-----Original Message-----

> From: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 11:35 PM
> To: Xu, Min M <min.m.xu@...>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@...>; Gao, Liming
> <gaoliming@...>; Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang.liu@...>; Yao,
> Jiewen <jiewen.yao@...>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@...>; Lu, Ken
> <ken.lu@...>; Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>; nd <nd@...>;
> Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@...>;
> thanu.rangarajan@...
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] MdePkg: Define CC Measure EventLog ACPI Table
>
> Hi Min,
>
> Thank you for this patch.
>
> Please find my response inline marked [SAMI].
>
> Regards,
>
> Sami Mujawar
>
>
> On 02/03/2022 12:28 AM, Min Xu wrote:
> > RFC: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3853
> >
> > TDVF set up an ACPI table (EFI_CC_EVENTLOG_ACPI_TABLE) to pass the
> > event-log information. The event log created by the TD owner contains
> > the hashes to reconstruct the MRTD and RTMR registers.
> >
> > Please refer to Sec 4.3.3 in blow link:
> > https://www.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/
> > intel-tdx-guest-hypervisor-communication-interface-1.0-344426-002.pdf
> >
> > Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@...>
> > Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>
> > Cc: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@...>
> > Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@...>
> > Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@...>
> > Cc: Ken Lu <ken.lu@...>
> > Cc: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@...>
> > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>
> > Signed-off-by: Min Xu <min.m.xu@...>
> > ---
> > MdePkg/Include/Protocol/CcMeasurement.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/CcMeasurement.h
> b/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/CcMeasurement.h
> > index 83eaafaf10a6..86de226c1d82 100644
> > --- a/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/CcMeasurement.h
> > +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/CcMeasurement.h
> > @@ -307,4 +307,24 @@ extern EFI_GUID gEfiCcFinalEventsTableGuid;
> >
> > extern EFI_GUID gCcEventEntryHobGuid;
> >
> > +//
> > +// Define the CC Measure EventLog ACPI Table
> > +//
> > +#pragma pack(1)
> > +
> > +typedef struct {
> > + EFI_ACPI_DESCRIPTION_HEADER Header;
> > + UINT32 Rsvd;
> > + UINT64 Laml;
> > + UINT64 Lasa;
> > +} EFI_CC_EVENTLOG_ACPI_TABLE;
> > +
> > +#pragma pack()
> > +
> > +//
> > +// Define the signature and revision of CC Measurement EventLog ACPI Table
> for Td guest
> > +//
> > +#define EFI_CC_EVENTLOG_ACPI_TABLE_TD_SIGNATURE SIGNATURE_32('T',
> 'D', 'E', 'L')
> > +#define EFI_CC_EVENTLOG_ACPI_TABLE_TD_REVISION 1
> [SAMI] I can see that the above macros have the _TD_ infix. Is the
> intention here that each architecture shall define its own signature and
> revision?
> Would it be possible to make the signature generic across architectures,
> e.g. "SIGNATURE_32('C', 'C', 'E', 'L')" ?
> [/SAMI]
> > +
> > #endif