Re: [PATCH 1/1] OvmfPkg PlatformBootManagerLib: Move TryRunningQemuKernel()
Christoph Willing
On 10/8/21 4:01 pm, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,Thanks for your interest Gerd,insmod /lib/modules/5.13.8/kernel/fs/jbd2/jbd2.ko I added "-serial mon:stdio" to the qemu invocation and "console=ttyS0" to the -append line to capture all boot output for both good and bad cases and saved the results in files. Rather than spam the list with those outputs, I've added them as attachments to the bz report at https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3504 When I first diff'd them, the slight difference in time stamps meant every line showed up as different - real differences were hard to see. Therefore I amended the files to replace the time stamps with "xxxx", enabling diff to show actual differences more meaningfully. I also attached there the output of a diff between the bad & good cases. To be honest I can't see anything striking to explain the difference in behaviour. To me, the main difference is that in the good case, an QEMU HARDDISK & QEMU DVD-ROM are discovered and allows the system to boot but no obvious indication why they are discovered in one case but not the other. Apart from that, there are a few differences in some memory locations being used but I have insufficient knowledge to judge whether those differences are significant. Is it possible for anyone to have a quick look through those files for anything that may indicate what is causing the defective booting please? Thanks, chris
|
|