On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:38:13AM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:03:46PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 04:39:29PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:I'm sure a paranoid provider wouldn't use a debug build of OVMF :-). So
+BOOLEANThat's IMO dangerous. Using the version as an indication that
+ // This function should only be used after XenConnect
+ ASSERT (mXenInfo.VersionMajor != 0);
XenConnect has run seems like a bad idea, since returning a major
version of 0 is a valid number to return. Can't you check against
something else that doesn't depends on hypervisor provided data? (ie:
like some allocations or such that happen in XenConnect)
A paranoid could provider could even return major == 0 and minor == 0
in order to attempt to hide the Xen version used, since guests are not
supposed to infer anything from the Xen version, available hypervisor
features are reported by other means.
that assert doesn't matter. There's nothing dangerous in a `nop'! :-D
But I could use mXenInfo.HyperPages instead.
It's just a nit, and TBH it's quite unlikely for anyone to report a
major version of 0, it's just that if you have something else to
assert for initialization it might be safer.