|
Re: [PATCH RFC v2 05/28] MdePkg: Add AsmPvalidate() support
I am perfectly fine if the function return UINTN and then use #define
instead of the enum to define the PVALIDATE return code. So that caller
can check the error code. Let me know your thought on
I am perfectly fine if the function return UINTN and then use #define
instead of the enum to define the PVALIDATE return code. So that caller
can check the error code. Let me know your thought on
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#74748
·
|
|
Re: No ShellBinPkg with newer releases on github
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3178
(At this point, the title of that bug should be updated so it say
"edk2-stable202105".)
Laszlo
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3178
(At this point, the title of that bug should be updated so it say
"edk2-stable202105".)
Laszlo
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#74747
·
|
|
Re: Booting UEFI with QEMU arm
From "qemu-system-arm", it seems like you really mean 32-bit ARM.
Yes, there is support for that in edk2.
Build:
$ git submodule update --init --force
$ . edksetup.sh
$ nice make -C
From "qemu-system-arm", it seems like you really mean 32-bit ARM.
Yes, there is support for that in edk2.
Build:
$ git submodule update --init --force
$ . edksetup.sh
$ nice make -C
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#74746
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v2 05/28] MdePkg: Add AsmPvalidate() support
Noted.
Noted.
Noted.
Interestingly I did ran the series with edk2 CI and everything passed
before I submitted for the review. But, I will go ahead and fix the order.
Works with me.
Works
Noted.
Noted.
Noted.
Interestingly I did ran the series with edk2 CI and everything passed
before I submitted for the review. But, I will go ahead and fix the order.
Works with me.
Works
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#74745
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v2 04/28] MdePkg: Define the Page State Change VMGEXIT structures
Noted.
I will add something in comment to clarify that UNMASH and PSMASH are
not available in MSR protocol.
That macro is replaced is no longer used, I ended up creating a more
meaningful macro
Noted.
I will add something in comment to clarify that UNMASH and PSMASH are
not available in MSR protocol.
That macro is replaced is no longer used, I ended up creating a more
meaningful macro
|
By
Brijesh Singh
·
#74744
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v2 04/28] MdePkg: Define the Page State Change VMGEXIT structures
Thanks. I guess I was confused by the term "for the requested page size".
Yes, that's clear.
Thanks!
Laszlo
Thanks. I guess I was confused by the term "for the requested page size".
Yes, that's clear.
Thanks!
Laszlo
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#74743
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] ArmVirtPkg: Library: Memory initialization for Cloud Hypervisor
OK, thanks!
Indeed, the v1 patches have not reached the list.
Thanks,
Laszlo
OK, thanks!
Indeed, the v1 patches have not reached the list.
Thanks,
Laszlo
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#74742
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 1/1] CryptoPkg: BaseCryptLib: Add RSA PSS verify support
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3314
This patch uses Openssl's EVP API's to perform RSASSA-PSS verification
of a binary blob.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@...>
Cc: Xiaoyu
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3314
This patch uses Openssl's EVP API's to perform RSASSA-PSS verification
of a binary blob.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@...>
Cc: Xiaoyu
|
By
Agrawal, Sachin
·
#74741
·
|
|
[PATCH v3 0/1] CryptoPkg: Add RSA PSS verify support
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3314
This patch uses Openssl's EVP API's to perform RSASSA-PSS verification
of a binary blob.
Patch v1 Cover Letter :
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3314
This patch uses Openssl's EVP API's to perform RSASSA-PSS verification
of a binary blob.
Patch v1 Cover Letter :
|
By
Agrawal, Sachin
·
#74740
·
|
|
[PATCH 5/5] StandaloneMmPkg: build for 32bit arm machines
This change allows to build StandaloneMmPkg components for 32bit Arm
StandaloneMm firmware.
This change mainly moves AArch64/ source files to Arm/ side directory
for several components:
This change allows to build StandaloneMmPkg components for 32bit Arm
StandaloneMm firmware.
This change mainly moves AArch64/ source files to Arm/ side directory
for several components:
|
By
Etienne Carriere
·
#74739
·
|
|
[PATCH 4/5] StandaloneMmPkg: fix pointer/int casts against 32bit architectures
Use intermediate (UINTN) cast when casting int from/to pointer. This
is needed as UINT64 values cast from/to 32bit pointer for 32bit
architectures.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@...>
Cc:
Use intermediate (UINTN) cast when casting int from/to pointer. This
is needed as UINT64 values cast from/to 32bit pointer for 32bit
architectures.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@...>
Cc:
|
By
Etienne Carriere
·
#74738
·
|
|
[PATCH 3/5] GenGv: Arm: support images entered in Thumb mode
Change GenFv for Arm architecture to generate a specific jump
instruction as image entry instruction, when the target entry label
is assembled with Thumb instruction set. This is possible
Change GenFv for Arm architecture to generate a specific jump
instruction as image entry instruction, when the target entry label
is assembled with Thumb instruction set. This is possible
|
By
Etienne Carriere
·
#74737
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/5] ArmPkg: prepare 32bit ARM build of StandaloneMmPkg
Changes in ArmPkg to prepare building StandaloneMm firmware for
32bit Arm architectures.
Adds MmCommunicationDxe driver and ArmMmuPeiLib and
ArmmmuStandaloneMmLib libraries to the list of the
Changes in ArmPkg to prepare building StandaloneMm firmware for
32bit Arm architectures.
Adds MmCommunicationDxe driver and ArmMmuPeiLib and
ArmmmuStandaloneMmLib libraries to the list of the
|
By
Etienne Carriere
·
#74736
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/5] ArmPkg/IndustryStandard: 32b/64b agnostic FF-A and Mm SVC IDs
Defines ARM_SVC_ID_FFA_* and ARM_SVC_ID_SP_* identifiers for 32bit
function IDs as per SMCCC specification. Defines also generic ARM
SVC identifier macros to wrap 32bit or 64bit identifiers upon
Defines ARM_SVC_ID_FFA_* and ARM_SVC_ID_SP_* identifiers for 32bit
function IDs as per SMCCC specification. Defines also generic ARM
SVC identifier macros to wrap 32bit or 64bit identifiers upon
|
By
Etienne Carriere
·
#74735
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/5] Arm 32bit support in StandaloveMm
This series targets building StandaloneMM package for 32bit ARM
architectures. The main parts of the changes move AArch64/*
files to paths suitable for both 32bit and 64bit Arm machines.
Because
This series targets building StandaloneMM package for 32bit ARM
architectures. The main parts of the changes move AArch64/*
files to paths suitable for both 32bit and 64bit Arm machines.
Because
|
By
Etienne Carriere
·
#74734
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v2 04/28] MdePkg: Define the Page State Change VMGEXIT structures
Actually, for any page size, the GPA for any GFN is GFN << 12.
For the SNP Page State Change NAE event, it is up to the hypervisor to
ensure that the GFN/GPA supplied is aligned appropriately for
Actually, for any page size, the GPA for any GFN is GFN << 12.
For the SNP Page State Change NAE event, it is up to the hypervisor to
ensure that the GFN/GPA supplied is aligned appropriately for
|
By
Lendacky, Thomas
·
#74733
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v2 05/28] MdePkg: Add AsmPvalidate() support
Apologies, that should have been "EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER", not just
"INVALID_PARAMETER".
Thanks
Laszlo
Apologies, that should have been "EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER", not just
"INVALID_PARAMETER".
Thanks
Laszlo
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#74732
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v2 04/28] MdePkg: Define the Page State Change VMGEXIT structures
Sorry, unfinished sentence: I meant that the formula was not generally
correct.
Thanks
Laszlo
Sorry, unfinished sentence: I meant that the formula was not generally
correct.
Thanks
Laszlo
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#74731
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH RFC v2 05/28] MdePkg: Add AsmPvalidate() support
(1) typo: "rescnids"
(2) Please write "X64"; that's how the architecture is usually mentioned
in both the UEFI spec and in edk2.
(3) Typo: "[i]" should be "[in]".
(4) The order of parameters
(1) typo: "rescnids"
(2) Please write "X64"; that's how the architecture is usually mentioned
in both the UEFI spec and in edk2.
(3) Typo: "[i]" should be "[in]".
(4) The order of parameters
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#74730
·
|
|
Booting UEFI with QEMU arm
Hi,
Is it possible to boot UEFI on a qemu arm based emulator?
Since I am working from home and my uefi related work leads to device crash many times, which becomes painful for me.
So I wanted to do
Hi,
Is it possible to boot UEFI on a qemu arm based emulator?
Since I am working from home and my uefi related work leads to device crash many times, which becomes painful for me.
So I wanted to do
|
By
Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@...>
·
#74729
·
|