|
Re: [Patch v3 1/2] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: Restore Variable Lock Protocol behavior
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#68700
·
|
|
Re: EDK II CI failing - Do not submit PRs with "push" label set
This appears to be a good mirror of cmocka that is being kept up to date.
https://github.com/neverware-mirrors/cmocka
Mike
This appears to be a good mirror of cmocka that is being kept up to date.
https://github.com/neverware-mirrors/cmocka
Mike
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#68699
·
|
|
EDK II CI failing - Do not submit PRs with "push" label set
Hello,
The repo for the cmocka submodule is not available right now, and this is failing
CI checks that run unit tests. Pre-commit checks that do not have any unit tests
will pass, but the post
Hello,
The repo for the cmocka submodule is not available right now, and this is failing
CI checks that run unit tests. Pre-commit checks that do not have any unit tests
will pass, but the post
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#68698
·
|
|
Re: [Patch 1/1] MdeModulePkg/PciSioSerialDxe: Flush Tx before config change
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@...>
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@...>
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
|
By
Wu, Hao A
·
#68697
·
|
|
Re: [Patch v3 2/2] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: Add Variable Lock Protocol Unit Tests
With below typos fixed:
"Procol" -> "Protocol"
"succced" -> "succeed"
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@...>
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
With below typos fixed:
"Procol" -> "Protocol"
"succced" -> "succeed"
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@...>
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
|
By
Wu, Hao A
·
#68696
·
|
|
Re: [Patch v3 1/2] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: Restore Variable Lock Protocol behavior
By
Wu, Hao A
·
#68695
·
|
|
[Patch v3 2/2] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: Add Variable Lock Protocol Unit Tests
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111
Add host based unit tests for the multiple lock case using Variable Lock
Protocol, Variable Policy Protocol, and mixes of Variable Lock
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111
Add host based unit tests for the multiple lock case using Variable Lock
Protocol, Variable Policy Protocol, and mixes of Variable Lock
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#68694
·
|
|
[Patch v3 1/2] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: Restore Variable Lock Protocol behavior
From: Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111
The VariableLock shim currently fails if called twice because the
underlying Variable Policy
From: Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@...>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111
The VariableLock shim currently fails if called twice because the
underlying Variable Policy
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#68693
·
|
|
[Patch v3 0/2] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: Restore Variable Lock Protocol behavior
New in V3
==========
* Split into 2 patches. One for code change. Second for unit tests.
* Remove duplicate code and use ValidateSetVariable() to detect if a
variable is already
New in V3
==========
* Split into 2 patches. One for code change. Second for unit tests.
* Remove duplicate code and use ValidateSetVariable() to detect if a
variable is already
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#68692
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-announce] TianoCore Community Meeting Minutes - December
The page I mentioned with the broken links is https://github.com/tianocore-docs/tianocore-docs.github.io/blob/master/Readme.md (which is the source for https://tianocore-docs.github.io/).
--
The page I mentioned with the broken links is https://github.com/tianocore-docs/tianocore-docs.github.io/blob/master/Readme.md (which is the source for https://tianocore-docs.github.io/).
--
|
By
Rebecca Cran <rebecca@...>
·
#68691
·
|
|
TianoCore Community Meeting Minutes - December
TianoCore Community Meeting Minutes
December 10, 2020
EVENTS:
No new updates.
STABLE TAG:
Stable tag (edk2-stable202011) has been completed.
Upcoming 202102 stable tag features below. You
TianoCore Community Meeting Minutes
December 10, 2020
EVENTS:
No new updates.
STABLE TAG:
Stable tag (edk2-stable202011) has been completed.
Upcoming 202102 stable tag features below. You
|
By
Soumya Guptha
·
#68690
·
|
|
TianoCore Community Meeting - APAC/NAMO - Thu, 12/10/2020 7:30pm-8:30pm
#cal-reminder
Reminder: TianoCore Community Meeting - APAC/NAMO
When: Thursday, 10 December 2020, 7:30pm to 8:30pm, (GMT-08:00) America/Los
Reminder: TianoCore Community Meeting - APAC/NAMO
When: Thursday, 10 December 2020, 7:30pm to 8:30pm, (GMT-08:00) America/Los
|
By
devel@edk2.groups.io Calendar <devel@...>
·
#68689
·
|
|
Re: [Patch 1/1] MdeModulePkg/PciSioSerialDxe: Flush Tx before config change
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#68688
·
|
|
TianoCore Community Meeting - APAC/NAMO - Thu, 12/10/2020 7:30pm-8:30pm
#cal-reminder
Reminder: TianoCore Community Meeting - APAC/NAMO
When: Thursday, 10 December 2020, 7:30pm to 8:30pm, (GMT-08:00) America/Los
Reminder: TianoCore Community Meeting - APAC/NAMO
When: Thursday, 10 December 2020, 7:30pm to 8:30pm, (GMT-08:00) America/Los
|
By
devel@edk2.groups.io Calendar <devel@...>
·
#68687
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: Fix boot error
I agree with Ray to use RETF.
Thanks,
Guo
I agree with Ray to use RETF.
Thanks,
Guo
|
By
Guo Dong
·
#68686
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] MdePkg/include: Add DMAR SATC Table Definition
Reviewed-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@...>
Reviewed-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@...>
|
By
Zhiguang Liu
·
#68685
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-platforms][PATCH 29/34] Platform/Ampere: Add LinuxBoot image
Hi Leif,
Thanks for your feedback.
There is no problem for us to move the LinuxBoot binary to the edk2-non-osi. But we have some problem about license statement for the binary and we are also finding
Hi Leif,
Thanks for your feedback.
There is no problem for us to move the LinuxBoot binary to the edk2-non-osi. But we have some problem about license statement for the binary and we are also finding
|
By
Nhi Pham
·
#68684
·
|
|
[PATCH EDK2 v1 1/1] BaseTools/EfiRom: remove redundant checking of argc
As the condition of while statement is argc > 0, so argc < 1 will always
be false, it's redundant.
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@...>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>
Cc: Yuwei Chen
As the condition of while statement is argc > 0, so argc < 1 will always
be false, it's redundant.
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@...>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>
Cc: Yuwei Chen
|
By
wenyi,xie
·
#68683
·
|
|
[PATCH EDK2 v1 0/1] BaseTools/EfiRom: remove redundant checking of argc
Main Changes :
As the condition of while statement is argc > 0, so argc < 1 will always
be false.
Wenyi Xie (1):
BaseTools/EfiRom: remove redundant checking of argc
Main Changes :
As the condition of while statement is argc > 0, so argc < 1 will always
be false.
Wenyi Xie (1):
BaseTools/EfiRom: remove redundant checking of argc
|
By
wenyi,xie
·
#68682
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: Fix boot error
Tom,
We don't need to consider shadow stack because shadow stack is only enabled in SMM environment.
Guo,
I suggest we either revert the patch to keep the original 4G limitation, or use RETF to be
Tom,
We don't need to consider shadow stack because shadow stack is only enabled in SMM environment.
Guo,
I suggest we either revert the patch to keep the original 4G limitation, or use RETF to be
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#68681
·
|