toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Marvin H?user Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 3:21 PM To: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@...>; devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@...>; Vitaly Cheptsov <vit9696@...> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Consistent DebugImageInfoTable updates
On 09/08/2021 08:52, Wu, Hao A wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Marvin H?user Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 2:16 PM To: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@...>; devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@...>; Vitaly Cheptsov <vit9696@...> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Consistent DebugImageInfoTable updates
Good day Hao,
Sorry for the confusion, and you are (rightfully!) not alone. :( I'll quote myself from a different patch:
[...] for some reason, none of the other patch series had indices appended. I'm sure I can get that fixed shortly, but what to do then, re-send the entire bulk? I don't want to spam the list, maybe it is smarter to group them by some overview mail this one time? I would suggest to send a V2 series for all the patches (not only limited to MdeModulePkg) you sent.
Right, I can do that, just many of the patches were actually meant to be single and independent. I believe there were two series that somehow did not get indexed by the command. I just forced numbering now and it seems to work.
May it be easier if I re-send only the two series? A few of the individual patches actually started review. I am fine with this. My intention for asking V2 for all the patches was that doing so I can simply ignore all the V1 patch mails. Best Regards, Hao Wu Thanks for your suggestions, and sorry again for the disruption!
Best regards, Marvin
Please ensure that patches belong to one series are generated by a single 'git format-patch' command.
I think doing so will add information like '1/n', '2/n', ..., 'n/n' for the patches in one series.
And you may need to create a cover-letter for one patch series to give a brief summary on the purpose of the series as a whole.
Also, if you are implementing a new feature or a fix that touches many modules, I suggest to file a Bugzilla tracker for it:
Feature request: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Tianocore%20Featu re%20Requests Bugfix: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=EDK2
Lastly, you may keep the 'Reviewed-by' tags already received by other reviewers.
Best Regards, Hao Wu
Sorry for the disruption!
Best regards, Marvin
On 09/08/2021 08:10, Wu, Hao A wrote:
Sorry Marvin Häuser,
Could you help to confirm that below 9 MdeModulePkg related patches are either:
* All independent patches * Belong to a patch series that includes all these 9 MdeModulePkg related commits
* Belong to several independent patch series
MdePkg/Base.h: Introduce various alignment-related macros MdeModulePkg/CoreDxe: Mandatory LoadedImage for DebugImageInfoTable
MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Fix DebugImageInfoTable size report MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Use the correct source for fixed load address MdeModulePkg/PiSmmCore: Drop deprecated image profiling commands MdeModulePkg/CoreDxe: Drop caller-allocated image buffers MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Drop unnecessary pointer indirection MdeModulePkg/PiSmmIpl: Correct fixed load address bounds check MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Consistent DebugImageInfoTable updates
Best Regards, Hao Wu
-----Original Message----- From: Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@...> Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 3:40 AM To: devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@...>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@...>; Bi, Dandan <dandan.bi@...>; Liming Gao <gaoliming@...>; Vitaly Cheptsov <vit9696@...> Subject: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Consistent DebugImageInfoTable
updates
In theory, modifications to the DebugImageInfoTable may cause exceptions.
If the exception handler parses the table, this can lead to subsequent exceptions if the table state is inconsistent.
Ensure the DebugImageInfoTable remains consistent during modifications. This includes: 1) Free the old table only only after the new table has been published. Mitigates use-after-free of the old table. 2) Do not insert an image entry till it is fully initialised. Entries may be inserted in the live range if an entry was deleted previously. Mitigaes the usage of inconsistent entries. 3) Free the old image entry only after the table has been updated with the NULL value. Mitigates use-after-free of the old entry. 4) Set the MODIFIED state before performing any modifications.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@...> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@...> Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@...> Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@...> Cc: Vitaly Cheptsov <vit9696@...> Signed-off-by: Marvin Häuser <mhaeuser@...> --- MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/DebugImageInfo.c | 60 +++++++++++-- ----
--- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/DebugImageInfo.c b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/DebugImageInfo.c index a75d4158280b..7bd970115111 100644 --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/DebugImageInfo.c +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/DebugImageInfo.c @@ -165,10 +165,11 @@ CoreNewDebugImageInfoEntry ( IN EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle ) {- EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO *Table;- EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO *NewTable;- UINTN Index;-
UINTN TableSize;+ EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO *Table;+ EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO *NewTable;+ UINTN Index;+ UINTN TableSize;+ EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO_NORMAL *NormalImage; // // Set the flag indicating that we're in the process of updating the table.@@ -203,14 +204,6 @@ CoreNewDebugImageInfoEntry (
// Copy the old table into the new one // CopyMem (NewTable, Table,
TableSize);- //- // Free the old table- //- CoreFreePool (Table);- //- // Update the table header- //- Table = NewTable; mDebugInfoTableHeader.EfiDebugImageInfoTable = NewTable; // // Enlarge the max table entries and set the first empty entry index to@@ - 218,24 +211,34 @@ CoreNewDebugImageInfoEntry ( // Index = mMaxTableEntries; mMaxTableEntries += EFI_PAGE_SIZE / EFI_DEBUG_TABLE_ENTRY_SIZE;+ //+ // Free the old table+ //+ CoreFreePool (Table);+ //+ // Update the table header+ //+ Table = NewTable; } // // Allocate data for new entry //- Table[Index].NormalImage = AllocateZeroPool (sizeof (EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO_NORMAL));- if (Table[Index].NormalImage != NULL) {+ NormalImage = AllocateZeroPool (sizeof (EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO_NORMAL));+ if (NormalImage != NULL) { // // Update the entry //- Table[Index].NormalImage->ImageInfoType = (UINT32) ImageInfoType;- Table[Index].NormalImage-
LoadedImageProtocolInstance = LoadedImage;- Table[Index].NormalImage->ImageHandle = ImageHandle;+ NormalImage->ImageInfoType = (UINT32) ImageInfoType;+ NormalImage->LoadedImageProtocolInstance = LoadedImage;+ NormalImage->ImageHandle = ImageHandle; //- // Increase the
number of EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO elements and set the mDebugInfoTable in modified status.+ // Set the mDebugInfoTable in modified status, insert the entry, and+ // increase the number of EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO elements. //- mDebugInfoTableHeader.TableSize++; mDebugInfoTableHeader.UpdateStatus |= EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO_TABLE_MODIFIED;+ Table[Index].NormalImage
= NormalImage;+ mDebugInfoTableHeader.TableSize++; } mDebugInfoTableHeader.UpdateStatus &= ~EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO_UPDATE_IN_PROGRESS; }@@ -253,8 +256,9 @@
CoreRemoveDebugImageInfoEntry ( EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle ) {- EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO *Table;- UINTN
Index;+ EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO *Table;+ UINTN Index;+
EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO_NORMAL *NormalImage; mDebugInfoTableHeader.UpdateStatus |= EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO_UPDATE_IN_PROGRESS; @@ -263,16 +267,20 @@
CoreRemoveDebugImageInfoEntry ( for (Index = 0; Index < mMaxTableEntries; Index++) { if (Table[Index].NormalImage != NULL && Table[Index].NormalImage-
ImageHandle == ImageHandle) { //- // Found a match. Free up the record, then NULL the pointer to indicate the slot- // is free.+ // Found a
match. Set the mDebugInfoTable in modified status and NULL the+ // pointer to indicate the slot is free and. //- CoreFreePool (Table[Index].NormalImage);+ NormalImage = Table[Index].NormalImage;+ mDebugInfoTableHeader.UpdateStatus |=
EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO_TABLE_MODIFIED; Table[Index].NormalImage
= NULL; //- // Decrease the number of EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO elements and set the mDebugInfoTable in modified status.+ // Decrease
the number of EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO elements. // mDebugInfoTableHeader.TableSize--;- mDebugInfoTableHeader.UpdateStatus |= EFI_DEBUG_IMAGE_INFO_TABLE_MODIFIED;+ //+ // Free up the record.+ //+ CoreFreePool (NormalImage); break; } }-- 2.31.1
|