It's been work in progress.
Best inquire on qemu-devel, CC'ing the audio subsys
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#76136
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] Platform/RaspberryPi: Enable Bluetooth and UART in Windows OS
Looks good to me.
Thanks for working on this!
--Mario
În lun., 7 iun. 2021 la 10:54, Sunny Wang <Sunny.Wang@...> a scris:
Looks good to me.
Thanks for working on this!
--Mario
În lun., 7 iun. 2021 la 10:54, Sunny Wang <Sunny.Wang@...> a scris:
|
By
Mario Bălănică
·
#76135
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Platform/RaspberryPi: Enable Bluetooth and UART in Windows OS
This version of MiniComm will work without vcredist (compiled with /MT): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v04RHUEIqlhrg2TUU_d_G4Z6lbZ1l44g/view?usp=sharing
--Mario
În lun., 7 iun. 2021 la 11:31,
This version of MiniComm will work without vcredist (compiled with /MT): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v04RHUEIqlhrg2TUU_d_G4Z6lbZ1l44g/view?usp=sharing
--Mario
În lun., 7 iun. 2021 la 11:31,
|
By
Mario Bălănică
·
#76134
·
|
|
[edk2-platforms][PATCH v1 1/1] MinPlatformPkg: Add missing components to DSC
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3033
Adds several libraries and modules to the MinPlatformPkg build that
are currently
From: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@...>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3033
Adds several libraries and modules to the MinPlatformPkg build that
are currently
|
By
Michael Kubacki
·
#76133
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] RFC: design review for TDVF in OVMF
My primary concern with the 5-level paging is not that the core
infrastructure is absent from edk2 -- it is present alright. (Over time,
numerous issues have been found and fixed in it, but that's
My primary concern with the 5-level paging is not that the core
infrastructure is absent from edk2 -- it is present alright. (Over time,
numerous issues have been found and fixed in it, but that's
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#76132
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v3 04/22] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: extend Es Workarea to include hv features
Hi Laszlo,
Noted.
I will split it, but all the checkpatch and CI stuff passed on my branch
before the submission.
Noted, I will match them.
Ah good catch. Thanks
Noted.
Okay, I will try
Hi Laszlo,
Noted.
I will split it, but all the checkpatch and CI stuff passed on my branch
before the submission.
Noted, I will match them.
Ah good catch. Thanks
Noted.
Okay, I will try
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#76131
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] Measured SEV boot with kernel/initrd/cmdline
I don't know how that area is used in practice; from my perspective,
shortening it to 3KB is OK.
Indeed if you expect the same userspace to work seamlessly, there is a
risk.
Cheers
Laszlo
I don't know how that area is used in practice; from my perspective,
shortening it to 3KB is OK.
Indeed if you expect the same userspace to work seamlessly, there is a
risk.
Cheers
Laszlo
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#76130
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v3 03/22] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: extend the workarea to include SNP enabled field
Hi Laszlo,
We must check the SNP Enabled inside the assembly code for the page
invalidate functions, and I decided to cache the value. A similar
SNP-enabled check is required in SEC phase before
Hi Laszlo,
We must check the SNP Enabled inside the assembly code for the page
invalidate functions, and I decided to cache the value. A similar
SNP-enabled check is required in SEC phase before
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#76129
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v3 05/22] OvmfPkg: reserve Secrets page in MEMFD
Here's the v2 discussion:
- http://mid.mail-archive.com/9804ecb5-8afd-c56e-4982-d1a6ebad3de8@...
- https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/74797
-
Here's the v2 discussion:
- http://mid.mail-archive.com/9804ecb5-8afd-c56e-4982-d1a6ebad3de8@...
- https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/74797
-
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#76128
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v3 05/22] OvmfPkg: reserve Secrets page in MEMFD
For pure SEV?
How is all of the above related to the "OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc"
platform, where remote attestation is not a goal?
What you describe makes sense to me, but only for the
For pure SEV?
How is all of the above related to the "OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc"
platform, where remote attestation is not a goal?
What you describe makes sense to me, but only for the
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#76127
·
|
|
Re: [RESEND PATCH RFC v3 00/22] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support
I re-reviewed patch #3 today, and reviewed patch #4 as well.
Because the data flow was not explained in advance, regarding the
"SevSnpEnabled" and "HypervisorFeatures" fields, I wasted a huge
I re-reviewed patch #3 today, and reviewed patch #4 as well.
Because the data flow was not explained in advance, regarding the
"SevSnpEnabled" and "HypervisorFeatures" fields, I wasted a huge
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#76126
·
|