On 05/07/21 17:19, Brijesh Singh wrote:
On 5/7/21 10:10 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Yes, I will keep patch#9 in SNP series.
Sounds good. What's your thought if I take out patch 1 - 9 from this RFCMore precisely, that means patches 1-8 (because patch#9 should be
series and submit them as non-RFC for the further review and acceptance
? The patch# 1-9 are basically prepatch before we get into SNP specific
replaced by the module-scope override, and also moved to just before
what is currently patch#21).
Other than that, I agree, this is a good idea. I've anyway thought that
the MdePkg stuff (5 patches) could be / should be merged up-front in
separation, and then the subsequent 3 patches for OvmfPkg are basically
refactoring. We can record the resultant commit range (8 commits) in
TianoCore#3275, and keep the BZ open for the rest of the work. So go
FYI, I will add couple of more patches in MdePkg to define the macros
for AP creation and RMPAJUST instruction. Now that GHCB spec is final,
we are working to get the AP creation implemented for the next version.
If the spec is final, then extending the MdePkg patches makes sense, yes.