(Top posting, maybe that way I'll have more luck.)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Min Xu -- it's not really trust-inspiring to not receive any feedback
(not even an out-of-office auto-response) from you, in a week, for a
Maintainers.txt patch that designates you as a reviewer for confidential
computing in OVMF. If we are to extrapolate from this responsiveness,
what should we expect for actual *patch* reviews?
Would you like me to drop your name & entry from patch#2?
On 03/11/21 18:13, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 03/10/21 19:56, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2198For merging this series, I still need ACKs from James and Min Xu, please.
Generalize the current OVMF SEV subsystem entry, so that we can use it
for Intel TDX in the future, ensuring proper patch circulation for
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@...>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@...>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@...>
Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@...>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@...>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@...>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@...>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@...>
Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@...>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@...>
Laszlo Ersek (2):
Maintainers: refresh the OVMF SEV subsystem after TianoCore #2198 and
Maintainers: rename the OVMF SEV subsystem to "Confidential Computing"
Maintainers.txt | 28 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)