|
Re: [PATCH 5/5] ShellPkg: add BootManager library to add UEFI Shell menu option
I enthusiastically agree that we should apply your above
BootManagerUiLib patch. I don't see why (per spec) the UI should hide a
boot option just because it is inactive.
Thanks!
Laszlo
I enthusiastically agree that we should apply your above
BootManagerUiLib patch. I don't see why (per spec) the UI should hide a
boot option just because it is inactive.
Thanks!
Laszlo
|
By
Laszlo Ersek
·
#60409
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] BaseTools/Python: Add missing FatalError handling
A gentle reminder and adding Bob Feng and Liming Gao to CC.
Thank you,
Irene
A gentle reminder and adding Bob Feng and Liming Gao to CC.
Thank you,
Irene
|
By
Irene Park <ipark@...>
·
#60408
·
|
|
[PATCH] uefi-sct/SctPkg: Remove gEfiFormBrowserExProtocolGuid
From: Irene Park <ipark@...>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2145
Replace the gEfiFormBrowserExProtocolGuid with
gEdkiiFormBrowserExProtocolGuid, remove the unnecessary
From: Irene Park <ipark@...>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2145
Replace the gEfiFormBrowserExProtocolGuid with
gEdkiiFormBrowserExProtocolGuid, remove the unnecessary
|
By
Name <ipark@...>
·
#60407
·
|
|
[Patch 1/1] [Edk2Platforms] FitGen: Update FitGen tool to be compliance with the FIT specification revision 1.2
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2687
FIT specification revision 1.2 was recently released to the open community.
Revision 1.2 updates CSE Secure Boot Rules in section 4.12, and
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2687
FIT specification revision 1.2 was recently released to the open community.
Revision 1.2 updates CSE Secure Boot Rules in section 4.12, and
|
By
Jorge Hernandez Beltran <jorge.hernandez.beltran@...>
·
#60406
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2] ArmPkg/CompilerIntrinsicsLib: provide atomics intrinsics
Leif:
BZ 2723 is a tiano feature request. This patch adds support for new GCC10. I agree with Laszlo that this change is like the enhancement instead of the critical bug fix. So, I suggest to delay
Leif:
BZ 2723 is a tiano feature request. This patch adds support for new GCC10. I agree with Laszlo that this change is like the enhancement instead of the critical bug fix. So, I suggest to delay
|
By
Liming Gao
·
#60405
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 8/9] Platform/NXP: Add LX2160ARDB Platform
Minor style comment below.
Please insert alphabetically sorted.
Please insert alphabetically sorted.
No further comments on this set for v2.
For the patches I have not commented on:
Reviewed-by:
Minor style comment below.
Please insert alphabetically sorted.
Please insert alphabetically sorted.
No further comments on this set for v2.
For the patches I have not commented on:
Reviewed-by:
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#60404
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 0/9] Add LX2160ARDB Platform
And what is the change in this set compared to v1?
Yes, I can find out by going through all of the individual patches,
but that defeats a large part of the point of having a cover letter.
/
And what is the change in this set compared to v1?
Yes, I can find out by going through all of the individual patches,
but that defeats a large part of the point of having a cover letter.
/
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#60403
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH edk2-platforms v2 3/9] Silicon/NXP: Use edk2 recommended compilation flags
Unfortunately, this patch now causes the RELEASE build to fail with
/work/git/edk2-platforms/Silicon/NXP/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c:172:9:
error:
Unfortunately, this patch now causes the RELEASE build to fail with
/work/git/edk2-platforms/Silicon/NXP/Library/PciHostBridgeLib/PciHostBridgeLib.c:172:9:
error:
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#60402
·
|
|
Cancelled Event: TianoCore Design Meeting - APAC/NAMO - Friday, 29 May 2020
#cal-cancelled
Cancelled: TianoCore Design Meeting - APAC/NAMO
This event has been cancelled.
When:
Friday, 29 May 2020
9:30am to 10:30am
(UTC+08:00)
Cancelled: TianoCore Design Meeting - APAC/NAMO
This event has been cancelled.
When:
Friday, 29 May 2020
9:30am to 10:30am
(UTC+08:00)
|
By
devel@edk2.groups.io Calendar <devel@...>
·
#60401
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] New RISC-V Patches - Why in edk2-platforms
Hi Abner,
Sorry, I should have followed up on this sooner.
Can you point me to the conversation I have missed?
I don't see this as a valid argument.
It's not edk2-unstable, it is
Hi Abner,
Sorry, I should have followed up on this sooner.
Can you point me to the conversation I have missed?
I don't see this as a valid argument.
It's not edk2-unstable, it is
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#60400
·
|
|
Re: BDS Phase Menu
MdeModulePkg\Application\BootManagerMenuApp
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of jim slaughter
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2020 2:46 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject:
MdeModulePkg\Application\BootManagerMenuApp
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of jim slaughter
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2020 2:46 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject:
|
By
Ni, Ray
·
#60399
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Compile AML bytecode array into OBJ file
Hi Pierre,
Sorry for late response. I'll review the patch in this week and response early in the next week.
Thanks,
Bob
Hi Pierre,
Sorry for late response. I'll review the patch in this week and response early in the next week.
Thanks,
Bob
|
By
Bob Feng
·
#60398
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Compile AML bytecode array into OBJ file
Hello Bob and Liming,
Just a message in case you missed the patch set,
Regards,
Pierre
Hello Bob and Liming,
Just a message in case you missed the patch set,
Regards,
Pierre
|
By
PierreGondois
·
#60397
·
|
|
AcpiView Patches
Hi,
Any chance you had time to look at my AcpiView patches?
Cheers,
Tom
Hi,
Any chance you had time to look at my AcpiView patches?
Cheers,
Tom
|
By
Tomas Pilar (tpilar)
·
#60396
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] CryptoPkg: Fix VS2017 build problem for ARM/AARCH64
Hmm, if this has never worked on MSFT:ARM/AArch64, I don't think it
would qualify even during soft freeze? (Whereas if it was a question
of making it work on vs2019 afer having worked with vs2017 it
Hmm, if this has never worked on MSFT:ARM/AArch64, I don't think it
would qualify even during soft freeze? (Whereas if it was a question
of making it work on vs2019 afer having worked with vs2017 it
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#60395
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] MdePkg/Include: AARCH64: disable outline atomics on GCC 10.2+
I agree the timing is crap.
Or distro defaults changing in between. I mean, we could say "Arch
is the same as any other distro's unstable", but I wouldn't want to go
down that route - I know people
I agree the timing is crap.
Or distro defaults changing in between. I mean, we could say "Arch
is the same as any other distro's unstable", but I wouldn't want to go
down that route - I know people
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#60394
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2] ArmPkg/CompilerIntrinsicsLib: provide atomics intrinsics
Thanks Gary.
Liming, can we consider this patch for stable tag please?
With an added link to
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2723 in the commit message:
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm
Thanks Gary.
Liming, can we consider this patch for stable tag please?
With an added link to
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2723 in the commit message:
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm
|
By
Leif Lindholm
·
#60393
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 5/5] ArmPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: don't connect all devices on each boot
In order to avoid boot delays from devices such as network controllers
that may not even be involved in booting at all, drop the call to
EfiBootManagerConnectAll () from the boot path. It will be
In order to avoid boot delays from devices such as network controllers
that may not even be involved in booting at all, drop the call to
EfiBootManagerConnectAll () from the boot path. It will be
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#60392
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 4/5] ArmPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: hide UEFI Shell as a regular boot option
Without ConnectAll() being called on the boot path, the UEFI shell will
be entered with no block devices or anything else connected, and so for
the novice user, this is not a very accommodating
Without ConnectAll() being called on the boot path, the UEFI shell will
be entered with no block devices or anything else connected, and so for
the novice user, this is not a very accommodating
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#60391
·
|
|
[PATCH v2 3/5] MdeModulePkg/BootManagerUiLib: show inactive boot options
UEFI boot options may exist but have the LOAD_OPTION_ACTIVE flag
cleared. This means that the boot option should not be selected
by default, but it does not mean it should be omitted from the
boot
UEFI boot options may exist but have the LOAD_OPTION_ACTIVE flag
cleared. This means that the boot option should not be selected
by default, but it does not mean it should be omitted from the
boot
|
By
Ard Biesheuvel
·
#60390
·
|