On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 15:33, Laszlo Ersek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On 03/05/20 13:30, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 12:23:46 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:We said that stewards wouldn't have the power to approve such, but the
I no longer work for Linaro (and haven't for a while) so in anticipationI have no issue either way, but I also don't think a proper decision
of losing access to my @linaro.org mailbox, let's switch to the ARM one
for my Tiancore contributions and maintainerships. Update the .mailmap
at the same time so the tooling can rewrite history where needed.
was made last time around the .mailmap topic came up as to whether it
was intended to span organisation changes.
subject contributors would.
At present it does not in this project, and I would prefer for such aI'm fine with both keeping and dropping the .mailmap hunk, as it is
change to happen after an explicit policy decision rather than by
In the meantime, for the Maintainers.txt changes:
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <email@example.com>
being proposed by Ard.
So either way:
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Given the fact that the mailmap is only used when explicitly asked for
it, adding the entry is not going to make it more likely that
unsuspecting contributors will end up using my @arm.com email address
after looking at my contributions in the Git history. So I dropped the
mailmap hunk and pushed this to edk2 master.