+ + // + // The order matters when packing all applied microcode patches to a single binary blob. + // Therefore it is a must to do sorting before packing. + // NOTE: We assumed that the order of address of every microcode patch in RAM is the same + // with the order of those in the Microcode Firmware Volume in FLASH. If any future updates + // made this assumption untenable, then needs a new solution to measure microcode patches. + //
Can you explain the above comments? If you only measure the microcode which will be applied to CPU, why do you care about the order?
