|
Re: [edk2-platform][PATCH v1 1/1] Platforms/RaspberryPi: Fix DBG2 UART namespace reference
Thanks
Pushed as cec6bb18ae97..fe34d84a73cf
Thanks
Pushed as cec6bb18ae97..fe34d84a73cf
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#64242
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-test] [PATCH 1/1] uefi-sct/SctPkg: fix variable services conformance test
Hello Heinrich,
The patches are under review.
Will complete the review and merge by end of this week.
With Warm Regards,
Edhay
Hello Heinrich,
The patches are under review.
Will complete the review and merge by end of this week.
With Warm Regards,
Edhay
|
By
G Edhaya Chandran
·
#64241
·
|
|
[PATCH v15 46/46] Maintainers.txt: Add reviewers for the OvmfPkg SEV-related files
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
Register reviewers for the SEV-related files in OvmfPkg.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@...>
Cc: Michael D Kinney
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
Register reviewers for the SEV-related files in OvmfPkg.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@...>
Cc: Michael D Kinney
|
By
Lendacky, Thomas
·
#64240
·
|
|
[PATCH v15 45/46] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Prepare SEV-ES guest APs for OS use
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
Before UEFI transfers control to the OS, it must park the AP. This is
done using the
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
Before UEFI transfers control to the OS, it must park the AP. This is
done using the
|
By
Lendacky, Thomas
·
#64239
·
|
|
[PATCH v15 44/46] OvmfPkg: Move the GHCB allocations into reserved memory
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
After having transitioned from UEFI to the OS, the OS will need to boot
the APs. For an SEV-ES
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
After having transitioned from UEFI to the OS, the OS will need to boot
the APs. For an SEV-ES
|
By
Lendacky, Thomas
·
#64238
·
|
|
[PATCH v15 43/46] OvmfPkg: Use the SEV-ES work area for the SEV-ES AP reset vector
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
A hypervisor is not allowed to update an SEV-ES guest's register state,
so when booting an SEV-ES
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
A hypervisor is not allowed to update an SEV-ES guest's register state,
so when booting an SEV-ES
|
By
Lendacky, Thomas
·
#64237
·
|
|
[PATCH v15 42/46] UefiCpuPkg: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
Typically, an AP is booted using the INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence. This
sequence is intercepted by the
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
Typically, an AP is booted using the INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence. This
sequence is intercepted by the
|
By
Lendacky, Thomas
·
#64236
·
|
|
[PATCH v15 41/46] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Add CPU MP data flag to indicate if SEV-ES is enabled
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
When starting APs in an SMP configuration, the AP needs to know if it is
running as an SEV-ES
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
When starting APs in an SMP configuration, the AP needs to know if it is
running as an SEV-ES
|
By
Lendacky, Thomas
·
#64235
·
|
|
[PATCH v15 40/46] UefiCpuPkg: Add a 16-bit protected mode code segment descriptor
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
A hypervisor is not allowed to update an SEV-ES guests register state,
so when booting an SEV-ES
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198
A hypervisor is not allowed to update an SEV-ES guests register state,
so when booting an SEV-ES
|
By
Lendacky, Thomas
·
#64234
·
|
|
Re: [Patch ] Static IP based HTTP Support
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2888
*** NetworkPkg\HttpBootDxe\HttpBootClient.c 2020-05-07 22:54:46.000000000 +05-30
--- NetworkPkg\HttpBootDxe\HttpBootClient.c
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2888
*** NetworkPkg\HttpBootDxe\HttpBootClient.c 2020-05-07 22:54:46.000000000 +05-30
--- NetworkPkg\HttpBootDxe\HttpBootClient.c
|
By
Sivaraman Nainar
·
#64233
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Commit the auto-generated assembly files for X64
Thank you Mike to help on this.
I also believe that the best option is to integrate the auto-gen process in base tool.
Thank you Mike to help on this.
I also believe that the best option is to integrate the auto-gen process in base tool.
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#64232
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH edk2-platforms v1-resend 0/7] Updates to support Dynamic AML
Reviewed-by: Alexei Fedorov <Alexei.Fedorov@...>
Reviewed-by: Alexei Fedorov <Alexei.Fedorov@...>
|
By
Alexei Fedorov
·
#64231
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Commit the auto-generated assembly files for X64
Hi Jiewen,
For this use case, generating the files as part of the build process would add
a dependency in pearl.
Based on other recent CryptoPkg changes and some being discussed in BZ, I am
seeing
Hi Jiewen,
For this use case, generating the files as part of the build process would add
a dependency in pearl.
Based on other recent CryptoPkg changes and some being discussed in BZ, I am
seeing
|
By
Michael D Kinney
·
#64230
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Commit the auto-generated assembly files for X64
+ Mike Kinney
I am not sure if it is a right way to check in auto-generated file.
That means, whenever we upgrade the openssl, we need manually generate them again.
Any step by step, or readme to
+ Mike Kinney
I am not sure if it is a right way to check in auto-generated file.
That means, whenever we upgrade the openssl, we need manually generate them again.
Any step by step, or readme to
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#64229
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 00/30] Add Dynamic AML generation support
Reviewed-by: Alexei Fedorov <Alexei.Fedorov@...>
Reviewed-by: Alexei Fedorov <Alexei.Fedorov@...>
|
By
Alexei Fedorov
·
#64228
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Use RngLib instead of TimerLib for OpensslLib
Thanks Matthew.
I am OK, if you want to address the RDSEED in follow-up patch series.
Would you please file a new Bugzilla to record this, so we won't lose the information ?
Thanks Matthew.
I am OK, if you want to address the RDSEED in follow-up patch series.
Would you please file a new Bugzilla to record this, so we won't lose the information ?
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#64227
·
|
|
Re: [edk2-platform][PATCH v1 1/1] Platforms/RaspberryPi: Fix DBG2 UART namespace reference
Reviewed-by: Pete Batard <pete@...>
Reviewed-by: Pete Batard <pete@...>
|
By
Pete Batard
·
#64226
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] CryptoPkg: OpensslLib: Use RngLib to generate entropy in rand_pool
OK. I just see you describe that in v6 0/5 (not in v6 3/5 or Bugzilla 1871).
However, 0/5 will not be committed and information might be lost.
Would you please add your response in
OK. I just see you describe that in v6 0/5 (not in v6 3/5 or Bugzilla 1871).
However, 0/5 will not be committed and information might be lost.
Would you please add your response in
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#64225
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Add native instruction support for X64
Hi Christopher
Thanks.
1) Would you please help me understand more on "ApiHooks.c contains a stub function for a Windows API call" ?
Why we need this?
If it is compiler specific in openssl, should we
Hi Christopher
Thanks.
1) Would you please help me understand more on "ApiHooks.c contains a stub function for a Windows API call" ?
Why we need this?
If it is compiler specific in openssl, should we
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#64224
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] CryptoPkg: OpensslLib: Use RngLib to generate entropy in rand_pool
Hi Matthew Carlson
Do you have any thought on the feedback below?
Do you make any update in your patch V6?
Hi Matthew Carlson
Do you have any thought on the feedback below?
Do you make any update in your patch V6?
|
By
Yao, Jiewen
·
#64223
·
|