On 11/20/20 08:11, Yao, Jiewen wrote: I agree with Liming.
I recommend we follow the code-freeze process.
"By the date of the soft feature freeze, developers must have sent their patches to the mailing list and received positive maintainer reviews (Reviewed-by or Acked-by tags)."
The re-design could be compatible in some way. For example, we can keep old API and define RequestMonotonicCounterEx(), IncrementMonotonicCounterEx().
I am also thinking that we should check in together with a lib consumer to show the design to see what is really needed for the counter index.
So I vote to revert the change. I agree. Without knowing many of the details: The patch references < https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2594>, and that ticket is a TianoCore Feature Request. Additionally, comment#0 on the BZ says: "Two more features are needed to be added to non-volatile variable services [...] This BZ is for RPMC based solution only". I think the patch should not have been committed. Thanks Laszlo
-----Original Message-----
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of
gaoliming
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 2:55 PM
To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Mistry,
Nishant C <nishant.c.mistry@intel.com>
Cc: afish@apple.com; lersek@redhat.com; 'Leif Lindholm'
<leif@nuviainc.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] SecurityPkg: Add RPMC Index to the
RpmcLib
Jian:
The commit message mentions that the re-design requires multiple RPMC
counter usages.
The library API is also updated to support multiple RPMC. So, I think this
is new feature.
But, this is just my idea. I would like to collect more feedback from the
mail list.
Thanks
Liming
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
发送时间: 2020年11月20日 14:33
收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn; Mistry, Nishant C
<nishant.c.mistry@intel.com>
主题: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] SecurityPkg: Add RPMC Index to the RpmcLib
Liming,
Sorry, I didn't notice it. But the patch was just updating the existing
code. It'd
be
more like bug fix than feature, I think.
Regards,
Jian
-----Original Message-----
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of gaoliming
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 2:27 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Mistry,
Nishant C <nishant.c.mistry@intel.com>
Cc: gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn
Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] SecurityPkg: Add RPMC Index to the
RpmcLib
Jian:
This change is like a feature instead of bug fix. Now, we are in soft
feature freeze phase.
According to SFF definition
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/SoftFeatureFreeze,
this feature should be deferred to next stable tag.
So, I suggest to revert this change, and merge it after the stable tag
202011.
Thanks
Liming
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: bounce+27952+67669+4905953+8761045@groups.io
<bounce+27952+67669+4905953+8761045@groups.io> 代表 Wang, Jian J
发送时间: 2020年11月18日 11:35
收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; Mistry, Nishant C
<nishant.c.mistry@intel.com>
主题: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] SecurityPkg: Add RPMC Index to the
RpmcLib
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Regards,
Jian
-----Original Message-----
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of
Nishant
Mistry
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 2:49 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] SecurityPkg: Add RPMC Index to the
RpmcLib
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2594
The re-design requires multiple RPMC counter usages.
The consumer will be capable of selecting amongst multiple counters.
Signed-off-by: Nishant C Mistry <nishant.c.mistry@intel.com>
---
SecurityPkg/Include/Library/RpmcLib.h | 6 +++++-
SecurityPkg/Library/RpmcLibNull/RpmcLibNull.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/SecurityPkg/Include/Library/RpmcLib.h
b/SecurityPkg/Include/Library/RpmcLib.h
index 5882bfae2f..3c15bce1ce 100644
--- a/SecurityPkg/Include/Library/RpmcLib.h
+++ b/SecurityPkg/Include/Library/RpmcLib.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
/**
Requests the monotonic counter from the designated RPMC
counter.
+ @param[in] CounterIndex The RPMC index
@param[out] CounterValue A pointer to a buffer
to
store the RPMC
value.
@retval EFI_SUCCESS The operation
completed
successfully.
@@ -23,12 +24,15 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
EFI_STATUS
EFIAPI
RequestMonotonicCounter (
+ IN UINT8 CounterIndex,
OUT UINT32 *CounterValue
);
/**
Increments the monotonic counter in the SPI flash device by 1.
+ @param[in] CounterIndex The RPMC index
+
@retval EFI_SUCCESS The operation
completed
successfully.
@retval EFI_DEVICE_ERROR A device error
occurred
while attempting
to update the counter.
@retval EFI_UNSUPPORTED The operation is un-supported.
@@ -36,7 +40,7 @@ RequestMonotonicCounter (
EFI_STATUS
EFIAPI
IncrementMonotonicCounter (
- VOID
+ IN UINT8 CounterIndex
);
#endif
diff --git a/SecurityPkg/Library/RpmcLibNull/RpmcLibNull.c
b/SecurityPkg/Library/RpmcLibNull/RpmcLibNull.c
index e1dd09eb10..697e493a7c 100644
--- a/SecurityPkg/Library/RpmcLibNull/RpmcLibNull.c
+++ b/SecurityPkg/Library/RpmcLibNull/RpmcLibNull.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
/**
Requests the monotonic counter from the designated RPMC
counter.
+ @param[in] CounterIndex The RPMC index
@param[out] CounterValue A pointer to a buffer
to
store the RPMC
value.
@retval EFI_SUCCESS The operation
completed
successfully.
@@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
EFI_STATUS
EFIAPI
RequestMonotonicCounter (
+ IN UINT8 CounterIndex,
OUT UINT32 *CounterValue
)
{
@@ -31,6 +33,8 @@ RequestMonotonicCounter (
/**
Increments the monotonic counter in the SPI flash device by 1.
+ @param[in] CounterIndex The RPMC index
+
@retval EFI_SUCCESS The operation
completed
successfully.
@retval EFI_DEVICE_ERROR A device error
occurred
while attempting
to update the counter.
@retval EFI_UNSUPPORTED The operation is un-supported.
@@ -38,7 +42,7 @@ RequestMonotonicCounter (
EFI_STATUS
EFIAPI
IncrementMonotonicCounter (
- VOID
+ IN UINT8 CounterIndex
)
{
ASSERT (FALSE);
--
2.16.2.windows.1
|
