Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] MdeModulePkg/PciBusDxe: Fix possible uninitialized use


Ni, Ray
 

How about below fix? I think it might be simpler to understand and doesn't introduce unnecessary logic to handle impossible case:
if (ResizableBarOp == PciResizableBarMax) {
Bit = HighBitSet64(Capabilities);
} else {
ASSERT (ResizableBarOp == PciResizableBarMin);
Bit = LowBitSet64(Capabilities);
}

-----Original Message-----
From: Sergei Dmitrouk <sergei@...>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 8:17 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@...>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@...>;
Ni, Ray <ray.ni@...>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/3] MdeModulePkg/PciBusDxe: Fix possible uninitialized
use

If the function gets invalid value for the `ResizableBarOp` parameter
and asserts are disabled, `Bit` can be used uninitialized.

Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@...>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@...>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@...>
Signed-off-by: Sergei Dmitrouk <sergei@...>
---
MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciLib.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciLib.c
b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciLib.c
index 6bba28367165..de601713a53b 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciLib.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciLib.c
@@ -1781,6 +1781,11 @@ PciProgramResizableBar (
} else if (ResizableBarOp == PciResizableBarMin) {
Bit = LowBitSet64(Capabilities);
} else {
+ //
+ // Set Bit to avoid uninitialized use when built without assertions.
+ //
+ Bit = 0;
+
ASSERT ((ResizableBarOp == PciResizableBarMax) || (ResizableBarOp ==
PciResizableBarMin));
}

--
2.17.6

Join devel@edk2.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.